Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017824
Original file (20140017824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	

		BOARD DATE:  2 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017824


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, consideration by a special selection board (SSB) for promotion to captain (CPT) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and that upon promotion she should be reinstated as a commissioned officer in the USAR.

2.  The applicant states she was non-selected for promotion to captain due to not being educationally qualified even though her degree had been provided to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) and her command S-1 (Personnel Officer).  This non-selection resulted in her being discharged from the USAR.  She is not able to fulfill her condition of employment as a military technician in the Reserve.  She further contends that she was employed overseas from September 2010 to September 2014 and had made an effort in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 to resolved this issue, but could not do so because of the time and location differences.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Email communications between herself and various Army offices, dated between 2010 and 2014 (11 pages)
* Memorandum for the applicant notifying her of 1st time non-select for promotion to captain, dated 1 May 2010
* A Diploma, Bachelor of Science, dated 15 May 2010
* Memorandum for the applicant notifying her of 2nd time non-select for promotion to captain, copy undated
* Military Personnel Message Number 10-179, fiscal Year 2011, Reserve Component CaptainÂ…Competitive Categories Promotion Selection Boards,(first page only)
* Orders D-10-117600, HRC, dated 27 October 2011
* Memorandum for this Board, Request for an Exception to Policy, dated   12 September 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, Signal Corps in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT).  She accepted her appointment on 22 January 2005.

2.  A DA Form 1059, (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 
26 August 2005, shows the applicant successfully completed the Signal Officer Basic Course.

3.  Orders B-01-700074, HRC, dated 4 January 2007, announced the applicant's promotion to first lieutenant (1LT) with an effective date and date of rank of 
21 January 2007.

4.  On 31 May 2009, the applicant entered active duty as a Reserve officer assigned at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  On 30 May 2010, she was released from active duty.

5.  In a memorandum dated 1 May 2010, as provided by the applicant and filed in her official military personnel file (OMPF), she was notified of her first non-selection for promotion to CPT.

6.  A diploma, as provided by the applicant and filed in her OMPF, dated 15 May 2010, indicates she completed the requirements for a Bachelor of Science degree from Liberty University.

7.  An email provided by the applicant, dated 24 September 2010, addressed to the CPT Army Promotion Board, states she had attached a copy of her college degree.

8.  In an undated memorandum, as provided by the applicant and filed in her OMPF, effective 2 November 2010, she was notified of her second non-selection for promotion to CPT.  This memorandum advised her that she would be retained on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) until the end of her original military service obligation.

9.  Orders 11-157-00003, 63rd Regional Support Command, dated 6 June 2011, announced the applicant's voluntary transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) effective 30 June 2011.

10.  Orders D-10-117600, HRC, dated 27 October 2011, announced the applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR, effective 26 October 2011.

11.  An advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions, HRC, dated 21 November 2014.

	a.  The opinion stated that a review of their records revealed the applicant's was erroneously coded during the promotion process for consideration for CPT in fiscal year 2011, as not being educationally qualified based on her civilian education.  This error entitles her to reconsideration by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the FY 2011 promotion selection criteria.  However, such reconsideration must be directed by this Board.

	b.  The opinion stated that Reserve officers who were deemed not educationally qualified were automatically non-selected for promotion.  Approving this action is no guarantee of selection for promotion.

	c.  Any adjustment of rank, associated back-pay or allowances may only occur upon a favorable outcome that leads to a promotion to CPT under the FY 2011 criteria.

	d.  Any determination to revoke any discharge order or to return an individual to active/reserve status is at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army through this Board.

12.  On 24 November 2014, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant for her information and opportunity to respond.  In a memorandum dated 4 December 2014, the applicant provided the following comments:

	a.  She asks this Board to accept the advisory opinion in part.  She argues that her current status as a former officer works against her.  If, after all that has been done to resolve the issue, she is not selected for promotion, she would be disappointed.

	b.  She desires to be returned to a Reserve status should this Board decide to revoke her discharge orders.

	c.  The entire experience has tested her emotions.  She was happy to see that the erroneous coding of her education status was recognized.
	d.  She realizes that restoring her to Reserve status may not help her regain the job she lost, but it would make her whole. 

13.  Army Regulation 135-155 states promotion consideration reconsideration by an SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error, which existed in the record at the time of consideration.  The regulation further specifies that the Chief, DA Promotions, is the approval authority for all current criteria requests for exception to non-statutory promotion requirements (i.e., military education), and that requests must contain complete justification and be received prior to the board convening date.

	a.  Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date.

	b.  Table 2-1 states for promotion from 1LT to CPT, the minimum years in the lower grade is 2 years and the maximum years in the lower grade is 5 years. 

	c.  Table 2-2 states the military educational requirements from 1LT to CPT is a resident officer basic course.

14.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14504 states a first lieutenant on the RASL of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps or a lieutenant (junior grade) on the RASL of the Navy who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time and whose name is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall be separated in accordance with section 14513 of this title not later than the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows that the applicant attained her Bachelor of Science degree in May 2010 and provided it to the promotion board in or about September 2010.  However, her records remained coded to show she did not have this degree and she was consequently non-selected for promotion to CPT.  Based on this administrative error, her military records should be considered by an SSB for promotion to CPT under the FY 2011 criteria.

2.  Should she be selected for this promotion, it would be appropriate to then revoke the orders that discharged her from the USAR and to reinstate her as a CPT in the USAR with no loss of time in service and with the same date of rank and effective date she would have had had she been properly considered by the FY 2011 promotion board.

3.  Should the applicant fail to be selected for promotion by the SSB, she should be accordingly so notified.

BOARD VOTE:

__X______  __X______  __X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  submitting her record to a duly-constituted SSB for promotion reconsideration to CPT based on the FY 2011 promotion criteria;

	b.  if she is selected for promotion, correcting her records to show she met all the eligibility criteria for promotion (e.g., being assigned to a CPT's position or being in an active status) effective the date of release of the applicable promotion selection board, promoting her to CPT with the appropriate date of rank, and paying her any associated back pay and allowances as a result of the corrections; and

	c.  if selected and she meets all prerequisites for promotion, her records should be further corrected by:

		(1)  showing the October 2011 discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve is void and of no force or effect,

		(2)  crediting her with qualifying service for Reserve retirement for her respective retirement years from the date of her now-voided discharge to the date of return to the active Reserve;

		(3)  placing an adequate explanation in her records explaining the gap in her officer evaluation reports from the dates of her now-voided discharge to the date of return to an active Reserve status, showing the gap was caused due to no fault of the applicant, and ensuring she is not prejudiced in the consideration of any future personnel actions; and

	d.  If she is not selected by the duly-constituted SSB she should be so notified.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015946



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017824



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004011

    Original file (20110004011.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * USAR Discharge Orders * College Transcripts * Honorable Discharge Certificate * E-mail exchanged with various individuals CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. She was considered for promotion to CPT by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Reserve Components Selection Promotion Board (RCSB) that convened on 6 November 2007; the board results were released on 31 December 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014753

    Original file (20130014753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was not selected for promotion to CPT with no reason given. She states that an error occurred in her board file whereby her BSN was not filed prior to the convene date of the promotion selection board. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers) states promotion consideration or reconsideration by an SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the record at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003223

    Original file (20150003223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting his record to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003421

    Original file (20130003421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following: * Revocation of her retirement orders * Reinstatement on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) * Promotion consideration to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by a Special Selection Board (SSB) 2. Continuation for CPT and MAJ will normally be for 3 years from the approval date of the selective continuation board by which the officer is recommended for continuation. If selected, her records should be corrected to show she was continued in the Reserve until she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015946

    Original file (20130015946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 2-2 states to qualify for selection, commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) must complete the military educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the day before the selection board convene date. The Fiscal Year 2013 promotion board convened on 27 November 2012 and considered her non-educationally qualified and she was again not selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014906

    Original file (20120014906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Memorandum, dated 31 August 2006, Subject: Reserve Component Promotion Board Military Education (MILED) Waiver Guidance states that, in accordance with paragraph 2-15b of Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), the Chief, Office of Promotions, may grant waivers for non-statutory MILED promotion requirements...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006954

    Original file (20140006954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She stated that she also had two out of six years of OERs that rated her best qualified for promotion. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to CPT and extension in the USAR to complete 20 years of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was passed over for promotion to CPT by the FY 2011, 2012, and 2013, RC, CPT, AMEDD Promotion Selection Boards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007618

    Original file (20120007618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was a first lieutenant (1LT) in the Alaska Army National Guard (AKARNG). The Board obtained an advisory opinion from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and mailed her a copy at her Alaska address. It is an unavoidable fact that some officers considered for promotion will not be selected for promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002109

    Original file (20140002109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated HRC conducted a review of the applicant's records and determined his current DOR of 29 August 2011 was correct; however, he may require a Special Selection Board (SSB). 29 August 2011 was the approval date of the Board and the earliest he could be promoted IAW Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21. c. The applicant is requesting that the 7 year maximum years of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016646

    Original file (20130016646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Memorandum, dated 2 August 2013, the CG of the 79th USAR Sustainment Support Command recommended approval of the applicant's request for reconsideration for promotion to CPT based on her civilian education requirement being met. The TIG requirements to CPT for the promotion boards conducted for the period 2011-2016 were accelerated based on the memoranda from the Army Reserve G-1, dated 25 March 2010 and 25 June 2010, which are in contrast with the TIG requirements published in Army...