Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017069
Original file (20140017069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017069 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests termination of his participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and refund of his SBP premiums.

2.  He states when he was medically discharged, he received a short briefing about SBP which he did not understand the annuity portion.  He adds he was never told about the cost and/or the payment period.  He was aware he was responsible for paying SBP premiums once he began receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs for his 100 percent disability rating.  He states he talked to a representative with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and was informed of the amount of money that he would have to pay for the SBP.  He argues that he would not have agreed to this plan had he been informed.

3.  He provides:

* Self-authored statement with his sworn statement
* Spouse sworn statement
* DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change), dated 23 September 2014
* DFAS Statement, dated 28 September 2014 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 1 August 2008, the applicant received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter).  The letter indicated that detailed information concerning Reserve Component (RC) SBP program and cost was enclosed.  It further stated that he had 90 days from the date of the letter to make a decision or he would be automatically enrolled in the RCSBP under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay.

2.  On 18 October 2008, he completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) electing "Option C (IMMEDIATE ANNUITY) at full retired pay."

3.  On 1 June 2012, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency notified the applicant that he was found to have a disability and he would be permanently retired with a disability rating of 90 percent.  In order for DFAS to activate his retired pay and establish his retired pay account, he was required to complete DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel). 

4.  On 6 July 2012, he was released from the Army National Guard because of physical disability and placed on the Retired List for permanent physical disability.

5.  On 24 July 2012, he completed DD Form 2656 and elected coverage for spouse only based on his full gross pay.

6.  A DFAS statement, dated 28 September 2014, show the applicant's monthly cost for SBP was $214.78 with a prior amount due of $1,971.10.  The total amount due by the date of the statement was listed as $2,195.48.

7.  On 23 October 2014, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate) requesting to "Suspend Coverage" and his spouse signed the form the same day.  The form is notarized.

8.  The applicant's spouse stated she and her spouse went to the Oklahoma Military Department to out-process on his departure from the military.  She said she did not hear about the spouses' SBP until receiving a letter stating that they were in debt for over $2,100.00.  She stated that options under SBP were never discussed because it they had been, she would have remembered.

9.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  This law also provides that every member having a spouse and/or child(ren), who retired/transfers to the retired list on or after that date, is automatically covered under SBP at the maximum rate unless he/she elected otherwise before retirement or transfer to the retired list.
10.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member’s retired pay.  Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP – it automatically rolls into SBP coverage.  If RCSBP Option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection had the member died prior to age 60.

11.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows on 1 October 2008, he received his 20-year letter.  The letter indicated that detailed information concerning the RCSBP and cost was enclosed.  On 18 October 2008, he completed DD Form 2656-5 electing immediate coverage at the full base amount.  

2.  The evidence further shows on 1 June 2012, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency notified him of his permanent retirement due to disability and his requirement to complete DD Form 2656 to activate his retired pay and establish his retired pay account.  He completed this form on 24 July 2012 and again elected coverage for spouse only at his full base amount.

3.  It is unfortunate that he and his spouse believe that they were not informed about SBP and/or the cost of the plan.  However, his 20 year letter indicated that information concerning the RCSBP and cost was enclosed.  Accordingly, there is no evidence to show a Government error or an injustice occurred.  As such, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show he declined to participate in SBP and his spouse concurred in a timely manner.

4.  As cited above, the applicant could have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which his retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  A notarized statement from his spouse is required.  

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017069





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017069



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017267

    Original file (20130017267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she and her spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Once she made the RCSBP election the premiums would have to be recovered from her retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010128

    Original file (20130010128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Letter from DFAS, dated 4 April 2013 * DD Form 2656-2, dated 5 March 2013 * Letter from DFAS, dated 10 May 2013 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Form) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is married will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C (spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006751

    Original file (20130006751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears he may have been automatically enrolled, as he has been paying premiums for his SBP coverage since he began receiving retired pay. Given the short period between his retirement date and the date he applied for termination of his SBP participation, it appears he never intended to enroll in the SBP and his spouse concurred with his decision. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010035

    Original file (20140010035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Previous application to this Board and a failure to exhaust letter * Letter dated 23 May 2014 from DFAS to her Member of Congress * DD Form 2656, dated 15 November 2012 * DD Form 2656-6, dated 7 January 2014 * Copy of her military identification card * Letter, dated 6 February 2014, to an RSO in Monterey, CA * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Letter from DFAS-Retired and Annuity Pay,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013131

    Original file (20140013131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 June 2003, the FSM was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, required that upon receipt of that letter, a qualified RC member, who was married, would automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C, spouse and child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless different coverage was selected within 90 days of receipt of that letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009410

    Original file (20140009410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She elected not to participate in the SBP. Three options are available: * Option A, elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * Option B, elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday * Option C, elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 8. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013829

    Original file (20140013829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When the applicant applied for retired pay at age 60, he again submitted an SBP election and alerted DFAS officials to the fact that his child was disabled and that, in effect, he still desired the election he made in the previously-submitted DD Form 1883. If the spouse were to die, then Gregory, the disabled child, would receive the SBP annuity. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016893

    Original file (20130016893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both believed that they made the correct election on the form not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premiums are being deducted from her Army retired pay. Section IX (SBP Election), item 26 (Beneficiary Category(ies)), the applicant failed to make an election in any of the categories (i.e., a through g), although she did indicate in block g (I Elect Not to Participate in SBP) with an "X" that, "I Do Have Eligible Dependents Under The Plan"; c. Section XI (Certification), item 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021525

    Original file (20100021525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021525 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His 20-year letter notified him, in pertinent part, that upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component (RC) married member would automatically be enrolled in the RC Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007403

    Original file (20100007403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * When he retired he was married to his former spouse and they divorced in January 2007 * When he remarried in September 2007, he sent documentation to decline SBP * He believes this information is on record because no premiums were taken out of his retired pay until January 2010 * He has noticed that he now owes $1,700.00 in debt for this clerical error * He submitted paperwork for the "secondary beneficiaries" prior to the birth of his fourth child and his name was...