Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017700
Original file (20140017700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017700 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by deleting the 3 days of lost time.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his unit was being deployed to Vietnam from Okinawa and he was the only one being sent home and was gone only 3 hours.  However, he was charged with being absent without leave from 2 November to 
4 November 1964 when in fact he was gone only 3 hours.  He also states the error is preventing employment opportunities.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 April 1962 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his one-station unit training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Gordon, Georgia and his parachute training at Fort Benning, Georgia and was transferred to Okinawa on 4 November 1962.

3.  On 10 March 1964, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent from his unit without proper authority from 10 March to 11 March 1964.  The applicant did not appeal his punishment.

4.  On 13 April 1964, NJP was imposed against the applicant for missing movement of the USS Barrett on 10 April 1964.  He did not appeal his punishment.

5.  He departed Okinawa on 23 April 1964 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

6.  On 5 November 1964, NJP was imposed against him for being AWOL from    2 November to 5 November 1964.  The applicant did not appeal his punishment.

7.  On 22 December 1964, he was convicted by a special court-martial of stealing another Soldier’s boots.

8.  On 28 January 1965, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of breaking restriction.

9.  On 26 March 1965, NJP was imposed against him for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty.

10.  On 5 May 1965, he was honorably discharged due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 3 years and 3 days of active service with   3 days of lost time due to AWOL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 erroneously reflects 3 days of lost time has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  On 5 November 1964, while at Fort Campbell, NJP was imposed against him for being AWOL from 2 November to 5 November 1964.  The applicant did not appeal his punishment.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect that lost time and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence to show otherwise.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017700





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017700



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081395C070215

    Original file (2002081395C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 18 May 1966, the applicant's commander initiated a recommendation to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil/military authorities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012896

    Original file (20140012896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of active service and he had 4 days of lost time from 27 July to 30 July 1964. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001045

    Original file (20110001045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time he had completed 4 years, 5 months, and 3 days total active service. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted at a special court-martial and also at three summary courts-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008869C070208

    Original file (20040008869C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 August 1962, he was assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia for completion of airborne training. He had completed 2 years, 1 month and 16 days of active military service. The available evidence does not indicate the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board under that board's 15-year statute of limitation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018196

    Original file (20110018196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 13 November 1957, for 3 years. On 10 April 1965, he was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and issued a BCD after the conviction and sentence were affirmed. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084250C070212

    Original file (2003084250C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board convened on 24 April 1957 and after hearing testimony from the applicant, whereas he stated that he wanted out of the Army, the board of officers found that he was unfit for further service and recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. The applicant's commander submitted a recommendation to discharge him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018002

    Original file (20090018002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 23 September 1969 to 22 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084674C070212

    Original file (2003084674C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 October 1964, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for failure to maintain his personal clothing. He applied to this Board and on 11 December 1968, this Board also denied his appeal. That the Department issue to him an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, dated 24 November 1965, in lieu of the general discharge of the same date held by him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000197

    Original file (20090000197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military personnel records contain a copy of Headquarters, Fort Ord, California, General Court-Martial Order Number 68, dated 10 September 1965, which documents the following charge, specification, pleas, findings, sentence, and action. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the 3-week Basic Airborne course and he was awarded the Parachutist Badge by Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Training Center, Fort Benning, Special Orders 35, dated 14 February 1963. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056121C070420

    Original file (2001056121C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. In April 1966 he went absent without leave (AWOL) for 2 days and nonjudicial punishment was again imposed against him, which resulted in his being reduced to the pay grade of E-2.