Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018860
Original file (20140018860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  16 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018860 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect:

	a.  correction of his military records to show he was retained on active duty for medical/dental treatment in 2004 and

	b.  provision of artificial teeth (dentures) to replace the 13 teeth extracted while he was in a military duty status in 2004.

2.  The applicant states he is "missing in action."  In effect, he states he was improperly released from his active duty assignment with the 144th Field Artillery Battalion, California Army National Guard (CAARNG).  He had 13 teeth extracted and was told there was no provision to replace his teeth after he was released from active duty and returned to his parent unit, the 143d Field Artillery Battalion, CAARNG.  He was assigned a class 3 dental rating (active duty service members who require urgent or emergent dental treatment).  The Army cannot discharge a service member with a class 3 dental rating without replacement teeth.  He was abandoned and denied medical/dental treatment in order to complete his 6-year term of enlistment.

3.  The applicant provides:

* letters from the Office of Strategic Communications, State of California Military Department, dated 14 February 2014, 5 May 2014, and 14 August 2014
* DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States)
* medical/dental records, dated November 2003
* CAARNG Orders 88-1031, dated 29 March 2006
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 1 March 2006
* documentation from the Department of Veterans Affairs

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior enlisted service in the Regular Army and the CAARNG, the applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 14 September 2001 for a period of 6 years.  He attained the rank of specialist.

3.  The applicant's available records do not contain active duty or mobilization orders.  It appears that he was ordered to active duty in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom/Enduring Freedom as a member of the CAARNG and had 13 teeth extracted during his pre-deployment health assessment in 2003.

4.  He provided service dental records, dated November 2003, which show he had 13 teeth extracted and he was assigned a class 3 dental rating.  The treatment plan for one dental record, dated 25 November 2003, states evaluate for dentures.  These extractions appear to be the result of a Soldier Readiness Processing he processed through with the CAARNG at that time.

5.  His records do not contain and he did not provide a line-of-duty determination.

6.  Records show he was reduced in rank for inefficiency as follows:

* from specialist to private first class effective 29 October 2004
* from private first class to private two effective 21 April 2005
* from private two to private one effective 8 August 2005

7.  CAARNG Orders 88-1031, dated 29 March 2006, discharged him from the CAARNG under honorable conditions (general) effective 1 March 2006 for unsatisfactory participation.

8.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders D-09-720075, dated 18 September 2007, honorably discharged him from the U.S. Army Reserve effective 18 September 2007.

9.  He provided a letter from the State of California Military Department Office of Strategic Communications, dated 14 February 2014, which states information provided by the CAARNG indicates:

Prior to a deployment, all personnel must go through a Soldier Readiness Processing (SRP) event to evaluate and update their administrative and medical/dental readiness.  Any deficiencies identified at the SRP event must be corrected prior to departure to the Power Projection Platform (PPP) or mobilization station.  You were initially selected to deploy on two different occasions in 2004 (March and September).  If severe dental issues were identified, then those deficiencies would have to be corrected or you would not be able to deploy.

Extractions are required for severe tooth issues that may cause harm to a Soldier, thus avoiding a possible non-battle injury.  The dental personnel at a military facility would have completed only what was required to make you immediately deployable (the extraction of the affected teeth).  Your statement that the military would ensure that you were provided with false teeth does not seem in line with the normal mobilization readiness process.

There is no record of any DD Form 214s [sic] (Certificates of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) recording that you completed any deployments.  In addition, all your deployment orders were revoked (copies enclosed).

10.  Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration), chapter 3 (Persons Eligible for Care in Army Medical Treatment Facilities and Care Authorized), provides that Reserve Component members on active duty or Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD) or inactive duty training (IDT) are authorized medical and dental care in Army medical treatment facilities for injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty while performing that duty or while traveling directly to or from the duty.

	a.  While on active duty or FTNGD orders for more than 30 days, Reserve Component personnel are authorized healthcare on the same basis as the Active Component.

	b.  After expiration of the period of duty, Reserve Component personnel are authorized medical and dental care only for conditions incurred or aggravated in the line of duty while on that training/duty or while traveling directly to or from such training/duty.

	c.  While performing IDT, active duty, or FTNGD for 30 days or less, Reserve Component personnel are authorized medical and dental care as a result of injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated incident to IDT or active duty for training.

	d.  Health care authorized for persons performing IDT, active duty, or FTNGD for 30 days or less will be provided until the resulting disability from covered disease or injury cannot be materially improved by further hospitalization or treatment.

	e.  Upon expiration of the active duty or FTNGD orders or the IDT period, Reserve Component members are released from duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom/Enduring Freedom as a member of the CAARNG and had 13 teeth extracted during his pre-deployment health assessment in 2003.

2.  The applicant's available records do not contain active duty orders and the letter from the State of California Military Department Office of Strategic Communications indicates his deployment orders were revoked.  The available evidence is insufficient to show he served on active duty or was released from active duty in 2003/2004.

3.  The service dental records he provided support his contention that he had 13 teeth extracted in 2003.  However, the letter from the State of California Military Department Office of Strategic Communications indicates the dental personnel at a military facility would have completed only what was required to make him immediately deployable (the extraction of the affected teeth).

4.  There is no evidence indicating he incurred or aggravated an injury, illness, or disease in the line of duty while performing that duty or while traveling directly to or from the duty.  It appears that his class 3 dental rating resulted from individual oral hygiene neglect and the dental personnel at the military facility completed only what was required to make him immediately deployable.

5.  There is no evidence showing he was evaluated for artificial teeth or that he sought dental treatment to correct his dental issues while serving in the CAARNG.  The available evidence is insufficient to grant his request for replacement teeth (dentures).

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  _x_______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x________________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018860



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018860



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01939 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2010-01939 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also chart on mandibular arch missing teeth 17, 31, and 32. c. SF Form 93, Item 25, add note all maxillary teeth missing 1-16, replaced by complete denture. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit K). We note that based on the medical and dental documentation provided by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085519C070212

    Original file (2003085519C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only those defects which are, might or will cause a soldier problems on active duty are required to be treated. There is no record of the applicant having any outstanding dental defects at the time of his separation from active duty. While the applicant opted to have partial dentures, pontic and crowns made and installed shortly after his retirement, there is no evidence that his dental condition required such treatment for him to remain on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010591

    Original file (20080010591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request: a. reconstructed DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 15 September 1990; b. two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn statement), dated 15 September 1990 and 14 October 1990; c. memorandum, dated 7 June 2005, Joint Forces Headquarters, CAARNG, Sacramento, CA, subject: Line of Duty; d. memorandum, dated 14 June 2005, from the applicant to the Joint Forces Headquarters, CAARNG,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005241

    Original file (20130005241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he "worked as if [he] was on active duty" from 13 January 2007 when he was released from Fort Lewis through 15 December 2010 with no breaks in service * he received pay for this period of service * prior to that, he was serving on active duty in the AGR Program from 15 February 1996 through 2005 * he deployed to Iraq until September 2006 and then transferred Stateside until 12 January 2007 where he was transferred back to the Army National Guard (ARNG) * he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013822

    Original file (20100013822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 17 (Member Was Provided Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior to Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an "X" in the "No" block. The applicant provided copies of the following: * DD Form 214 * Standard Form 603A (Medical Record – Dental – Continuation) * Aspen Dental form * DD Form 2870 (Authorization for Disclosure of Medical or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002693

    Original file (20070002693.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests appearance before a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), and the issue of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Separation or Discharge from the Active Army) and service credit for the period 15 December 2003 through 15 August 2005. The applicant's records show that he was still a member of the 375th Transportation Company when Permanent Orders 04-023-007, dated 23 January 2004, revoked his mobilization order, signifying that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006939

    Original file (20100006939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20060008643 on 21 February 2007. The service dental records and VA documentation provided by the applicant are new evidence which will be considered by the Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140006008

    Original file (AR20140006008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 January 2012, the CAARNG State Surgeon's Office issued the applicant an updated physical profile rating of T3 under the P factor. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a member is unfit because of physical disability to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009648

    Original file (20120009648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) grant of full relief in Docket Number AR20090016282 on 8 July 2010, which resulted in his processing through the PDES and his medical retirement effective 16 May 2008, he believes he remains entitled to either basic pay, drill pay, or incapacitation pay for the period between his erroneous release from active duty (REFRAD) on 3 January 2007 and his retirement date of 16 May 2008. On 19 October 2011, the U.S. Army Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012653

    Original file (20090012653.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant states that he received injuries to his mouth during a mortar attack on 5 May 1968. The evidence provided by the applicant shows that he had an injury to his face on the same morning that an enemy attack occurred on his headquarters.