IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 September 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140019741
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests her discharge from the U.S. Army (USAR) be voided.
2. The applicant states she had extenuating medical circumstances that prevented her from attending the basic officer leadership course (BOLC) within the prescribed time period. She has a permanent profile and was authorized to take an alternate Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). She was told that if she passed the APFT and met the height/weight standards she would be sent to BOLC starting on 26 October 2014. However, on 23 October 2014 she was told that her unit would not pay the associated costs to send her to school because she was scheduled for involuntary separation because she was twice not selected for promotion to captain.
3. The applicant provides copies of
* DA Form 705 (APFT Scorecard)
* DA Form 5501 (Body Fat Content Worksheet)
* FA Form 3349 (Physical Profile)
* Headquarters, 99th Regional Support Command memorandum dated 14 August 2014
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Following Regular Army enlisted service, USAR enlisted service in a troop program unit, and completion of advanced civilian education, the applicant was appointed a USAR first lieutenant in the Medical Service Corps on 31 January 2011 for an indefinite term with approved age in grade and medical waivers. Her duty position was clinical social work officer.
2. On 16 December 2014, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army Reserve by Orders 14-321-00013 issued by the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) on 17 November 2014.
3. As evidence to support her application, the applicant provided the following documents:
a. A 14 August 2014 memorandum from Headquarters, 99th Regional Support Command, states if she was twice non-selected for promotion to captain she would be removed from the active status list in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14504(a).
b. A physical profile electronically signed by a medical doctor on 18 September 2014 that shows she received a permanent profile of "2" for her overall physical capacity or stamina. The applicant was receiving treatment for a "bone condition" and was able to conduct all functional activities of soldiering with no limitations. Her physical limitations were no running and no swimming. She could take the alternate APFT of walking or biking. She had no limitations for sit-ups or push-ups.
c. A Body Fat Content Worksheet shows she was in compliance with the Army standards on 5 October 2014.
d. An APFT Scorecard shows she passed the APFT on 4 October 2014 with the alternate aerobic event of walking.
4. An advisory opinion was obtained from USARC in the processing of this application. The Chief, Personnel Management Division, noted that the applicant was discharged because she had twice been non-selected for promotion. The Chief also noted that, although the applicant claimed extenuating circumstances in her not meeting the education requirement, she had 3 years in which to complete BOLC. The applicant was separated incompliance with the law and Army Regulation 135-175 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve - Separation of Officers).
5. The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for her rebuttal or comment. No response was received within the time allotted.
6.. Army Regulation 135-175 prescribes the policies, criteria, and procedures governing the separation of Reserve officers of the Army. Paragraph 4-4a states officers of the Army Reserve will be removed from an active status as follows:
a. An officer in the rank of first lieutenant, captain or major who has completed their statuary military service obligation will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after a second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Component selection board.
b. An officer who fails to complete required military education requirements in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), table 2-2, or Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers). Table 2-2 states that for first lieutenants being considered for promotion to captain they must have completed the resident officer basic course. There are no exceptions or waivers authorized for this specific educational requirement.
7. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14504a states that a first lieutenant on the reserve active status list of the Armed Forces who has failed selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time shall be separated not later than the 1st day of the 7th month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant states that she had extenuating medical circumstances that prevented her from attending BOLC. However, she provided no evidence to support her argument. The evidence provided shows she met medical retention standards with a permanent profile, met height and weight standards, and successfully passed an alternate APFT, albeit in early October 2014. During this period she was advised she had not been selected for promotion to captain during a second consideration.
2. Notwithstanding the applicants contention she was prepared and ready to attend BOLC in October 2014, the law required her removal from an active status because she was twice not selected for promotion to captain. Based on the evidence of record and the law, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x_____ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019741
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019741
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002582
His record includes a Personnel Qualification Record (Officer), dated 14 August 2007, showing his promotion eligibility date as 9 November 2003. His self-authored statement follows: After notification of selection in [April] 2002, I requested that my unit (the 8th Medical Brigade) submit the documentation to award my promotion. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to COL/O-6 in 2002.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019274
The applicant's medical records and profiling documents are not available for review by the Board. To support its opinion, the advisory official provided a copy of a memorandum from the director of officer personnel management to the office of Reserve component promotions, dated 17 June 2009, requesting publication of promotion orders for the applicant to the rank of LTC with a DOR of 12 June 2009 based on assignment to a valid position of higher authority, effective 27 May 2009. This...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016118C070206
The Memorandum of Record states the applicant's effective date of promotion to 1LT was 2 October 2004 when the APFT and MAW promotion qualifications were met IAW Army Regulation 135- 155, paragraph 4-8. The applicant completed the AMEDD Officer Basic Course (Reserve Component) on 13 June 2003 and her DA Form 1059 indicates she met the height and weight standard at that time. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021577
The reason given was that the records review did not indicate he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day before the date the board convened. e. The opinion further indicated the applicant may be eligible for a promotion reconsideration board because he provided evidence indicating he was educationally qualified at the time he was considered by the FY 2010 Captain APL promotion board. He was also not selected for promotion to captain by this board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059470C070421
The applicant provided DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard), dated 22 April 1999, which shows that she passed the APFT and her height was recorded as 69 inches and her weight was recorded as 214 pounds. However, evidence of record shows that the applicant failed to take the APFT for two consecutive years due to a medical profile (May 1996 to April 1997; and May 1997 to April 1998). After review of all evidence in this case, the Board determined that the applicant has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087266C070212
On 15 October 1995, while still on profile, counsel states that the applicant failed his alternate APFT. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed a record APFT on 15 October 1995 and again on 3 August 1997. There is no evidence of record that the applicant ever passed a record APFT from the date of his appointment to the date of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002682
The applicant states it is an injustice that her promotion board profile was not looked at which resulted in her being passed over for promotion to CPT. Mandatory Department of the Army promotion selection boards would convene on or about 27 November 2012 to consider Reserve of the Army AMEDD 1LT's for promotion to CPT. The evidence of record shows the applicant was passed over for promotion to CPT by the FY 2012 and 2013, CPT, AMEDD Promotion Selection Boards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065184C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits copies of: an 11 December 1997 letter informing him of his eligibility for promotion consideration by the upcoming AMEDD Promotion Board; reassignment orders; letters from AR-PERSCOM with six endorsements; two DA Forms 705 dated 6 June 1998 and 2 January 1999 respectively; two DA Forms 5500-R dated 6 June 1998 and 1 January 1999...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014333
Her record contains the contested memorandum 2, a memorandum for the Office of the DCoS, G-1, dated 21 August 2013, subject: Show Cause Recommendation - The Applicant, from LTG JWT, CDR, USARC. The U.S. Army Human Resources Command's (HRC) website contains a video script, dated 15 May 2015, subject: Selection Board Process Script, wherein MAJ CW, a board recorder for DA selection boards stated, in part: a. HQDA convenes approximately 80 selection boards each year. Also in accordance with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075297C070403
Paragraph 7-8f of the same regulation states the physical profiles for Reservist not on active duty may be accomplished by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) staff surgeons, medical corps commander of USAR hospitals, or the Surgeon, AR-PERSCOM without a physical profile board (PPBD). Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states that soldiers when found...