Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018405
Original file (20140018405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018405 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 89D (Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist) for 2 years and 11 months.

2.  The applicant states a clerical, administrative, or technical error resulted in the MOS error shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request:

* DD Form 214
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 March 2010.  He was trained in and awarded MOS 11B (Infantryman).

2.  The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) contains Explosive Ordinance Disposal Training Detachment, Permanent Order Number 287-14, dated 14 October 2011.  It shows primary MOS (PMOS) 11B was withdrawn and he was awarded PMOS 89D on 14 October 2011.

3.  On 24 September 2014, the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty in the rank and grade of sergeant/E-5 to accept a commission or warrant of the Army.  He had completed 4 years, 6 months, and 9 days of creditable active duty service during this period.

4.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of the applicant's DD Form 214 contains an entry showing he held MOS 89D2O for 0 years and 0 months.

5.  Army Regulation 635-8 (Separation Processing and Documents) prescribes the transition processing function of the military personnel system.  

   a.  Chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-8 provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
   
   b.  Paragraph 5-6k states for item 11 to enter the titles of all MOSs awarded and held for at least 1 year during the current period of service and include for each MOS, the number of years and months held.  For time determinations, 16 or more days counts as a month.  Do not count time in training (basic training, advanced individual training, Basic Officer's Leader Course, or MOS-producing school).  Primary MOS is awarded by Service school completion or by publication of orders awarding the MOS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends item 11 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held PMOS 89D for 2 years and 11 months.

2.  The evidence of record contains official orders which confirms the applicant was awarded PMOS 89D on 14 October 2011.  He continuously held this specialty for 2 years, 11 months, and 10 days, at which time he was discharged from active duty on 24 September 2014.  Therefore, the applicant's claim is corroborated by the evidence of record and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held MOS 89D2O for 2 years and 11 months.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  __x______  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 11 of his DD Form 214 the entry "89D2O EOD Specialist -- 00 YRS 00 MOS";

	b.  adding to item 11 of his DD Form 214:  "89D2O EOD Specialist -- 2 years and 11 months"; and

	c.  issuing the applicant a corrected document to reflect this correction.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018405





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018405



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000098

    Original file (20080000098.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000098 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Department of the Army, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Training Detachment, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, Permanent Order 179-009, dated 28 June 2006, shows that the applicant was awarded the EOD Badge for successful...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019789

    Original file (20080019789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent orders awarded the applicant two awards of the Army Commendation Medal one of which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his second award of the Army Commendation Medal. The evidence of record also shows the applicant's service in Iraq from 25 March 2004 to 24 October 2004 qualified him for award of the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and his second period of service from 19 January to 22 July 2006...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019098

    Original file (20140019098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * Permanent Order 061-10, dated 2 March 2009, awarding him the basic EOD Badge * Permanent Orders 037-03, dated 6 February 2012, awarding him the Senior EOD Badge * Orders 272-003, dated 28 September 2012, promoting him to SSG/E-6 * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 7 May 2013 * DA Form 4187-1-R (Personnel Action Form Addendum) * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Form 702 (DFAS Military Leave and Earnings Statement) for the month of February 2013 * Leave and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080010036

    Original file (AR20080010036.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also notes that his military occupational specialty (MOS) 55D (Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Specialist) was not recorded on his separation document. Item 14 (Military Education) reflects various other military training the applicant completed while on active duty but does not reflect completion of the Basic Explosive Ordnance Disposal-Surface Phase Course or the Basic Explosive Ordnance Disposal-Nuclear Phase Course. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009918

    Original file (20080009918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 1 year, 4 months, and 12 days of active service during his current tour of active duty. Therefore, in the absence of conclusive evidence to show that he possessed the MOS of an infantryman and that he engaged the enemy in combat operations in Iraq, there appears to be no basis to award him the CIB at this time. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000631

    Original file (20120000631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 March 1974 to show award of the Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Badge for length of service as a member of EOD teams. Senior EOD Badge is awarded to any commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier if they have: (1) Been awarded the basic EOD Badge. The evidence of record indicates the applicant: * completed the required training and he was awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01530

    Original file (BC 2014 01530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01530 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 11, Primary Specialty, reflect 3E831 - Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) Helper, 1 year and 2 months and 2F031 - Fuels Apprentice, 2 years and 1 month. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013272

    Original file (20080013272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Although the applicant served in Thailand during the period 1 July 1966 to 16 June 1967, he has not submitted any evidence to show he was serving in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show the Vietnam Service Medal for serving in Thailand.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000878

    Original file (20080000878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the EOD or Glider Badge by proper authority. In this case, the applicant's record is void of any documents, and he has failed to provide independent evidence, showing he completed the required Glider Badge prerequisites, or that he was ever awarded the Glider Badge by proper authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001463

    Original file (20140001463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that the revocation of his EOD Badges is unjust because his conduct was neither grossly negligent nor did he flagrantly violate EOD safety procedures or regulations. His records show that he was awarded the basic EOD Badge on 12 November 2002, the Senior EOD Badge on 20 September 2005, and the Master EOD Badge on 29 October 2010. After reviewing the evidence presented in this case, it appears that the applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence to show...