Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013794
Original file (20140013794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	   10 September 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013794 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change in the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the temporary disability retirement determination

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The evidence of the available records shows diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and cognitive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) were the only diagnoses rendered during processing of the disability evaluation.  The SRP determined that the MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant’s disadvantage and, therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP agreed that PEB adjudication of unfitting PTSD and cognitive disorder NOS diagnoses were supported by the evidence.  The applicant appeared to have fully met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD; therefore, the diagnosis of PTSD was the appropriate diagnosis and application of the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 was correct (mental disorders due to traumatic stress) at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry.  

4.  The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at time of the applicant's placement on the TDRL.  The higher 70 percent rating was for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood due to such symptoms.” 

5.  The SRP reviewed the psychiatric narrative summary (NARSUM) and the Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination recorded an essentially normal mental status examination (MSE) and noted the applicant's symptom improvement with medication.  There was no evidence of impairment in thinking, judgment, or mood symptoms with suicidal ideation.  There were no recorded visits to the emergency department and no hospitalizations for MH issues.  There were no legal issues, no incidents of domestic violence recorded, and no evidence of impaired impulse control.  The SRP determined that there was insufficient reasonable doubt (in accordance with VASRD Section 4.3) for recommending a 70 percent TDRL entry rating and that the record in evidence best supported the 50 percent rating for TDRL entry. 

6.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the applicant’s MH conditions at TDRL entry.

7.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      ____________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140013794



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005736

    Original file (20150005736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The evidence of the available records showed the diagnoses of mood disorder secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI), cognitive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and depression, atypical psychosis and chronic PTSD were rendered during processing through the DES. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence and mindful of VASRD section...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006052

    Original file (20150006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015783

    Original file (20140015783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The depression was not listed on the medical evaluation board (MEB) or adjudicated by the physical evaluation board (PEB). Clinical documentation described depressed mood and symptoms commonly associated with depression; however, there was insufficient evidence that the symptoms met the diagnostic criteria for an Axis I diagnosis of depression.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005870

    Original file (20150005870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP agreed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015794

    Original file (20140015794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in or elimination of diagnoses of the MH condition to the possible disadvantage of the applicant during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). Both the MEB and the VA examiners specifically noted that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD were not met. The SRP next considered if the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137

    Original file (20140009137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommends no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicant’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018934

    Original file (20140018934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a change of the diagnosis to PTSD at TDRL entry.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015809

    Original file (20140015809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP acknowledged the Compensation and Pension (C&P) examiner’s assessment and diagnosis of PTSD; however, there was insufficient clinical evidence to support that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria were met since there was no clear evidence in...