Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018114
Original file (20140018114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  25 June 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018114 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he instead be retired by reason of permanent disability.

2.  The applicant states that he has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sleep apnea, two bulging discs in his neck, and pinguecula in both eyes.  He is currently in the process of retiring from his civilian employment due to injuries acquired while in the military.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his last Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report, records related to his application for Combat-Related Special Compensation, and VA and service medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in the rank of staff sergeant when he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom on 23 September 2009.  He continued to serve until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), on 4 May 2011, due to completion of required service and he was returned to his USAR unit.

2.  On 23 February 2012, the applicant was issued his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).

3.  On 30 September 2012, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

4.  The applicant's last evaluation report ended on 31 December 2011 and reflects all "Success" or higher ratings.

5.  The VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant with his application shows that on 22 July 2013 the VA gave the applicant a service-connected disability rating of 70% for PTSD effective 7 August 2012 and 50% for sleep apnea effective 24 July 2012.

6.  A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence to suggest that the applicant was not deemed medically fit for separation or retention at the time of release from active duty in 2011 or his transfer to the Retired Reserve in September 2012.

7.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states, in pertinent part, that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  This regulation also provides, in pertinent part, that when a Soldier is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement, creates a presumption that the Soldier is fit. 

8.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

9.  There is a difference between the VA and the Army disability systems.  The Army’s determination of a Soldier’s physical fitness or unfitness is a factual finding based upon the individual’s ability to perform the duties of his or her grade, rank or rating.  If the Soldier is found to be physically unfit, a disability rating is awarded by the Army and is permanent in nature.  The Army system requires that the Soldier only be rated as the condition(s) exist(s) at the time of the physical evaluation board hearing.  The VA may find a Soldier unfit by reason of service-connected disability and may even initially assign a higher rating.  The VA’s ratings are based upon an individual’s ability to gain employment as a civilian and may fluctuate within a period of time depending on the changes in the disability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been carefully considered and appear to lack merit. 

2.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he was not fit for retention/separation at the time of REFRAD and subsequent transfer to the Retired Reserve or that he should have been processed under the Physical Disability Evaluation System. 

3.  Therefore, it appears that he was properly REFRAD and subsequently transferred to the Retired Reserve based on his request at the time and absent evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 







are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      
      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018114



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018114



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015888

    Original file (20130015888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) to review his medical condition at the time of his separation in November 2011 and that his separation be voided and he be retired by reason of permanent disability. The applicant’s records do not contain a copy of a separation physical. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was unfit for retention at the time of separation, there appears to be no basis to grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008237

    Original file (20130008237.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In an email, dated 17 June 2013, he further states: * he sent a box of VA medical records and a compact disc (CD) with medical records on it * he has over 20 injuries and has taken over 150 medications * all of these injuries/medications were for military injuries * the VA is going to increase his disability compensation to 100% because of his military injuries * he wants the Board to retire him right now 4. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003755

    Original file (20130003755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: Applicant requests that he be given an opportunity to have an MEB and a PEB review his Line of Duty (LOD)/medical documentation in order for him to receive a proper medical disposition upon his discharge from the PRARNG. c. Paragraph 3-2b (processing for separation or retirement from active duty) states disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016355

    Original file (20130016355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record showing he was diagnosed with any medical condition prior to his REFRAD on 28 June 2011. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 310 and 331, permit the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. There also is no evidence showing he could not perform his duties while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011910

    Original file (20100011910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He continues by stating that not only has the VA rated him at 100% for PTSD, they have also rated his other service-connected disabilities at 70% with an effective date of 15 November 2004, which was prior to his retirement on 10 January 2005. If the Soldier is found to be physically unfit, a disability rating is awarded by the Army and is permanent in nature. Department of the Army disability decisions are based upon observations and determinations existing at the time of the PEB hearing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022515

    Original file (20120022515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he was retired due to physical disability. The applicant provides: * Gaston County, Department of Veterans Services brief, dated 28 November 2012 * Two DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty/Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * VA Form 21-526 (Veteran's Application for Compensation and/or Pension) with allied documents * Medical Disqualification for Retention memorandum, dated 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019307

    Original file (20110019307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 December 2011, the Army Physical Disability Agency provided an advisory opinion recommending no relief. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR. The Army must find a member physically unfit before he can be medically retired or separated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004636

    Original file (20140004636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. The applicant was discharged due to his ETS, and there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was unable to perform the duties of his MOS. The applicant has failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013576

    Original file (20110013576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The officer's immediate commander will ensure the medical examination is processed in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501. b. Paragraph 6-7 provides guidance for officers who requests or is scheduled for retirement and required hospitalization or a physical evaluation board (PEB). Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018549

    Original file (20140018549 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he was not fit for retention/separation at the time of REFRAD, discharge from the CAARNG and subsequent transfer to the USAR or that he should have been processed under the Physical Disability Evaluation System. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...