Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015936
Original file (20140015936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 May 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015936 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge. 

2.  The applicant does not believe there was an error or an injustice for his felony conviction in 1982.  He would just like to be considered for an upgrade of this bad conduct discharge.  He is trying to clear up some wreckage from the past, for employment purposes.  He had some shortcomings in his life, but he has since positively reinforced his life and he is a better person. 

3.  The applicant provides a letter of recommendation and multiple certificates. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 September 1979.  He was trained in and held military occupational specialty 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist). 

3.  His records also show he served in Hawaii from 4 January 1980 through 9 September 1981.  He was awarded the Army Service Ribbon and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). 

4.  On 10 September 1981, he pled guilty at and was convicted by a general court-martial of one specification of

* wrongfully possessing cocaine, on 1 May 1981
* wrongfully selling cocaine, on 1 May 1981
* wrongfully possessing marijuana, on 1 May 1981
* wrongfully selling marijuana, on 1 May 1981
* wrongfully possessing cocaine, on 14 May 1981
* wrongfully selling cocaine, on 14 May 1981
* wrongfully possessing LSD, on 1 June 1981

5.  The court sentenced him to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months, reduction to private/E-1, and a forfeiture of $400 pay for 
18 months.  

6.  On 15 October 1981, the convening authority approved the sentence, and except for that part of the bad conduct discharge, ordered the sentence executed.  The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for appellate review.

7.  On 18 February 1982, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and the sentence.

8.  There is no evidence he petitioned the U.S. Court of Military Appeals for a grant of review.

9.  Headquarters, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KS, General Court-Martial Order Number 695, dated 14 September 1982, shows that after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews, the convening authority ordered the bad conduct discharge executed. 

10.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 29 October 1982.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), as a result of court-martial.  This form further shows his character of service as bad conduct.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of creditable military service and he had lost time from 10 September 1981 to 29 October 1982.

11.  He submitted: 

	a.  A letter of recommendation, dated 28 August 2014, from an official at the Colorado Department of Corrections.  This official states the applicant has been a volunteer for the Alcoholics Anonymous program at the correctional facility since June 2008.  He is always prompt and courteous.

	b.  Multiple certificates showing completion of addiction counseling skills, preventing infectious disease in alcohol and drug treatment settings, client records management, ethical issues in the alcohol and drug treatment setting, and principles of addiction treatment. 

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the following characters of service: 

	a.  Paragraph 3-7a states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7b states that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

13.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows his trial by a general court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. 

2.  By law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited.  This Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.

3.  He was given a bad conduct discharge pursuant to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.  The appellate review was completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected.  The fact that he is now trying to clear up some shortcomings from the past does not negate the fact that he was convicted by court-martial of some serious offenses.  

4.  Based on his overall record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  This misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015936



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015936



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000891

    Original file (20110000891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 February 1982, a special court-martial convicted the applicant of wrongfully having in his possession 0.54 grams, more or less, of a habit-forming narcotic drug, heroin. Special Court-Martial Order Number 277, dated 6 November 1982, shows the sentence was affirmed. He was also convicted by a special court-martial of possessing heroin.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026310

    Original file (20100026310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026310 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was discharged in 1983 and he has lived with a BCD for 28 years. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019421

    Original file (20140019421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Court-Martial Order Number 28, dated 11 February 1983, issued by the U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, shows the applicant's conviction and sentence were affirmed and the convening authority ordered his bad conduct discharge executed. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. His conviction, confinement, and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011568

    Original file (20100011568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, he states in 1989 he was medically diagnosed and treated for schizophrenia and now he believes his bad behavior on active duty was the result of this undiagnosed illness. The applicant contends his bad conduct discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge based on the passage of time, his certification as a nurse assistant since his discharge, and his medical diagnosis of schizophrenia. __________X__ ____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025489

    Original file (20100025489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 16 December 1981 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, as a result of court-martial (other), with issuance of a bad conduct discharge. The applicant contends that his bad conduct discharge should be upgraded because he was a good Soldier before he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002006

    Original file (20120002006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002006 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to honorable. Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Benning, Special Court-Martial Order Number 111, dated 17 October 1983, shows the applicant's approved sentence to reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 3 months, and discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006091C070205

    Original file (20060006091C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ernestine Fields | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board’s 15-year statute of limitations. ___ Margaret Patterson_______ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20060006091 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON | | |DATE BOARDED |20061109 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(BCD) | |DATE OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012845

    Original file (20080012845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017434

    Original file (20100017434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 March 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review considered the record of trial in the applicant's case. At issue before the Court was whether the military judge erred by considering, during sentencing, portions of a record of trial from a prior general court-martial of the applicant. The applicant contends that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions because he was introduced to drugs and alcohol by Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014276

    Original file (20100014276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to a general discharge. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), as a result of court-martial. The evidence of record shows the applicant was 19 years of age at the time of his enlistment and nearly 21 years of age at the time he committed his offenses.