Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017630
Original file (20140017630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017630 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a review of his 1973 discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). 

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from the USAR on 16 August 1973 for failure to be promoted to first lieutenant (1LT).  He was eligible for promotion to 1LT at the time of discharge but his enlistment expired.  The inaccurate discharge adversely affected his service.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record)
* Letter Orders Number 08-1232763
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR for 6 years on 1 February 1966.  He entered active duty on 12 April 1967 and he held military occupational specialty 71H (Personnel Specialist). 

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 19 August 1967 and returned to the USAR to complete his remaining obligation. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 months and 8 days of total active service. 

4.  In November 1969, he submitted a DA Form 61 (Application for Appointment) and requested appointment as a commissioned officer of the Army Reserve.  His application was favorably considered. 

5.  On 8 August 1970, Headquarters, First Army, Fort Meade, MD published Special Orders Number 220 honorably discharging him from the USAR effective 11 July 1970 for the purpose of accepting an appointment as a Reserve officer. 

6.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT) and executed an oath of office on 12 July 1970.  

7.  Following his appointment, he was assigned as a platoon leader to Company B, 6th Battalion, 68th Armor, in Pennsylvania. 

8.  On 19 August 1973, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center published Letter Orders Number              08-1232763 ordering his honorable discharge from the USAR effective 16 August 1973 in accordance with Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers), paragraph 4-6, by reason of failure to qualify for promotion to 1LT. 

9.  Army Regulation 135-175 prescribes the policies, criteria, and procedures governing the separation of Reserve offices of the Army.  Paragraph 4-6 (Failure to qualify for promotion to first lieutenant) states an officer in the grade of second lieutenant who has completed the required statutory military service obligation will be discharged upon being considered but not recommended for promotion by the appropriate commander on or before the date upon which the officer completes 3 years of promotion service (Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3819).

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3819 (Army Reserve officers: discharge for failure of promotion to first lieutenant) states:

	a.  Except as provided in sections 1005 and 1006 of this title, each second lieutenant of the Army Reserve who is in an active status and not on the active-duty list shall be discharged from his reserve appointment if he is not promoted before or on the date on which he completes three years of service computed under section 3360(b) of this title.

	b.  Except as provided by section 1006 of this title, each second lieutenant of the Army Reserve who is on the active-duty list of the Army and is found not qualified for promotion to the reserve grade of first lieutenant shall be discharged from his reserve appointment not later than the end of the 18-month period beginning on the date on which he is first found not qualified for promotion to that grade, unless he is promoted to that grade before the end of that period.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's enlisted service began on 1 February 1966 and terminated on 11 July 1970, the day before he was appointed as a commissioned officer.  This enlisted service had no bearing on his subsequent service as a commissioned officer.

2.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of 2LT on 12 July 1970.  By July 1973, he had failed to be promoted to 1LT.  As required by law and regulation, he was honorably discharged on 16 August 1973 for failing to qualify for promotion to 1LT.

3.  The applicant was properly discharged from the USAR.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in his separation.  Therefore, his discharge was appropriate and no record correction is required or necessary. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  __X______  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017630





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017630



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087266C070212

    Original file (2003087266C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 October 1995, while still on profile, counsel states that the applicant failed his alternate APFT. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed a record APFT on 15 October 1995 and again on 3 August 1997. There is no evidence of record that the applicant ever passed a record APFT from the date of his appointment to the date of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019443

    Original file (20100019443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records to be corrected by removing any references to show he was a member of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records by showing that he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 22 December 1975 due to completion of his service obligation and to remove all documents related to his service in the USAR after that date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010983

    Original file (20070010983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief further stated that The New Jersey Adjutant General approved the Federal recognition examining board proceedings for the officer to be initially appointed effective 23 July 2004 and the officer executed his oath of office, also on 23 July 2004. The Chief also stated that he could not make a recommendation regarding the applicant's promotion to 1LT since the applicant was transferred to the USAR and that in accordance with Army Regulation 135-188 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020082

    Original file (20110020082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain the promotion orders showing the promotion date. He provided a memorandum he submitted to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 11 June 1999, requesting reconsideration for promotion to CPT. He provided a memorandum he received from an official at the USAR Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 3 November 1999, stating this memorandum was in response to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066976C070402

    Original file (2002066976C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He continues by stating that is currently serving in a USAR Military Police Unit in the pay grade of E-5 and was informed that he was twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of 1LT because his records did not indicate that he had completed the officer basic course (OBC). On 31 July 1992, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) sent the applicant a notice informing him that his records did not indicate that he had completed the OBC and that he was not selected for promotion. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012980

    Original file (20090012980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090012980 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he believes he was promoted to 1LT in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) after leaving active duty. The applicant was promoted after leaving active duty; therefore, his promotion to 1LT should not be reflected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072743C070403

    Original file (2002072743C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 1997, the OKARNG issued a NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) honorably discharging the applicant from the OKARNG as a SGT, pay grade E-5, by reason of the individual's request. The investigation further substantiated that: the applicant submitted false information on his application for Army National Guard federal recognition in January 1987 by stating “No” to the question, “Have you ever been arrested or convicted by a civil court of other than minor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067473C070402

    Original file (2002067473C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 135-91 (Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures), paragraph 3-2a(2), states that it is the responsibility of soldiers assigned to control groups to promptly report any change of address to the commander, Army Reserve Personnel Command. There is no personal appearance authorized before an officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019633

    Original file (20100019633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of memoranda, dated 29 January 1993 and 1 March 1994, from his records that show he was non-selected for promotion to captain (CPT) twice. On 24 February 1992, his immediate commander initiated a request to separate him in accordance with paragraph 2-12 of Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers). On 1 March 1994, by memorandum also addressed to the applicant at his Birmingham, AL address, HRC-STL again notified him that he was considered for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010805

    Original file (20080010805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Federal Recognition date be backdated to 29 September 2004 and that his Federal Recognition date as a Medical Service Corps (MS) officer be back dated to 23 February 2006. It appears, had the original Federal Recognition paperwork been processed to completion when he was appointed as an MS 2LT, on 22 February 2006, he would have been granted Federal Recognition effective 22 February 2006, with a DOR of 21 May 2005, based on his prior commissioned service. As...