Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019049
Original file (20140019049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  25 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019049 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show in item 9d (Effective Date) the date of "27 April 1975" instead of "7 March 1975."

2.  The applicant states the dates on his DD Form 214 are wrong.  He entered into the service on 11 November 1974 and was discharged on 27 April 1975.  He believes this is an administrative error that was made on his DD Form 214.  He recently discovered the error when he attempted to get tags for his motor vehicle.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of the cases and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 11 November 1974, for 3 years.  He did not complete advanced individual training for award of a military occupational specialty.

3.  On 24 February 1975, the Chaplain, 1st Infantry Training Brigade, Fort Polk, LA, stated the applicant had difficulty adjusting to the military and seemed unable to cope with the requirements of training.  The applicant lacked motivation and had personal problems at home.  He recommended for the good of the applicant and the Army that the applicant be discharged.

4.  On 27 February 1975, the applicant's company commander initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Department of Army (DA) Message DTG-011510Z, dated August 1973, Subject:  Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180 Active Duty Days.  The company commander stated the reason for the proposed action was that the applicant was immature mentally and unable to cope with the rigors of military life.  

5.  On 27 February 1975, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the proposed separation.  He waived his right to counsel and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

6.  On 3 March 1975, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge and directed the issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  

7.  Special Orders (SO) Number 065, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Polk, LA on 6 March 1975, honorably discharged him under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations) and DA Message 011510Z, with an effective date of 7 March 1975.

8.  Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 7 March 1975.  He was credited with completing 3 months and 27 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 lists in:

* Item 9d – 7 March 1975
* Item 15 – 11 November 1974


9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established the standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation stated:

* Item 11d – would list the effective date of separation
* Item 15 – would list the beginning date entered on active duty for the period covered by the DD Form 214

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record verifies the applicant enlisted in the RA on 11 November 1974.  This date is currently listed on his DD Form 214.  As result, no correction is required.

2.  SO were issued discharging him under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200 and DA Message 011510Z, with an effective date of 7 March 1975.  The separation authority approved his discharge and he was discharged accordingly. He was issued a DD Form 214 reflecting this date. 

3.  There is no evidence of record and he provided none showing he continued serving on active duty after 7 March through 27 April 1975.  By regulation, item 11d of the DD Form 214 would list the effective date of separation.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support granting him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x______  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019049





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019049



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009041

    Original file (20070009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows, in pertinent part, that on 29 November 1975, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, Fort Ord, California, in duty military occupational specialty code (MOSC) 09B0O for the purpose of attending BCT. On 8 April 1975, the colonel serving as Commander, School Brigade, U.S. Army Signal School, Fort Gordon, Georgia, approved the separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010098

    Original file (20140010098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the Army. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA on 2 September 1975 and was honorably discharged on 18 December 1975 under the TDP which is properly shown on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he served on active duty beyond his date of separation (18 December 1975).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002028

    Original file (20130002028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 contains the following information: * item 4 (DOB) shows his birth date as 30 October 1955 * item 9d (Effective Date) shows the effective date of his discharge as 2 December 1975 * item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) shows he entered active duty on 22 August 1974 * item 18c (Total Active Service) shows he completed 1 year, 2 months, and 23 days of total active service *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003169

    Original file (20130003169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 10 September 1979 be corrected to show his correct dates of active service. The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 September 1979 * General Discharge Certificate, dated 10 September 1979 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 9d (Effective Date) contains the entry "75 04 28" or 28 April 1975. c. Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) contains the entry "0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018098

    Original file (20090018098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 5 December 1975 be corrected to show he entered active duty on 1 June 1975. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013833

    Original file (20060013833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013833 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 28 February 1975, the applicant was notified of her pending separation under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message DAPE-MPE 011510Z August 1973 Subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018110

    Original file (20100018110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his: * Rank/grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3 * Dates of service from September 1969 to December 1973 * Total active service as 4 years and 3 months 2. On 10 December 1973, the applicant’s immediate commander advised the applicant he intended to recommend him for discharge under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message Date Time Group 011510Z, dated August 1973, Subject:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014160

    Original file (20130014160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the dates of entry and discharge are incorrect due to the fact that he served for 2 years from May 1972 to June 1974 * he served on active duty for a period of 2 years, yet his DD Form 214 shows his active duty time as 19 days * he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) during this enlistment, which is a questionable award for such a short tour of duty * he worked in the area of supply where he completed both basic and military occupational specialty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014016

    Original file (20110014016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 10 December 1968 to show: * his social security number (SSN) as "5XX-XX-XXXX" instead of "2XX-XX-XXXX" * his entry date as 16 instead of 23 August 1966 * three awards of the Army Commendation Medal 2. The applicant completed three periods of service (induction, enlistment, and reenlistment) and he was issued a separate DD Form 214 for each period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000464

    Original file (20080000464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the authority and reason for his separation, Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and reentry (RE) code listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. On 22 January 1975, while the applicant was still in basic combat training (BCT), his unit commander notified him that action to...