Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017592
Original file (20140017592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  14 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017592 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her maiden name of Cxxxx instead of her married name of Pxxxxx.

2.  The applicant states she is no longer married and, due to personal circumstances, no longer wishes to have her last name shown as Pxxxxx.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 WS-Automated (DD Form 214 Worksheet).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 July 2001 using her maiden name of Cxxxx.  After completing initial training, she was awarded military occupational specialty 92G (Food Service Specialist).  The highest rank/grade held was specialist/E-4.

3.  A memorandum, dated 18 January 2006, from the 90th Personnel Services Battalion, stated a name change had been approved for the applicant.  Effective that date her last name was Pxxxxx.

4.  She was discharged on 5 April 2006.  Her DD Form 214 shows:

* item 1 (Name), Pxxxxx, [applicant's first and middle name]
* item 18 (Remarks), other name(s) of record:  Cxxxx, [applicant's first and middle name]

5.  The applicant provides no documentation showing either a divorce or when it took place.  Her application to the Board, however, shows the date of discovery for this issue was 15 September 2014.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214.  The name is to be entered as shown on the Enlisted Record Brief.  However, a comparison should be made with what name is shown on the enlistment contract to ascertain whether a name change has occurred. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 214 is a document meant to reflect what is accurate at the time of separation (emphasis added).  Although the applicant provides no evidence of a divorce, she implies it occurred after her discharge as the date of discovery on her application is shown as 15 September 2014 (emphasis added).

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  Absent convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's last name at the time of her discharge was her married last name.  Her DD Form 214 does also show her maiden name as another name of record. 

3.  While it is understood that she desires to now record her current last name, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017592





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017592



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019200

    Original file (20140019200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant provides evidence of a divorce, it occurred after her retirement from service (emphasis added). __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019200 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019200 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016887

    Original file (20130016887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * Self-authored statement * Judgment of Change of Name * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Social Security Number Card * Louisiana Driver’s License CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The military documents that are on file in his Army Military Human Resource Record, formerly known as the official military personnel file, shows he served and was released from the Army under the name shown on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004974

    Original file (20120004974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to reflect her name change. Her last name changed from "Bar__" to "Mor__" in her service records; however, her name was then recorded in her service records as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__." The applicant's service personnel records show: * she enlisted under her maiden name of "Bar__, Kar__ Eli__" * her name for an unknown reason was changed in marriage to "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" * she retired as "Mor__, Kar__ Bar__" 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008363

    Original file (20130008363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "Norman" instead of "Howard." The evidence of record shows the applicant's last name was "Norman" at the time of her initial enlistment in the Regular Army; however, prior to her release from active duty she married on 9 March 1982 and changed her last name to "Howard" as shown on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1982. ABCMR Record of Proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021704

    Original file (20120021704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021704 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She states, in effect, she is divorced and she would like her retirement DD Form 214 to reflect her maiden name. Her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows she enlisted using her maiden name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002247

    Original file (20090002247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the document provided by the applicant is insufficient to warrant a change to the name recorded in her military service records and on her discharge document. In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011226

    Original file (20080011226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her last name be changed on her military records. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080011226 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002830

    Original file (20150002830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be issued a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) based on the information that is contained on her DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), that her last name be changed to her maiden name, and a personal appearance hearing. The applicant states, in effect that: * she was issued a DD Form 215 to correct errors on her DD Form 214; however, it was not incorporated into her original DD Form 214 (which corrected her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018762

    Original file (20100018762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her maiden name. However, her DD Form 214 must reflect her service as it existed on the date of her discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016873

    Original file (20090016873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 14 September 2001, shows in item 2 (Name - Last, First, Middle Name, (and Maiden, if any), Jr., Sr., etc.) the applicant's name is recorded as "H------, K------- R--." In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant's military service records reflect the correct name (at the time) under which military service was performed.