IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 21 April 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014594
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was wounded by friendly fire on 10 July 1969 at Landing Zone (LZ) Bayonet, near Chu Lai in the Republic of Vietnam. While in training, they came under mortar fire, which spooked the instructor who accidently discharged a claymore mine. The regulation that governs the Purple Heart changed to allow the award to Soldiers wounded by friendly fire.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, a Standard Form (SF) 502 (Clinical Record Narrative Summary), and a DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 February 1968. He completed his initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76A (Supply Clerk). Later, upon his promotion to specialist four/E-4, he was awarded MOS 76V (Equipment Storage Specialist).
3. Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 28 June 1969 through on or about 7 February 1970.
4. His records contain an SF 502, dated 10 July 1969, which shows he was treated for minor fragment wounds of his left arm and leg as a result of a combat center accident.
5. His record also contains a DA Form 8-275-3, dated 10 July 1969, which shows he was treated for fragment wounds of his left upper arm and left knee, the result of a claymore mine that exploded in class.
6. Neither item 40 (Wounds) nor item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 indicate he was either wounded in combat or awarded the Purple Heart.
7. He was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve on 8 February 1970. His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
8. His available record is void of orders that show he was previously awarded the Purple Heart and there are no documents indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority. Further, his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster. His medical records are not available for review.
9. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
10. His record contains a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri, dated 30 January 2002, which was sent to him in response to an inquiry he made regarding his entitlement to the Purple Heart. In this letter, an NPRC Archives Technician responded that they were unable to verify his entitlement to the Purple Heart; no records had been found to show he received medical treatment for wounds received in action. The NPRC acknowledged the presence of documents that showed he was injured when a mine exploded in a classroom; they informed him that the Purple Heart cannot be awarded for accidental injuries.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is authorized to members who are wounded in action. It defines a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or enemy agent sustained in action. It also stipulates that the wound for which a Purple Heart is being awarded must have required treatment by medical personnel and the records of such medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. It further states that injuries or wounds resulting from accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action, clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Purple Heart was carefully considered.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was injured when a claymore mine exploded during classroom instructions on 10 July 1969. By regulation, accidents, to include explosive and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action, except when in the heat of battle and not involving gross negligence, are examples of injuries or wounds for which award of the Purple Heart is clearly not justified.
3. He contends his training class came under mortar fire and as a result, his instructor was spooked and accidentally discharged the claymore mine. The evidence of record established the accidental discharge of the claymore mine in a classroom setting; however, it does not corroborate a mortar attack that preceded the accidental discharge.
4. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, regrettably, absent evidence that conclusively shows his wounds or injuries resulting from hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart or correcting his record to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090012380
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140014594
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012204
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request to correct his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides clear evidence from his medical records showing he was wounded by a claymore mine while serving in Vietnam. For the Purple Heart to be awarded, the preponderance of the evidence must clearly show not only a wound's existence and that it was treated and recorded by medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024885
He provided various records of medical care that show he sustained an injury during the discharge of a claymore mine by friendly forces and received medical treatment for this injury. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show he was wounded in action in Vietnam on or around 4 May 1970 which would entitle him to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009470
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In accordance with the criteria for award of the Purple Heart his accidental injury, while tragic, does not qualify for award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017278
There is no available evidence that indicates the FSM's death resulted from hostile actions perpetrated by an enemy of the United States. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to any member who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the armed services, has been wounded or killed or who has died or may hereafter die after being wounded: a. in any action against an enemy of the United States; b. in any action with an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007419
The applicant states that he suffered injuries in the Republic of Vietnam but was never given the Purple Heart. The available evidence shows the applicant suffered an injury to his hand as a result of an accidental claymore mine detonation on 16 December 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of documentation that conclusively show his claymore mine accident was a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011065
The applicant requests his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's service record reveals the following: a. there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart; b. his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains no entry in item 40 (Wounds) and no Purple Heart entry in item 41 (Awards and Decorations); and c. his DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized award. The applicant is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster, there are no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011990
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in item 40 (Wounds). _______ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007061
Paragraph 2-8h contains a list of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter of official record. ____________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024388
He provided Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) proceedings, dated 30 April 1970, which state: * he was injured when blasting caps he was carrying in his right hand were detonated by sparks from an exploding trip flare while he was setting up for a night ambush * he suffered a traumatic amputation of his right forearm, below elbow * the entry "AI" 13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017773
Personnel wounded as a result of non-hostile action who are not placed on hospital's very seriously injured lists are not reported as casualties in accordance with current regulations. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. There is no available evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence...