Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017077
Original file (20140017077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 June 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017077 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show continuance of Special Selection Board (SSB) Report RS1312-10 and reinstatement as a Reserve commissioned officer, if selected for promotion to colonel (COL)/pay grade (PG) O-6.

2.  The applicant states he was selected for promotion to COL (O-6) by the Fiscal Year 2010 (FY10) Promotion Selection Board (PSB).

   a.  After a year-long post-selection review, his name was removed from the promotion list and he was instructed that this action would be considered as a one-time non-select.  However, his mandatory retirement date (MRD) was increased to 30 years.

   b.  He was not considered for promotion by the FY12 PSB due to error.  He requested an SSB; however, the SSB process was incomplete when his MRD was returned to 28 years.  As a result, he was retired on 22 August 2014.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY, letter, dated 10 September 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer, in the rank of second lieutenant, on 16 May 1986.  Upon completion of training he was branch detailed in the Engineer Corps.
2.  He was promoted to lieutenant colonel/PG O-5 on 30 December 2005.

3.  On 16 June 2011, the Chief, Reserve Retirements, HRC, Fort Knox, KY, notified the applicant that his eligibility for retired pay had been established upon attaining ageĀ 60 (a 20-Year letter).

4.  A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) revealed that a copy of HRC, Fort Knox, KY, memorandum, dated 23 June 2011, subject:  Promotion Review Board (PRB) Results (PRB 1103-03) with enclosures is filed in the restricted folder.  The documents show, in pertinent part:

   a.  He was selected for promotion to COL by the FY10 COL Army Promotion List (APL) Non-Active/Guard Reserve (AGR) PSB that recessed on 30 July 2010.

   b.  The promotion post-board screen identified the applicant as having unfavorable information in his file.
   
    	(1)  The file evaluation/basis for consideration was a military police (MP) report, dated 3 May 2002, that substantiated the applicant filed a false travel claim in what appeared to be fraud on the U.S. Government.

    	(2)  Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Riley, KS, memorandum, dated 2 July 2003, shows the commanding general (BrigadierĀ General D____ E. H____) issued an administrative reprimand to the applicant for filing a false travel voucher.  The basis for the reprimand was misconduct detailed in an MP report and a Commander's Inquiry directed by the applicant's brigade commander on 21 April 2003.

   c.  On 22 January 2011, the applicant submitted his response for consideration by the PRB, along with supporting documents.

   d.  The applicant's file was referred to a PRB for reconsideration of the applicant's promotion status.

   e.  On 18 March 2011, the PRB recommended the applicant be removed from the FY10 COL Army Reserve (AR) Non-AGR, Standing Promotion List.

   f.  On 21 June 2011, the Secretary of the Army directed the removal of the applicant from the FY10 COL, APL, AR Non-AGR Promotion List, under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14310, Executive Order 12396 (Defense Officer Personnel Management), and Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 3-18a.
   g.  On 23 June 2011, the Chief, Officer Promotions, Special Actions, HRC, notified the applicant of the Secretary of the Army's decision.  He also informed him that in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 629, an officer who is removed from the promotion list under this section continues to be eligible for consideration for promotion.  However, if such an officer is not recommended for promotion by the next regular promotion PSB, he shall be considered to have twice failed selection for promotion.

5.  The applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 23 August 2014.

6.  In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of an HRC, Fort Knox, KY letter, dated 10 September 2014, that shows the Chief, Officer Promotions, Special Actions, notified the applicant that, "[y]ou were eligible for promotion consideration by SSB under the 2012 criteria due to omission by Department of the Army Reserve Components [RC] Selection Board for the cited year.  Prior to approval of your special board report (RS1312-10), you were transferred to a Retired status.  Title 10, U.S. Code prohibits special boards for 'former officers' without directive/continuance from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  If a former officer is selected by a special board, it is at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army via the ABCMR to determine if the discharge/retirement order should be revoked, the officer may upon request be returned to the Active Duty List (ADL) or the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) respectively, if fully eligible and promoted provided he/she meets all other promotion requirements."  He was also provided information on the procedures for submitting an application to the ABCMR.

7.  U.S. Code, Title 10, provides in:

* section 629 (Removal from a list of officers recommended for promotion):

* subparagraph a (Removal by President), the President may remove the name of any officer from a list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board convened under this chapter.
* subparagraph d (Administrative Removal), under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the ADL is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred to a retired status after having been recommended for promotion to a higher grade under this chapter, but before being promoted, the officer's name shall be administratively removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board.


* subparagraph e (Continued Eligibility for Promotion), an officer whose name is removed from a list under subsection a, b, or c continues to be eligible for consideration for promotion.  If he is recommended for promotion by the next selection board convened for his grade and competitive category and he is promoted, the Secretary of the military department concerned may, upon such promotion, grant him the same date of rank, the same effective date for the pay and allowances of the grade to which promoted, and the same position on the ADL as he would have had if his name had not been so removed.  If such an officer who is in a grade below the grade of COL or, in the case of the Navy, captain is not recommended for promotion by the next selection board convened for his grade and competitive category, or if his name is again removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion, or if the Senate again does not give its advice and consent to his promotion, he shall be considered for all purposes to have twice failed of selection for promotion.

* section 14310 (Removal of officers from a list of officers recommended for promotion):

* subparagraph a (Removal by President), the President may remove the name of any officer from a promotion list at any time before the date on which the officer is promoted.
* subparagraph d (Administrative Removal), under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the RASL is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred to a retired status after having been recommended for promotion to a higher grade under this chapter or having been found qualified for Federal recognition in the higher grade under title 32, but before being promoted, the officer's name shall be administratively removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board.
* subparagraph e (Continued Eligibility for Promotion), an officer whose name is removed from a list under subsection a, b, or c continues to be eligible for consideration for promotion.  If that officer is recommended for promotion by the next selection board convened for that officer's grade and competitive category and the officer is promoted, the Secretary of the military department concerned may, upon the promotion, grant the officer the same date of rank, the same effective date for the pay and allowances of the grade to which promoted, and the same position on the RASL, as the officer would have had if the officer's name had not been removed from the list.

* section 14507 (Removal from the RASL for years of service:  reserve lieutenant colonels and colonels of the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps and reserve commanders and captains of the Navy):

* subparagraph a (Lieutenant Colonels and Commanders), unless continued on the RASL under section 14701 or 14702 of this title or retained as provided in section 12646 or 12686 of this title, each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of lieutenant colonel or commander and who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall (if not earlier removed from the RASL) be removed from that list under section 14514 of this title on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 
28 years of commissioned service.
* subparagraph b (Colonels and Navy Captains), unless continued on the RASL under section 14701 or 14702 of this title or retained as provided in section 12646 or 12686 of this title, each reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of colonel, and each reserve officer of the Navy who holds the grade of captain, and who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade shall (if not earlier removed from the RASL) be removed from that list under section 14514 of this title on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 30 years of commissioned service.  This subsection does not apply to the adjutant general or assistant adjutants general of a State.

8.  Executive Order 12396, dated 9 December 1982, shows that by the authority vested in the President of the United States of America by Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, and in order to delegate certain functions concerning the appointment, promotion, and retirement of commissioned officers of the Armed Forces, it was ordered in:

* Section 1:  The Secretary of Defense is designated to perform, without approval, ratification, or other action by the President, the following functions vested in the President:  The authority vested in the President by Section 629(a) of Title 10 of the U.S. Code, to remove the name of any officer from a promotion list to any grade below commodore or brigadier general.
* Section 3:  The authority delegated to the Secretary of Defense by this Order may be redelegated to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, any of the Assistant Secretaries of Defense, and to any of the Secretaries of the military departments who may further subdelegate such authority to subordinates who are appointed to their office by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

9.  Army Regulation 135-155, Chapter 3 (Board Schedules and Procedures) provides in:

* paragraph 3-18 that commanders and the Commander, HRC, Office of Promotions (RC), will continuously review promotion lists to ensure that no officer is promoted who has become mentally, physically, morally, or professionally disqualified after being selected.  It also provides commanders and the Commander, HRC, Chief, Office of Promotions (RC), may recommend officers for removal for, in pertinent part, a memorandum of reprimand or any adverse documentation being placed in the OMPF.
* paragraph 3-19 that officers and warrant officers who have either failed of selection for promotion, or who were erroneously not considered for promotion through administrative error may be reconsidered for promotion by either a promotion advisory board or an SSB, as appropriate.  These boards are convened to correct/prevent an injustice to an officer or former officer who was eligible for promotion, but whose records through error, were not submitted to a mandatory promotion selection board for consideration.  It also shows records of officers or former officers will be referred for SSB action when the Officer of Promotions (RC) determines, in pertinent part, that the ABCMR requests such a referral.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show  the continuance of SSB Report RS1312-10 and his reinstatement as a Reserve commissioned officer, if selected for promotion to COL (O-6).

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion by the FY10 COL APL AR Non-AGR PSB.

   a.  As a result of the promotion post-board screen process, he was identified as having unfavorable information in his file.  His file was referred to a PRB for reconsideration of the applicant's promotion status.  The PRB recommended his removal from the FY10 COL (AR) Non-AGR, Standing Promotion List.

   b.  On 21 June 2011, the Secretary of the Army directed the removal of the applicant from the FY10 COL, APL, AR Non-AGR Promotion List.  He was also informed that he would continue to be eligible for consideration for promotion to COL as a one-time non-select for promotion.
3.  Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant was not considered by the FY11 COL APL AR Non-AGR PSB because he had been selected for promotion by the FY10 COL APL AR Non-AGR PSB.  It is not clear why the applicant was not considered by the FY12 COL APL AR Non-AGR PSB.

4.  Serving in the grade of lieutenant colonel and having attained 28 years of commissioned service, the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 23 August 2014.

5.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was eligible for promotion consideration by SSB under the FY12 criteria due to omission by Department of the Army RC Selection Board.  However, prior to approval of the SSB report, the applicant was transferred to a retired status.

6.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing and as a matter of justice, it would be appropriate in this case to direct continuance of the special board for a former officer and correcting the applicant's records as recommended below, as is applicable.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by directing continuance of the special selection board for consideration of a former officer for promotion to colonel under the applicable fiscal year 2012 criteria.


   a.  If selected as a result of continuance of the special board and, subject to the promotion post-board screen process and with the understanding that, if selected, promotion is contingent upon Senate confirmation, further correct his records by voiding his removal from the Reserve Active Service List, showing he met all the eligibility criteria for promotion selection effective the approved date of the promotion selection board, promoting him in due course in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 to colonel with the appropriate date of rank, and paying to him any associated back pay and allowances.

   b.  If not selected for promotion, notify him accordingly and affirm no change in his U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired Reserve) status.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017077



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017077



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952

    Original file (20120020952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022351

    Original file (20120022351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was selected for promotion to LTC in June 2012 and he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 August 2012. Although the applicant was selected for promotion prior to his REFRAD from the AGR Program, the board was not approved until after his REFRAD, resulting in the applicant being a promotable LTC on the RASL. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2012 the applicant was notified by memorandum that the Secretary of the Army approved the SELCON Board recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019686

    Original file (20130019686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum from HRC, subject: Selective Continuation (SELCON) on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL), dated 30 January 2012, shows the applicant was notified that he was not selected by the Army Reserve Components Promotion Selection Board (PSB) for the second time. The advisory official stated that the USAR AGR Program does not reinstate officers; they must re-apply and meet the current needs of the AGR Program. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving as a MAJ in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011893

    Original file (20130011893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a separate 2-page addendum accompanying his Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) application, the applicant states the critical factors (individually and collectively) that prevented him from having a smooth transition, development, and progress in the USAR, and which prevented him from meeting the minimum MILED requirements for promotion to MAJ, including: a. his relatively recent transfer from the USNR to the USAR; b. the timing of his accession into the USAR from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013134

    Original file (20120013134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He is a Special Agent/GS-14 (now Senior Executive Service) with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and has been designated a Key Federal Employee since May 2010 * Despite being twice not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC), he was provided positive written notifications, on two occasions, that he was SELCON (continued service on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) in March 2011, approved by the Secretary of the Army (SA) * Regardless whether a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024016

    Original file (20100024016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. The removal of all Promotion Review Board (PRB) and Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings (ROP) and associated records/documentation from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) f. To the extent the ABCMR is unable to grant relief, forward his case to the Secretary of the Army (SA). The ABCMR consider only the evidence of record. The applicant provides the following documents: * Email exchange with the Director, ABCMR * Previous ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014753

    Original file (20130014753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was not selected for promotion to CPT with no reason given. She states that an error occurred in her board file whereby her BSN was not filed prior to the convene date of the promotion selection board. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers) states promotion consideration or reconsideration by an SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the record at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017269

    Original file (20130017269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Colonel (COL) Army Promotion List (APL) non-select letter from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), correction of the date of rank (DOR) and effective date of her promotion to the rank/grade of COL/O-6, correction of her mandatory retirement date (MRD) to 1 July 2017, and attendance at the Army War College in July 2014. g. The Army regulations provide that a special selection board (SSB) will not be convened to consider...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017511

    Original file (20130017511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she served on active duty as well as the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the USAR; she was denied promotion to LTC * her promotion packet was pulled due to the erroneous belief that she did not have enough retirement points/qualifying years for promotion * she was slotted in an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) slot and worked for Army Broadcasting from 1 July 1995 to 1 March 2003 * the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) erroneously listed her in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003964

    Original file (20150003964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided numerous letters of support from Soldiers (general officer ranks and below) attesting: * to his good character and duty performance * it is not consistent with the applicant's character or performance that he would have improperly reprised against MAJ Z____ * the applicant had grounds to negatively evaluate MAJ Z____ for failing to adhere to his stated intent * there was ongoing friction between the applicant and MAJ Z____ * DAIG Case DIH 11-XXXX should be reevaluated 8. Command...