Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018129
Original file (20140018129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018129 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show her spouse concurred with her election not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) on 24 May 2013.

2.  The applicant states:

* she elected not to participate in the SBP on her DD Form 2656 submitted on 24 May 2013
* when she began receiving retired pay in July 2014 she noticed SBP premiums were taken from her check
* she was never informed of the technicality that the dates must match on the DD Form 2656
* her husband had the DD Form 2656 notarized and he brought it home
* she then completed the form, signed it, and dated it the following day
* dating the DD Form 2656 after her spouse's signature invalidated her request to decline SBP
* she and her husband are both retired Army officers and have other retirement plans
* they do not need SBP
* this error is very costly for a benefit she does not want

3.  The applicant provides:

* letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 13 August 2014
* notarized statement from her husband, dated 7 October 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 16 June 1954.  Having prior active enlisted service in the Regular Army, she was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve on 5 August 1983.  She was appointed in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 9 December 1996.  She was promoted to lieutenant colonel effective 4 May 2001.

2.  Her records contain a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 27 December 2002, which shows she elected option A (Defer – elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation).

3.  She was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 31 May 2004.

4.  She provided a DD Form 2656 which shows she elected not to participate in the SBP on 24 May 2013.  Item 32a (Spouse/Signature) of this form shows her spouse concurred with her election on 23 May 2013.

5.  On 16 June 2014, she was placed on the Retired List in the rank of lieutenant colonel.

6.  She provided a letter from DFAS, dated 13 August 2014, which states:

* that office cannot process her SBP request because her original election received on 29 July 2014 was invalid
* her spouse signed prior to her; therefore, her current SBP must remain as spouse and child

7.  She provided a notarized statement, dated 7 October 2014, from her spouse which states:

* he was aware and in favor of his spouse not enrolling in SBP
* they both signed the form declining the benefit; however, the request was denied since he dated the form one day earlier
* they were not informed of that decision until his wife started receiving her retired pay
* he requests amendment of his wife's records to show she declined the SBP and restoration of her retired pay without deductions for SBP premiums

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

9.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP on 24 May 2013 and her spouse concurred with her election on 23 May 2013.  However, since her spouse signed the DD Form 2656 1 day prior to her signature, the DD Form 2656 was deemed invalid by DFAS.

2.  Since her spouse concurred with her election not to participate in the SBP in May 2013 and he provided a notarized statement in October 2014 again concurring with her election not to participate in the SBP, it would be equitable to correct her records to show her spouse concurred with the SBP election shown on her DD Form 2656, dated 24 May 2013.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 


showing her spouse gave his notarized concurrence with her election not to participate in the SBP on her DD Form 2656, dated 24 May 2013.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018129



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018129



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000166

    Original file (20140000166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her November 2013 Retiree Account Statement shows she currently has SBP coverage for spouse and children and she had made 16 payments toward her 360 months of paid-up SBP coverage. Because she retired by reason of sufficient active duty service for retirement, she made an SBP election in connection with this retirement wherein she elected not to participate in the SBP. The applicant retired on 31 July 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007159

    Original file (20130007159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section IV (Coverage), she elected Option A - I decline to make an election until age 60; c. Section VIII (Member Signature), the applicant and a witness signed the document on 11 April 2013; d. Section IX (Spouse Concurrence): (1) item 20 (Spouse), "I hereby consent in my spouse's RCSBP election as indicated. However, it appears the applicant's spouse was not notified of the applicant's election to decline SBP because there is no evidence of record that shows a spouse concurrence letter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001632

    Original file (20140001632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 2656-5 (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) Election Certificate), dated 12 May 2007, well within 90 days of receipt of his Twenty-Year Letter, clearly and unambiguously shows that he declined to make an election until age 60 and his election to decline participation in the SBP on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 23 September 2013, some eleven months before he reached age 60, conclusively proves by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011314

    Original file (20080011314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a November 2008 notarized statement confirming that she and her husband declined participation in the SBP, a July 2006 Retired Pay Department document, a July 2006 Retiree Account Statement, and a March 2008 statement from the applicant and her spouse. A DD Form 2656, dated 20 March 2006, provided by DFAS, provides the following information: a. at block 26g, that the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP; b. at block 29, that there was a "spouse letter"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018086

    Original file (20130018086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of her SBP premium bill from DFAS and DD Forms 2656, dated 20 and 27 August 2013. On 20 August 2013, the applicant's spouse signed a DD Form 2656 indicating his concurrence with the applicant's election not to participate in the SBP. On 27 August 2013, the applicant's spouse signed a second notarized DD Form 2656 indicating his concurrence with the applicant's election not to participate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001582

    Original file (20090001582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 July 2008, shows an SBP deduction of $268.84 for spouse only coverage, indicating that he was covered under the SBP for spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows that the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. The SBP spouse concurrence statement shows she concurred with his decision after the date he made that decision but not before he retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020241

    Original file (20130020241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that in conjunction with her disability retirement the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 30 July 2013 and elected not to participate in the SBP. However, although her spouse signed the DD Form 2656 on 5 August 2013 indicating he concurred with her election, the notary public dated the form 5 July 2013 as the date she witnessed his signature. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006674

    Original file (20120006674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her retiree account statement is not available for review; however, without her spouse's signature in item 32a of her DD Form 2656, indicating his concurrence with her decision to decline participation in the SBP, her SBP election would automatically default to spouse-only coverage by law. By law, since her spouse did not acknowledge his concurrence of her election not to participate in the SBP prior to her effective date of retirement, it is proper that her SBP election defaulted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016893

    Original file (20130016893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both believed that they made the correct election on the form not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premiums are being deducted from her Army retired pay. Section IX (SBP Election), item 26 (Beneficiary Category(ies)), the applicant failed to make an election in any of the categories (i.e., a through g), although she did indicate in block g (I Elect Not to Participate in SBP) with an "X" that, "I Do Have Eligible Dependents Under The Plan"; c. Section XI (Certification), item 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001471

    Original file (20140001471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. After he retired, on 30 August 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse timely signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized; b. showing DFAS timely received and processed...