IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 April 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014454
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) with Company C, 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry, 198th Light Infantry Brigade (LIB), Americal Division.
a. He states that his mortar platoon was sent into the jungle for a few days. The unit received sniper fire and encountered booby traps.
b. On the morning of 13 March 1968, he was detailed to bury trash from the night before. As he was preparing to dig a hole, another Soldier (Private First Class (PFC) F____ R. M____, Jr.) chided him about his stature and volunteered to dig the hole. When PFC M____ stuck his shovel into the ground, the ground exploded and PFC M____ fell to the ground. Sergeant First Class (SFC) R____ L____ was standing off to the applicant's side and he sustained fatal injuries to his stomach.
c. He states that it felt like someone hit him on the right side of his head with a baseball bat. He could not hear out of his right ear. He also noticed that he had been hit with shrapnel in his left arm, shoulder, and on the side of his head.
d. Over the years, he has been trying to obtain copies of his records, but he was told they were either lost or burned by the fire in 1973.
e. He states that the Vietnam Veterans Memorial ("The Wall") shows the two Soldiers' deaths are categorized as non-hostile. He adds that the platoon may not have been under fire at the time, but he was later told that the cause of the incident was a booby trap. He does not understand why the Soldiers who were killed and injured in the incident were not awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides copies of a self-authored statement (summarized above), his request for transfer, pages 3 and 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim, and two extracts from "The Wall."
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the U.S. Army on 28 September 1966. He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).
3. His DA Form 20 shows in
* item 31 (Foreign Service) service in Vietnam from 4 October 1967 through 20 September 1968
* item 38 (Record of Assignments)
* Company C, 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry, 198th LIB, from 4 October 1967 through 24 April 1968
* Company B, 23rd Supply and Transportation Battalion, Americal Division, from 25 April through 9 July 1968
* Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 11th LIB, from 10 July through 16 September 1968
* item 40 (Wounds) is blank (no entries)
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart
4. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 20 September 1968. He had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 23 days of total active duty service this period that included 11 months and 17 days of foreign service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not list the Purple Heart.
5. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart.
6. A review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty roster failed to reveal the applicant's name.
7. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between
1965 and 1973 maintained by the Awards and Decorations Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
8. In support of his application the applicant provides the following documents.
a. A copy of a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), subject: Request for Transfer, dated 12 April 1968, that shows the applicant requested transfer to a non-combat unit due to an injury incurred on 13 March 1968 because he was medically unqualified to perform in his MOS. On 21 April 1968, his request was approved for reassignment to Company B, 23rd Supply and Transportation Battalion for duty in MOS 64A1O as a Light Truck Driver.
b. VA Form 21-22 (Appointment of Veterans Service Organization as Claimant's Representative), dated 21 July 2014, that shows the applicant appointed J____ M____, National Service Officer, The Military Order of the Purple Heart, to act as his representative in his VA claim.
c. Two extracts from the Vietnam Veterans Memorial website
(www.thewall-usa.com) that show
* SFC R____ L____, 198th LIB, died of non-hostile injuries (accident), on 13 March 1968 at Quang Tin, South Vietnam
* PFC F____ R. M____, Jr., 198th LIB, died of non-hostile illness/injury (accident), on 23 March 1968 at Quang Tin, South Vietnam
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations. It shows the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.
a. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.
b. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
c. It also provides examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart and lists, in pertinent part, accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered.
a. The applicant does not provide and the record does not contain any contemporaneous medical records that show he was treated for injuries or wounds that were the result of hostile action in the RVN.
b. The applicant provides evidence pertaining to two Soldiers whom he relates were serving with him at the time of the incident in question. The evidence of record shows the two Soldiers died as a result of non-hostile injuries, on 13 March and 23 March 1968, at Quang Tin, South Vietnam.
c. It is acknowledged that the 23 March 1968 date may be in error or reflect that one of the Soldiers died 10 days after he was injured (on 13 March 1968). In any event, the evidence of record clearly shows the Soldiers died as a result of an accident (i.e., non-hostile injuries).
2. The applicant's military service records do not show any evidence that he was wounded or injured in action as a result of a hostile act of the enemy.
a. The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.
b. There are no orders or any other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart.
c. Thus, the evidence of record does not support the applicant's claim.
3. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140014454
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140014454
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019545
f. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Valorous Unit Award, and Army Good Conduct Medal. His service record does not include orders for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, or Army Good Conduct Medal. His award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device clearly shows he was engaged in active ground combat with the enemy while assigned to his infantry unit in the RVN.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003307
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003307 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130016895, dated 10 June 2014. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020541
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available service medical records show he listed a shrapnel wound in December 1969 and the military medical doctor found evidence of a scar on his right forearm. In the absence of orders or other additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023026
c. A statement from a former unit member who states the company was ambushed on 17 July 1967 by small arms fire and mortar rounds and that they took some casualties at the time. d. A statement from a friend who served in Vietnam at the time and who also supports awarding the applicant the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity and/or those of the authors, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102653C070208
The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated that the basic criteria for award of the Purple Heart required that it be awarded to soldiers for wounds or injuries received as a direct result of enemy action. While the statement described what happened on 21 February 1969, the major general does not state that he was present when the aircraft crashed or that he witnessed the aircraft being hit by enemy fire causing it to crash. Notwithstanding the evidence submitted by the applicant, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021321
The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show awards of the: * Purple Heart * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * any and all awards as a result of his service in Vietnam 2. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows the FSM sustained wounds or injuries as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001258
A DD Form 173 (Joint Message Form), dated 20 June 1968 from the Chief, Casualty Division, Washington DC to the commanding general of U.S. Army Vietnam provided additional guidance in the determination of hostile action casualties in addition to that provided in Army Regulation 600-10. a. Paragraph 3 stated, "The rule that has been applied in helicopter or aircraft accidents is that the cause of the accident must be directly attributable to action by the enemy rather than merely the presence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004441
That is why he was removed from jump status due to medical reasons and transferred to a non-airborne unit for the remainder of his time. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010867
The DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 17 November 1967, shows that the casualty status was "Non Battle" and that the FSM died on 8 November 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam as a result of injuries sustained while a pilot of military aircraft which crashed into the water. Because there was no definitive determination that the crash was caused by hostile action, and not the result of mechanical failure or other accident, regrettably there is insufficient evidence on which to base award...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018909
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded...