Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018512
Original file (20140018512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  9 June 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018512 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states as a Combat Infantryman Badge recipient he is requesting the Bronze Star Medal in accordance with Executive Order 11046.  He states the issuing authority's lack of knowledge of Executive Order 11382 resulted in him not being awarded the Bronze Star Medal. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 28 June 1966, he was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11F (Infantry Operations and Intelligence Specialist).

3.  He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry in the Republic of Vietnam from 21 May 1967 to 30 January 1968.

4.  There are no recommendations to award him the Bronze Star Medal in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ).

5.  There are no orders in his MPRJ awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal; however it does show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

7.  On 2 July 1968, he was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal; however, the Combat Infantryman Badge is listed.

8.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.

	a.  The Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

	b.  The Bronze Star Medal is authorized for each individual who was cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945 or whose achievement or service, during that period, was confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947.  An award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Medical Badge is considered to be a citation in orders.  Therefore, the Bronze Star Medal is to be awarded to individuals who were authorized either badge for service during World War II.

10.  Executive Order 11046 provided that the Bronze Star Medal, with accompanying ribbons and appurtenances, which was first established by Executive Order No. 9419 of 4 February 1944 may be awarded by the Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Transportation with regard to the Coast Guard when not operating as a service in the Navy, or by such military commanders, or other appropriate officers as the Secretary concerned may designate, to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard of the United States, after December 6, 1941, distinguishes, or has distinguished, himself by heroic or meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight-

	a.  while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;

	b.  while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force; or

	c.  while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

11.  Executive Order 11382 was an amendment of executive orders relating to functions of the Department of Transportation.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

13.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His DA Form 20 does not indicate he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  A review of ADCARS failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.  There are no recommendations or orders in his MPRJ related to the Bronze Star Medal.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support adding the Bronze Star Medal to his DD Form 214.

2.  The provisions for awarding Bronze Star Medal based on the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge do not apply in this case.  The Bronze Star Medal was awarded to individuals who were authorized the Combat Infantryman Badge for service during World War II.  The applicant's service was during the Vietnam War.

3.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the  Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018512



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018512



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508080C070209

    Original file (9508080C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Bronze Star, the Silver Star and the Presidential Unit Citation for service in World War II. Despite the letter included with his application indicating that a recommendation for the Silver Star was submitted on his behalf, there is no evidence of a formal recommendation or approval of such an award in the record. The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the US Army after 6 December 1941,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009348

    Original file (20060009348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009348 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012166

    Original file (20130012166 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). In accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) he should have been awarded the BSM based on his award of the CIB. Only during WWII, when the CIB was created, was authorization granted to automatically award the BSM based on individuals having been awarded the CIB or CMB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076066C070215

    Original file (2002076066C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, limited medical records were provided to the Board as well as the applicant’s separation documents. One document in the applicant’s remaining military records shows him as a Tec 3. However, the CMB is not listed on the applicant’s separation document nor are there any orders for the CMB contained in his military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015525

    Original file (20080015525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” (for Valor) Device and the Combat Infantryman Badge. This document further shows that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal with One Bronze Service Star, and the United Nations Service Medal. While the available records show that the applicant was an infantryman and served in Korea with the 45th Reconnaissance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020157

    Original file (20110020157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's limited records contain a WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation – Certificate of Service) that shows: * entry on active duty on 6 February 1941 * departed CONUS on 6 June 1941 * service in the PI from 23 June 1941 through 16 June 1945 * unit – 26th Cavalry (PS), Headquarters, 6th Army, PI * military occupational specialty (MOS) – horse cavalry unit commander, 1613 * wounded on 28 February 1942 * departed the PI on 16 June 1945 and arrived in CONUS on 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007801

    Original file (20100007801.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the spelling of his last name on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) be corrected and he be awarded the Silver Star and the Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, it is not appropriate to correct the record and award the applicant the Silver Star at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076619C070215

    Original file (2002076619C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) be amended to add all awards that were issued to him (i.e., the Silver Star, the Expert Infantryman Badge, two Bronze Star Medals (BSMs) for valor, "Airborne Glider Assault Wings," the Parachutist Badge, the "Army Amphibious Badge," the European-African-Middle Eastern (EAME) Campaign Medal with 3 bronze service stars, the Army of Occupation Medal, and the French Legion of Merit). Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008277

    Original file (20110008277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 25 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008277 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110008277 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110008277 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016314

    Original file (20080016314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain general orders awarding him the Medal of Honor, the Silver Star, or the Bronze Star Medal. In the applicant's case, it is noted that: a. the applicant's record is void of a recommendation for award of the Medal of Honor; there are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Medal of Honor; and the applicant did not provide any incontestable proof of the performance of the service that shows he distinguished himself conspicuously by...