Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015778
Original file (20140015778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015778 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination. 

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of any MH condition during processing through the pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The evidence of the available records showed diagnoses of primary insomnia and maladaptive personality traits were the only MH diagnoses rendered during processing through the pilot DES.  Both were eliminated from the medical evaluation board (MEB) and, therefore, not adjudicated by the physical evaluation board (PEB).  However, those diagnoses were not identified in the focused criteria in the Mental Health Review Terms of Reference.  The SRP determined the applicant did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 

3.  The SRP acknowledged the applicant’s assertion that his records should be corrected to include a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis; however, there was no evidence to support a PTSD diagnosis.  At the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the applicant claimed a pre-existing condition of PTSD and that his experiences in the military served to aggravate that condition.  The VA psychiatrist noted that the diagnostic criteria for PTSD were not met, he had no symptoms of PTSD, and there were no recorded PTSD symptoms in any of the treatment records.  At the 2013 VA mental examination, the psychiatrist indicated the applicant did not meet the criteria for PTSD and, thus, PTSD was not diagnosed.  The applicant never deployed to the combat zone, and although he reported that pre-military exposure to trauma resulted in PTSD, he also noted he had not received any MH treatment, suggesting a self-diagnosis of PTSD.  The SRP concluded there was no evidence to support a PTSD diagnosis at any time prior to separation.

4.  The SRP undertook a careful review of the record in evidence and was unable to conclude that the full diagnostic criteria for primary insomnia were met.  There was no clear evidence that the insomnia was not secondary to other medical issues or was the direct physiological effects of medications used to treat other conditions or the use of substances (caffeine).  The SRP also considered whether any MH condition(s) were unfitting for continued military service, regardless of specific diagnosis. 

5.  The SRP noted the applicant had received no MH care, reported brief use
of sleep medication, mental status examinations (MSE) were unremarkable, and there were no reports of visits to the emergency room secondary to sleep-related accidents, or suicidal thoughts and mood or anxiety symptoms.  There was no indication in the record that the applicant’s report of excessive daytime sleepiness interfered with duty.  The SRP concluded that the evidence of the record reflected minimal MH-related symptoms leading to the time of separation.  The commander’s statement did not implicate an MH issue in regard to occupational functioning or mention issues related to insomnia.  No MH condition or the condition of insomnia was ever profiled.  

6.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting at the time of separation and none were subject to disability rating.

7.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  


      ____________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140015778



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011617

    Original file (20150011617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted the applicant was not assessed with a primary mental disorder, and although he was referred to behavioral health (BH) for “depression” there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014491

    Original file (20140014491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination. The recorded diagnosis of depression during the physical examination for the Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013518

    Original file (20140013518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of changes in a diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012225

    Original file (20150012225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014051

    Original file (20150014051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP noted there was no evidence in the records to support a PTSD diagnosis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000239

    Original file (20140000239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also agreed that the preponderance of evidence by multiple MH providers who provided continuity care to the applicant supported a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The SRP next considered whether the mental condition diagnosed by the VA and the MEB psychiatry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002063

    Original file (20150002063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant was evaluated by two other psychologists who did not diagnose PTSD. There were few symptoms recorded associated with PTSD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021506

    Original file (20140021506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of processing through the DES, the diagnosis of PTSD was not considered by the physical evaluation board (PEB); the SRP determined that the PTSD condition was eliminated to the applicant’s possible disadvantage during that process. The SRP noted the applicant’s recorded symptoms at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) examination in November 2010 were significantly more than the reported symptoms in the treatment records and at the medical evaluation board (MEB) psychiatric...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000661

    Original file (20140000661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP Panel deliberated on the IPEB descriptors and determined that all the MH conditions were listed, although not separately rated in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003752

    Original file (20150003752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The record in evidence recorded the absence of the MH evaluation and the absence of a MH diagnosis prior to the C&P evaluation.