Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016665
Original file (20140016665 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  30 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140016665 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his completion of the Signal Intelligence/Electronic Warfare Course of 4 weeks in 1993 and the Cryptologic Skills for Junior Officers Course of 16 weeks in 1993. 

2.  The applicant states he completed the two courses and they were not included on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and course completion certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was commissioned as a U.S. Army Reserve second lieutenant on 28 July 1987 and was ordered to active duty on 3 February 1988.  He completed his training as an air defense artillery officer and served in a variety of assignments.  He was assigned to Fort Meade, Maryland on 12 August 1993.

3.  He completed the Signal Intelligence/Electronic Warfare Course of 4 weeks in 1993 and the Cryptologic Skills for Junior Officers Course of 16 weeks in 1993.

4.  On 1 April 2000, while assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to completion of required service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he completed the military education courses of CAS3 – 1994, Military Intelligence (MI) Officer Tactical Intelligence Course – 1992, MI Officer Advanced Course – 1992, Chaparral/Vulcan Officer Qualification Course – 1988 and the Air Defense Officer Basic Course – 1988.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed the Signal Intelligence/Electronic Warfare Course in 1993 and the Cryptologic Skills for Junior Officers Course in 1993 and is entitled to have those courses added to his DD Form 214.

2.  Accordingly, it would appropriate to add those courses to his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the entries “Signal Intelligence/Electronic Warfare Course in 1993” and  “Cryptologic Skills for Junior Officers Course in 1993” to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016665





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016665



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016443

    Original file (20080016443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 2-1 (DD Form 214 Preparation Instructions) of the Separation Documents regulation, in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. a. The instructions for Item 14 (Military Education) states to list formal in-service training courses by title, length in weeks, and year successfully completed during the period of service covered. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct Item 14 of the applicant’s DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020438

    Original file (20120020438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of her 35P (Persian Farsi Cryptologic Linguist) MOS training she should have received a $10,000 incentive bonus. According to the memorandum, she was not serving in the bonus MOS of 35W (Electronic Warfare/Signal Intelligence Recruit) and did not become duty MOS qualified (DMOSQ) within a 24-month period. Although she enlisted for a bonus in MOS 35W, that MOS is only a placeholder MOS that converts to MOS 35N or 35P upon completion of all training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010578

    Original file (20080010578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 be corrected from 23 September 2005 to 26 August 2004 (the date she completed the Electronic Warfare/Signal Intelligence Course) or 7 September 2004 (the date she arrived at her first duty station). In a self-authored statement, dated 7 June 2008, the applicant states that: a. she enlisted under the ACASP program, formerly known as the stripes for skills program, which qualifies non-prior service-members with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011706

    Original file (20110011706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 July 1993 to show: * he participated in the Liberation and Defense of Kuwait campaigns * in item 11 (Primary Specialty) 11B2OC2 Infantry Anti-armor Specialist * in item 12f (Foreign Service) 4 years, 8 months, 12 days * in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) the: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012499

    Original file (20120012499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served with the 712th Military Intelligence Battalion, 701st Military Intelligence Brigade, from 19 February 1989-20 June 1991, a period in which his unit was awarded two awards of the ASUA. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to award him the ASI C8 or add this ASI to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the ASUA (2nd Award) to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010544

    Original file (20080010544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his unsigned self-authored statement, dated 5 June 2008, the applicant states that: a. he enlisted under the ACASP program, formerly known as the stripes for skills program, which qualifies non-prior service-members with critical Army needed skills to be granted an accelerated promotion, when they enlist for a certain MOS, meet all the requirements for that MOS, and can demonstrate proficiency to their training command. He was finally recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5 on 27 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008000

    Original file (20080008000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 17 April 2008. e. DA Form 300 (Language Proficiency Questionnaire), dated 8 August 2001, 2 April 2002, and 19 February 2008. f. Certificate of Training, dated 20 November 2001, completion of Electronic Warfare/Voice Interceptor Spanish Course. The applicant’s date of rank and effective date of promotion should coincide with the date he completed his proficiency training and the commander recommended the promotion. At the time the applicant enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006669

    Original file (20120006669.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending 22 February 2012 to show: a. award of the: * Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) * Combat Infantryman Badge * U.S. Army Excellence in Competition Badge, Bronze, Pistol b. completion of the: * Military Transition Team Training, 8 weeks in March 2008 * CREW Master Gunner Course, 2 weeks in August 2010 * Iraq Theater of Operations Counter Radio-Contra Improvised Explosive Device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013824

    Original file (20080013824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 4856, dated 27 November 2006, stated the applicant completed his obligations to be promoted to E-5 under the ACASP and completed his 8-week evaluation period as of 27 November 2006. The applicant provided a memorandum, dated 12 October 2007, from the Commander, 314th Military Intelligence Battalion. The battalion commander stated that this new policy equated to a target promotion date within 10-14 weeks after an ACASP enlistee arrived in the unit (based on 2 weeks of unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012789

    Original file (20090012789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    What can be established with certainty is that the applicant enlisted in the DEP for an MOS which provided for accelerated promotion to pay grade E-4, and enlisted in the RA for an MOS which provided for an accelerated promotion to pay grade E-5. The applicant's records do not contain a recommendation by his commander that he be given accelerated promotion to pay grade E-5. Notwithstanding the ODCS, G-1 advisory opinion and in view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence in which...