Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016835
Original file (20140016835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:

		BOARD DATE:  5 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140016835


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her records to show her name change. 

2.  The applicant states she legally changed her first name from "L____" to "N___" on 16 May 1989.  She was misinformed at the time she made the name change about her ability to have her records corrected.  The failure to have her new first name on her records affects her benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) showing her request to change her last name due to marriage
* DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 18 July 1984, showing approval of the change in her last name 
* social security card and pages from her U. S. passport
* Name Change Order, Superior Court, State of Arizona, County of Pima, dated 16 May 1989

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 
justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 19 February 1981, shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) using the first name "L____." 

3.  She entered active duty for training (ADT) on 23 February 1981 and she was released from ADT on 24 October 1981.  Her DD Form 214 shows her first name as "L____."

4.  She was discharged from the USAR on 18 February 1987.

4.  The applicant provides a document showing she legally changed her first name to "N___" on 16 May 1989. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  This regulation has historically stated that item 1 will contain the name taken from the Soldier's personnel record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant enlisted and served on active duty using the first name of "L____."  

2.  She provides a court document showing she changed her first name to 
"N___" effective 16 May 1989, which is nearly 8 years after her release from ADT and more than 2 years after she was discharged from the USAR.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  While it might be understandable that the applicant now desires the record to show her current name, in the absence of a showing of material error or injustice there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.
4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the name in her military record and to satisfy her desire to have her legally changed first name shown in her OMPF.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
      		CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023544



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016835



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019895

    Original file (20140019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011959

    Original file (20060011959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She adds, in effect, that the reason that no beneficiary [type of coverage] is indicated on the form is because the FSM was married at the time and he was not aware that his children could receive SBP benefits in the event of his death before he began to receive retired pay at age 60. The FSM's military records show his date of birth (DOB) as 28 May 1959. This document shows, in pertinent part, that the FSM was notified that having completed the required years of service, he would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004755

    Original file (20120004755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * her service in Korea is not documented on her DD Form 214 * she served 14 months in Korea * she legally changed her name 3. Her DD Form 124 should be corrected to show this medal. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020527

    Original file (20110020527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was boarded on 20 February 2009 and his completed packet was submitted by her on 16 March 2009. On 19 March 2009, he submitted an application for appointment as a commissioned officer of the USAR. His appointed packet was boarded by the Office of the Chief, Army Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002861

    Original file (20080002861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows she was honorably released from ADSW for completion of a period of active duty on 22 February 1990, by reason of self-terminating Orders 023-105, dated 12 October 1989. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty in ADT and/or ADSW status on 1 October 1989.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020690

    Original file (20120020690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 22 October 1985 as follows: * item 1 (Name) – to show his name as "L____ M____ L____, Jr." * item 18 (Remarks) – to delete the statement "AMOUNT OF DISABILITY/READJUSTMENT PAY: $13,452.60" * item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – to show "PHYSICAL DISABILITY" vice "PHYSICAL DISABILITY WITH SEVERANCE PAY" 2. His DA Form 3340 (Request for RA Reenlistment or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009069

    Original file (20090009069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 11 July 1984, which will simply be referred to as her DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings, be corrected to show that she entered active duty on 7 October 1981 instead of 14 September 1982. The applicant's military records show that she enlisted in the USAR on 23 July 1981. As the applicant's ADT from 7 October 1981 to 10 March 1982 while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007979

    Original file (20120007979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) contains the DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) prepared during her enlistment processing. The evidence of record confirms she served on active duty and was separated under the first name that is listed on her DD Form 4, DD Form 214, and all other documents filed in her AMHRR during the period in question. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Entry-level status for such a member of an RC terminates as follows: (1) 180 days after beginning training if the member is ordered to active duty for training (ADT) for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the member is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013838 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 14 October 1988 and was relieved from IADT on 4 March 1989 after completing 4 months and 21 days of active service. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14...