Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017999
Original file (20140017999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:

		BOARD DATE: 18 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017999 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the brother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests payment of the FSM's lost benefits and all the medals he is authorized.

2.  The applicant states that when the FSM's discharge was changed from dishonorable he did not receive his pay for time served.

3.  The applicant provides copes of –

* FSM's birth certificate
* 31 August 1982, Leesburg Police Department letter
* FSM's Durable General Power of Attorney, dated 17 June 1992
* the FSM's death certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 29 January 1954, The FSM was convicted by a general court-martial, in accordance with his plea of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 3 August 1953 to 16 January 1954.  He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge (DD), forfeiture of all pay and allowances and confinement for six months.  The Army Board of Review affirmed the finding of guilty and the sentence on 25 February 1954.

3.  ABCMR Docket Number AC90-08397A, dated 20 May 1982, shows his request for an upgrade of his DD was denied.  The Record of Proceedings (ROP) further shows that:

	a.  The Commander, Army Reserve Center, was requested to administratively correct the FSM's records to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and all the additional awards and decorations he was entitled to for his combat service during World War II and the Korean Conflict.

	b.  While an upgrade of his DD was denied, the Board granted approval to change his records to show previous periods of active duty as honorable and to issue him a certificate showing he was honorably discharged on 18 September 1951 as a corporal. 

	c.  A memorandum addressed to the Commander, U.S. Army Reserve Center requested necessary action be taken to effect the records corrections and directed that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) be furnished a copy of the correction notification letter so that settlement of any monies due may be accomplished.   

4.  A 22 April 1998 ABCMR letter erroneously informed the applicant the FSM's discharge was upgraded to honorable on 20 May 1992.

5.  A 15 December 1999 ABCMR letter addressed to a Member of Congress clarifies the 22 April 1998 letter and informs the Congressman that the Board found the FSM's DD correct and just.  The Board did, however, direct the FSM be issued an honorable discharge certificate for a prior honorable period of service for which he did not have a certificate.  The letter further states that the FSM was not due any back pay, and a careful reading of the letter reveals the ABCMR did not say any monies are due, but only states as a standard requirement that the correction issuing agency was to notify DFAS in the event monies are due. 

6.  ABCMR Docket Number AR20040006627, dated 14 April 2005 shows the applicant's request for an honorable discharge based on clemency for his deceased brother was denied.

7.  The applicant's 3 October 2011 application for all the FSM's benefits from 1951 until his death was administratively closed on 7 November 2011.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant did not provide any evidence to show the FSM was due any back pay or other benefits.  

2.  The FSM's DD was not upgraded as the applicant asserts.  All previous requests for an upgrade of the FSM's DD were denied.

3.  In view of the above, this request should be denied. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005678



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017999



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014735

    Original file (20090014735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 11 May 2009 HRC letter is correct, the FSM did not file an RCSBP election in 1975 when he received his 20-year letter. Therefore, based on the above facts and findings, it is appropriate to correct the records to show: a. the FSM was entitled to receipt of retired pay at age 60 based on 30 qualifying years of service and 2,931 retirement points; b. he elected to receive retired pay effective 5 September 1994 and was transferred to the Retired List at that time; c. the FSM elected to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003719

    Original file (20090003719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 1 September 1979, the FSM authenticated a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) that shows he was married, that he elected spouse only coverage, that he elected to provide an annuity based on the full amount of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002950

    Original file (20070002950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his deceased brother's, a former service member (FSM), military records to show that he was discharged from enlisted status to accept a battlefield commission. A DD Form 214 for the FSM's period of service ending on 23 February 1951, indicates that he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-365, for the convenience of the government to accept a commission in the Army of the United States. The letter, dated 3 May 1954, shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009349

    Original file (20120009349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, after a telephone conversation with the case analyst of record, states: * Her deceased husband, the FSM, was previously married to Ferxxxxxx but they were divorced on 16 September 1976 * Their divorce decree stated she (Ferxxxxxx) would receive a portion of the FSM's retired pay * The FSM's former spouse, Ferxxxxxx, died on 23 December 2000 but she (the applicant) was not aware of her death until recently * She filed a claim with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018322

    Original file (20080018322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 September 2008, by letter, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, VA notified the applicant that after a careful review of the documentation submitted by him, it was determined that the collapse of the bridge was not influenced by enemy action or sabotage and that the report of interment erroneously showed the date of death as 17 April 1951 as a result of a shrapnel wound to the leg, but the evidence suggests that the FSM died on 30 March 1951 as a result of drowning. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014647

    Original file (20090014647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 September 1952, the FSM accepted an appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the U.S. Army in the infantry branch and was ordered to active duty. There is no record to show the applicant completed and filed with DFAS a request for deemed election within 1 year of her divorce from the FSM. As the applicant was receiving a partial payment of her former spouse's retired pay based on filing the divorce decree, it is reasonable to assume she thought she had made a deemed election...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022984

    Original file (20120022984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This research confirmed that DFAS did not receive an annuity application from her mother or a written claim for the annuity within 6 years of the FSM's death. As such, and only as a matter of equity, the FSM's records should be corrected to show his widow, the applicant's deceased mother, made a timely request for payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death and her request was received and processed by DFAS shortly after the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020624

    Original file (20110020624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant and the FSM's divorce decree, dated 9 August 2002, stipulated the FSM would continue SBP coverage for the applicant. Therefore, she was ineligible to be the FSM's former spouse SBP beneficiary and also not entitled to receive an SBP annuity from his military retired pay account. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000905

    Original file (20110000905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The response from DFAS shows that the following was not on file: * DA Form 4240 * SBP debt * Death certificate * No application from the applicant for SBP benefits 10. The evidence also shows he died on 27 September 1998 and his death was not reported to DFAS in a timely manner and his spouse continued to collect his full retirement pay until it was stopped in August 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000590

    Original file (20140000590.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * FSM and applicant's marriage certificate * FSM and applicant's divorce decree * FSM's death certificate * FSM's Retiree Account Statement, dated 6 May 1996 * FSM's Retiree Account Statement, dated 25 March 2002 * letter from the FSM to the Army Finance and Accounting Center (currently known as the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)), dated 30 June 1994 * letter to the applicant...