Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015046
Original file (20140015046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015046 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show active service credit for the 3 days he spent taking a physical exam in December 1952. 

2.  The applicant states:

* he spent three days in the Fort Hamilton Army Hospital for an extended physical exam under military control
* he was told that he was subject to all Army regulations while he was there
* this information was in his official military personnel file but was not transferred or shown on his DD form 214
* inflation, rising health costs, and diminished income and health has caused him to use all available veterans benefits
* the uncovered time in 1952 does not allow him to claim benefits as a Korean Era service veteran

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter from the National Personnel Records Center
* NA Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service)
* a letter from the Veterans Administration
* his selective service registration card
* SSS [Selective Service System] Form 102 (Classification Record) 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service member's records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, his DD Form 214 contains sufficient information to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 July 1955.  He served in military occupational specialty 711.10 (Clerk Typist).  

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on        29 May 1957 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 22 days of total active service.    

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty and is issued to Soldiers who serve in the Regular Army and Reserve Components for a period of 90 days or more of active duty service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be credited with three days of active service time for the time he spent undergoing a physical exam in 1952. 

2.  The evidence shows he was not inducted into the Army of the United States until 8 July 1955 and then served for more than 90 days of active service.  Upon his release from active duty in 1957, he was issued a DD Form 214.  His time spent meeting requirements in the Selective Service System prior to entering active duty is not recorded on his DD Form 214 as per regulatory guidance.
 
3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015046



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015046



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012260

    Original file (20110012260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction). Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) does not show service prior to 7 September 1955. Although his DD Form 24 shows he had 8 months and 5 days of creditable service for pay prior to his 7 September 1955 induction, it appears this service was performed as a member of the Army National Guard and not active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002394

    Original file (20120002394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002394 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 33 (Record of Assignments) the applicant: a. entered the basic combat training course at Fort Chafee, on 22 November 1955; b. entered advanced individual training at Fort Lewis, on 15 February 1956; c. was assigned to the 9th Infantry Regiment at Fort Lewis on 21 April 1956 with duty as an ammunition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009789

    Original file (20140009789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. However, his available DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), ending on 1 April 1955, and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 17 October 1957, contain sufficient information for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. His DD Form 214 lists in: * Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068215C070402

    Original file (2002068215C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed the Ordnance Corps Officer Candidate School (OCS) at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, and on 3 July 1943, was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army of the United States (AUS) Ordnance Corps and ordered to active duty at Headquarters, New York Port of Embarkation. On 14 April 1958, his file was reviewed at Headquarters, First United States Army (HQ, 1USA), for promotion to MAJ. His record shows : “Not Recommended” and “Not Fully Qualified” with the comment, “Has an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015241

    Original file (20080015241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant’s available military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 19 May 1950 and was discharged on 16 January 1958 under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The evidence of record shows that the applicant initially entered active duty on 19 May 1950, was honorably discharged for the purpose of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012916

    Original file (20110012916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 18 March 1954 through 6 September 1955. The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 7 September 1955 through 25 July 1957. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to the Remarks section of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 July 1963 the following entry: * Inducted on 18 March 1954 * Honorably discharged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009692

    Original file (20120009692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he had 7 months and 4 days foreign service and the last overseas theater he served in was U.S. Army Europe and he was awarded his second National Defense Service Medal. The foreign service shown on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 25 November 1966 is only for foreign service completed during the period of the DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate in this case to also add the additional medals it is known he would be authorized for his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001226

    Original file (20100001226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For service involving the foregoing period, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) was prepared correcting the DD Form 214 issued at the time of the next separation to show all military service not previously covered by the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 18 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 May 1955 the following entry: * Enlisted 7 February 1951 for three (3)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007385

    Original file (20090007385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was never given service credit for his USCG service from 1941 to 15 August 1945 or his USNR service from 21 October 1947 to 10 January 1949. The applicant’s records show he was honorably released from active duty on 31 July 1975 and was placed on the retired list in his retired grade of specialist six/E-6 on 1 August 1975. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the USNR from 21 October 1947 to 20 October 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011440C070208

    Original file (20040011440C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040011440 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on...