Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019042
Original file (20140019042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  10 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019042 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry and separation disability determination for the MH condition. 

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in
The diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Program.  The evidence of the available records shows the diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and mood disorder due to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) were rendered during processing through the DES.  The SRP agreed that the MH diagnoses were not changed in the disability evaluation.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP noted that the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 (mental disorders due to traumatic stress) were appropriately applied in this case.  The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at the time of TDRL entry.  The higher 70 percent rating was for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas.”  There were no further
psychiatric hospitalizations, no emergency department visits, no impairment in thought processes, and no suicidal or homicidal ideation.  The SRP concluded the record in evidence did not support a higher than 50 percent rating at TDRL entry and there was insufficient reasonable doubt for recommending a 70 percent TDRL entry rating.

4.  The SRP agreed at the time of permanent retirement that the record adequately demonstrated that the applicant continued to meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD.  He remained symptomatic, but controlled with medications.  There was no reported history of persistent suicidal or homicidal thoughts, plan, intent, or attempts.  There was no indication of a pattern of alcohol abuse.  There was no report of legal problems.  There was no report of domestic violence or violence outside of the home.  His mental status examination recorded no impairment in judgment, noted no evidence of psychosis, and no issues in orientation or hygiene.  Although there was a call documented to the suicide hotline in June 2012, the records evidenced that the applicant’s symptoms had stabilized with no hospitalizations and no recorded visits to the emergency room for mental health issues. 

5.  After due deliberation in consideration of VASRD Section 4.3, the SRP concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the applicant’s permanent retirement rating of 50 percent for the mental health condition.

6.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  



      ___________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140019042



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005864

    Original file (20150005864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change of the applicant's disability and separation determination. The diagnosis of pain disorder was not forwarded by the MEB; however, this was not to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009095

    Original file (20140009095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There was no evidence in the record of recurrent suicidal behaviors, no recorded visits to the emergency room for MH treatment, no recurrent psychiatric hospitalizations and no impairment in thinking or judgment at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was applicable in this case with a 50 percent disability rating. UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012617

    Original file (20150012617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP noted that the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) assigned a disability rating of 50 percent with appropriate application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental disorders due to traumatic stress). After due deliberation in consideration of VASRD Section 4.3, the SRP concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015308

    Original file (20140015308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003882

    Original file (20150003882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommended no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the permanent retirement rating of 30 percent for the unfitting mental health condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The SRP noted that the PEB assigned a disability rating of 30 percent without application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001259

    Original file (20140001259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013487

    Original file (20140013487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014262

    Original file (20140014262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should no change in the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the temporary disability and permanent retirement determination. The SRP noted the neurology medical evaluation board (MEB) recorded the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and that the neuropsychological evaluation had not recorded a diagnosis of PTSD and PTSD had not appeared in any other clinical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007328

    Original file (20150007328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP agreed that physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was supported by the evidence; therefore, the diagnosis of PTSD was the appropriate diagnosis, and application of the provisions of the Department of Veterans...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015297

    Original file (20140015297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health (MH) condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation...