Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019138
Original file (20140019138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	 4 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019138 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy (ETP) and payment of an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) in the amount of $10,000.00.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00.

	b.  He was unable to complete area of concentration (AOC) training within the required 36-month period.  The date of the OAB agreement was 25 July 2009 and the duty military occupational specialty qualified date was 30 November 2012.

	c.  Upon completion of Officer Candidate School in July 2009, he encountered personal hardship in the form of civilian employment.  He delayed his Basic Officer Leadership Course (BOLC) attendance in order to acquire civilian employment.  This personal hardship delayed him for approximately a year and a half.

	d.  Upon obtaining civilian employment, he attempted to schedule his BOLC, but was forced onto a waiting list to attend school.  The lack of school seats forced him to wait until August 2012 to begin BOLC with completion in November 2012, thus preventing his BOLC completion within the required 36-month time frame.

3.  The applicant provides:

* memorandum from Hawaii Army National Guard (HIARNG) requesting an ETP, dated 18 June 2012
* ETP denial letter, dated 11 April 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior enlisted service in the HIARNG, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the HIARNG on 25 July 2009.

2.  In connection with his appointment on 25 July 2009, he signed a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum in which he agreed:

* to serve in the ARNG under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP)
* to serve in the Selected Reserve in AOC 42B (Human Resources Officer (entry-level Adjutant General Corps Officer))
* to accomplish the necessary training prescribed by the Secretary of the Army (completion of BOLC III) to achieve the designated skill within 36 months of appointment

3.  The addendum also shows he would receive a bonus of $10,000.00 paid in two installments.  The first installment would be paid upon completion of BOLC and the second installment would be paid on the third anniversary of his appointment.

4.  On 18 June 2012, the HIARNG submitted a request for an ETP of BOLC completion for the applicant.  The memorandum stated:

* the applicant was appointed on 25 July 2009 and is not due to complete BOLC within the required time frame
* after attempting to schedule BOLC in September 2011, he was pushed back to his current scheduled school date of 10 September 2012
* due to civilian work, school availability, and Army-wide mobilization priorities, he was unable to acquire an earlier attendance date
* he is currently enrolled in a "Reserved" status for BOLC, reporting on 9 September 2012
* Army Training Requirements and Resource System printout enclosed (this printout was not provided)

5.  There is no evidence of record showing the applicant was denied BOLC attendance in September 2011 or that he was wait-listed for the course.

6.  He completed the Adjutant General BOLC on 27 November 2012.

7.  In April 2013, NGB disapproved the request for an ETP because the applicant did not complete AOC training within 36 months which violates ARNG SRIP Policy 07-06.  NGB directed the State Incentive Manager to terminate the incentive without recoupment.

8.  He was promoted to captain on 7 July 2015.

9.  Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308j(b), states the Secretary concerned may pay an accession bonus under this section to an eligible person who enters into an agreement with the Secretary to:  (a) accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces and (b) to serve in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve in a skill designated for a period specified in the agreement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the evidence shows he signed a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum for an OAB in which he agreed to complete BOLC within 36 months of his appointment on 25 July 2009.

2.  He indicated he voluntarily delayed BOLC attendance to seek civilian employment following his completion of Officer Candidate School in July 2009.  He completed BOLC in November 2012.

3.  The HIARNG request for an ETP to retain the applicant's OAB based on his delayed reservation for BOLC, dated 18 June 2012, which stated he would not complete BOLC within the required time frame due to civilian work, school availability, and Army-wide mobilization priorities was also carefully considered.  However, there is no evidence of record showing the applicant was denied BOLC attendance in September 2011 or that he was wait-listed for the course.

4.  If the applicant's attempt to schedule BOLC attendance in September 2011 (more than 2 years after his appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer) was denied, he should have immediately requested an ETP to retain the OAB based on his delayed reservation for BOLC, not 1 month before his 36-month requirement expired.  The applicant failed to exercise due diligence in this matter.

5.  The available evidence is insufficient on which to base approval of an ETP and payment of an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  __x______  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019138



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019138



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011873

    Original file (20130011873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He explains recoupment was initiated due to the fact that the service representative and incentive manager (IM) for the state of Montana signed his officer accession agreement over one year after his commissioning date. The official stated the details of his contract/agreement were as follows: * State accessed: Montana; Unit Identification Code (UIC): TQST0 * Date of agreement: 29 September 2008 * Contracted bonus addendum: $10,000.00 * Contracted AOC: 35D; Current AOC 15C * Date duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001013

    Original file (20130001013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records do not contain a written agreement for an OAB. On 15 November 2012, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) disapproved the request for an ETP because the applicant failed to sign the OAB agreement. Since there is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any evidence of contracting for an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005726

    Original file (20120005726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her record contains a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum, dated 10 May 2008. She attested she signed the written agreement on 10 May 2008, she obtained a reservation for BOLC from the NGB, she was slotted to attend the course beginning July 2010, and she graduated on 8 September 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a written agreement for a $10,000.00 OAB at the time of her commissioning/appointment in the ARNG on 10 May 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022438

    Original file (20120022438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of the second $5,000.00 installment of his officer accession bonus (OAB). NGB denied the applicant's request to receive his OAB because the service representative and a witnessing officer failed to sign the addendum and advised the applicant to apply to this Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing all parties concerned properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020643

    Original file (20130020643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The OAB addendum stated the applicant agreed to serve in CS AOC 88D; however, he did not attend BOLC for 88D and the unit he was assigned to did not have any 88D slots. The applicant attended BOLC for 88A, which was also a CS AOC at the time he signed the OAB addendum, and he is slotted in an 88A position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 15 August 2011 Written Agreement – OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010361

    Original file (20130010361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Oath of Office * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings in Docket Number AR20120007223, dated 15 November 2012 * NGB ETP denial, dated 1 May 2013 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 29 March 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He provides an ABCMR Record of Proceedings pertaining to another applicant wherein the Board recommended granting relief to that applicant for correction of her records to show she was entitled to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018238

    Original file (20130018238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) * self-authored statements * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20090007581, dated 16 June 2009 * OAB Agreement * 2 ETP Denial Letters, dated 7 June 2013 and 1 July 2013 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB ETP denial letters both show: * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011362

    Original file (20130011362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to be eligible for the SELRES OAB as a commissioned officer an individual in the ARNG must meet the Headquarters, Department of the Army eligibility criteria and be appointed in a critically-short AOC listed in the current ARNG SRIP announcement in effect on the date the individual makes application for officer appointment/training or on or before the officer's appointment date. He was appointed as a second lieutenant in the DEARNG on 2 October 2010 and his Written Agreement-OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004354

    Original file (20120004354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. An NGB memorandum, dated 17 January 2012, subject: Request for ETP for Officer CSRB [Applicant], shows the Deputy G-1, ARNG, denied the ETP request on the basis that the applicant was not eligible for the CSRB because he had not completed the service obligation required for receipt of his OAB. An HIARNG Incentive Manager certified his CSRB agreement, even though NGB's implementation guidance stated officers who had not completed bonus contract obligations were not eligible to enter into...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014770

    Original file (20120014770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There was whiteout on the original contract on the Service Representative line; there is no Service Representative signature or date entered into the bonus addendum; and she did not enter the date or unit address on the bonus addendum; b. she was not at fault for the way her bonus contract was handled after she submitted the required documents. In a 23 May 2012 memorandum, the Military Personnel...