Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015478
Original file (20140015478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015478 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his second award of the Purple Heart (Purple Heart 1OLC) and his award of the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device (BSM w/"V" Device).

2.  The applicant states that his awards of the Purple Heart 1OLC and BSM w/"V" Device are not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, a copy of a newspaper article indicating his second wound, his first Purple Heart certificate, and orders awarding him the BSM w/"V" Device.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted on 17 March 1964.  He completed his one-station unit training at Fort Polk, Louisiana and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia for assignment to Company B, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile).

3.  On 16 August 1965, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and on 25 October 1965, he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  He was wounded on 14 November 1965 (fragment wounds to the shoulder) and was awarded the Purple Heart on 17 November 1965.  He was again wounded on 16 November 1965; however, there is no evidence of his being awarded the Purple Heart 1OLC.  It is noted that the Vietnam Casualty Listing shows two entries indicating the applicant was a battle casualty.

4.  The applicant participated in two campaigns and departed Vietnam on 21 February 1966.  He was transferred to William Beaumont General Hospital in El Paso, Texas where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 14 April 1966.  He had served 2 years and 28 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Purple Heart, Vietnam Service Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge.

5.  A review of his records shows that the applicant had “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service, and his records are void of derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).  His records also contain General Orders Number 1289 issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division on 1 May 1966 awarding him the BSM w/"V" Device for heroism on 14 November 1965.  That order also notes that the applicant was wounded.

6.  The newspaper article provided by the applicant indicates that he was wounded a second time in the right arm and shows a picture of him in a hospital bed being awarded the Purple Heart.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Also eligible for this award are individuals who qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and served for less than six months of service but:

* were wounded as a result of hostile action 
* were captured by hostile forces but later escaped or were rescued or released
* were killed in action or otherwise in line of duty

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows that the applicant's unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although there are no orders present in the available records to show that the applicant was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart, the fact that the applicant has a photograph and newspaper article announcing his second award of the Purple Heart and the fact that his name is reflected twice on the Vietnam Casualty Listing, it is reasonable to presume that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart 1OLC and it should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant was also awarded the BSM w/"V" Device by general orders and is entitled to have that award added to his DD Form 214.

3.  Records show the applicant received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.  His records do not contain any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the AGCM (1st Award).  Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 17 March 1964 through 14 April 1966 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

4.  The applicant’s unit in Vietnam was cited for awards of the PUC and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

5.  The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  Accordingly, it should be added to his DD Form 214.

6.  Additionally, the applicant served in two campaigns and is entitled to wear two bronze service stars on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 17 March 1964 through 14 April 1966 
* deleting the awards of the Purple Heart and Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214
* adding to his DD Form 214 the AGCM (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Purple Heart 1OLC, BSM w/"V" Device, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), PUC and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation







2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. 
The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015478



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015478



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005723

    Original file (20110005723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that his awards of the BSM w/1OLC and the AGCM are also not entered on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served a total of 3 years, 1 month, and 11 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the BSM w/“V” Device, and the Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Gold Star. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012114

    Original file (20110012114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and that all of his authorized awards be added to his DD Form 214 ( Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served 4 years, 1 month, and 14 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007102

    Original file (20090007102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 15 September 1968. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004825C070205

    Original file (20060004825C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his three awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), two awards of the Purple Heart, and his award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). On 6 January 1966, he was transferred with his unit to Vietnam. A review of his records as well as the Vietnam Casualty Listing fails to show that the applicant was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart or that he was wounded a second time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020292

    Original file (20130020292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The entry in item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 that shows he was wounded in action on 15 May 1969 and the DA Form 8-275-3 that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart on 17 May 1969 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base adding award of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014505

    Original file (20130014505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Newspaper article * DD Form 214 * Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's SS order confirms he was a medic who refused evacuation at the time he was wounded in action in order to treat casualties. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088243C070403

    Original file (2003088243C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It states, in pertinent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010268

    Original file (20120010268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and one oak leaf cluster (1OLC). While the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, he was not awarded any service stars to denote his campaign participation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018910

    Original file (20140018910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record is void of orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the VSM with two bronze service stars; b. awarding him the AGCM (1st...