Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013934
Original file (20140013934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013934 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his retirement orders, dated 18 June 2008, to show:

	a.  his disability was based on injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war incurred in the LOD during a period of war as defined by law and

	b.  his disability resulted from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

	a.  His retirement orders state his disability was not based on an injury or disease received in the LOD as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the LOD during a war period as defined by law.  This should be "Yes."

	b.  His retirement orders state his disability did not result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.  This should be "Yes."

 3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 7 August 1974.

3.  His medical evaluation board is not available for review.

4.  On 19 January 2007, a physical evaluation board (PEB) found him physically unfit due to:

* vascular dementia with depressed mood status post-cerebrovascular accident in March 2004
* coronary artery disease

5.  The PEB recommended his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).

6.  Item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding That) of his DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), dated 19 January 2007, states: 

* his retirement is not based on disability from injury or disease received in the LOD as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the LOD during a period of war as defined by law
* the disability did not result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104

7.  On 23 January 2007, he concurred with the PEB findings and waived his right to a formal hearing.

8.  On 18 February 2007, he was discharged from the ARNG in the rank of sergeant first class and placed on the TDRL.

9.  On 2 June 2008, a PEB found him physically unfit due to vascular dementia following a cerebrovascular accident.  The PEB recommended a 50-percent disability rating and permanent retirement.  He concurred with the PEB findings on 5 May 2008.

10.  On 17 June 2008, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) approved the formal PEB's findings.

11.  USAPDA Orders D170-05, dated 18 June 2008, show he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 50-percent disability rating.  These orders state:

	a.  "Disability is based on injury or disease received in LOD as a direct Result of Armed Conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in LOD during a war period as defined by law:  Not Applicable."

	b.  "Disability resulted from a combat related injury as defined in 26 USC 104 [Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104]:  Not Applicable."

12.  Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104, states the term "combat-related injury" means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service under conditions simulating war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The PEB determined the applicant's disability was not based on injury or disease received in the LOD as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the LOD during a period of war as defined by law and his disability did not result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.  He concurred with the PEB findings and recommendation on 23 January 2007.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence showing his disability was incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service under conditions simulating war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence with which to amend his retirement orders.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013934



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013934



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001661

    Original file (20130001661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the proper code to show he was retired due to permanent disability based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and resulted from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. In block 10c of the DA Form 199, the board will record its...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009392

    Original file (20140009392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 25 October 2005, to show his disease and disability were a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the LOD during a period of war as defined by law. His asthma condition and back injury were incurred in the LOD while deployed to Iraq during the period 30 May 2003 to 15 July 2003. b. He provided a DA Form 2173, dated 8 July 2004, which states he injured his back when he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019835

    Original file (20090019835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * his discharge orders and DA Form 199 should be corrected to show his injury was caused by an instrumentality of war * his medical records clearly show his condition was caused from noise exposure from his occupation in the military * he worked on tanks and these vehicles are instruments of war 3. The applicant contends his military records clearly show his condition was caused by noise exposure from his occupation in the military (tank mechanic). The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028715

    Original file (20100028715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 13 December 2004 DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) as follows: * Add Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5241 for cervical fusion * Add VASRD code 5003 for degenerative arthritis * Show a 60% combined total disability rating * Payment of back pay and allowances from 5 February 2005 (date placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)) to the present 2. On 22 October 2004, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019501

    Original file (20110019501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He disagrees with the CRSC determination that his disability is not combat-related * The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings that placed him on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and his final PEB show he was granted permanent disability retirement * His PEB clearly states in item 10d that his disability was incurred in a combat zone (Iraq) or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations (Iraq) * Department of Veterans Affairs...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004657

    Original file (20130004657.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: * all updates directed as a result of an approved recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) * all awards he is authorized * the appropriate entries on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to indicate he was retired due to a combat-related disability incurred in the line of duty (LOD) 2. As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the DA Form 199 to reflect the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001611

    Original file (20130001611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 September 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001611 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of: * item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was permanently retired effective 13 January 2010 * Orders D012-74, dated 13 January 2010, to show his disability was based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) during a war period as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018082

    Original file (20140018082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his retirement orders to show his disability did (instead of did not) result from a combat-related injury. The applicant states: * His Line of Duty (LOD) established that his injuries occurred during deployment to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) from 2005 to 2006 * They occurred in a combat situation and should be considered combat-related and in direct result of armed conflict/war * His retirement orders state that his injuries were not combat-related; he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020226.

    Original file (20130020226..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His medical evaluation board (MEB) paperwork included LOD determinations for the specified injuries and all injuries incurred while in Iraq in 2003. The applicant requests correction of his retirement orders to show his disability resulted from combat injuries incurred in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015698

    Original file (20140015698 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 November 2012, a medical evaluation board (MEB) was conducted at Fort Lee, VA which diagnosed the applicant as having a medically unfitting condition of degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbar spine, and recommended that he be referred to a PEB. The applicant was evaluated under the Integrated Disability Evaluation System and on 13 November 2013, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted the applicant a combined disability rating of 30% for DDD, L5-S1 with central disc...