Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013695
Original file (20140013695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013695 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests inclusion of a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code on his 27 March 1992 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he is attempting to reenlist and his DD Form 214 does not include an RE code.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 6 February 1990 and entered active duty for training (ADT) on 22 August 1990.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 98C (Signals Intelligence Analyst).

3.  The applicant was released from ADT and transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 138th Military Intelligence Battalion, Rosemont, IL on 27 March 1992.

4.  The 27 March 1992 DD Form 214 shows he was released from ADT by reason of self-terminating orders for the completion of ADT.  Block 27 (Reentry Code) states "NA."  He had a Reserve Obligation Termination Date of 5 February 1998. 

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 5 February 1998.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states that the entry at block 27 is not applicable to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated for other than cause.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was not separated for cause but to return to the control of his USAR unit.  Since he was still serving in an active USAR status, the assignment of "NA" in lieu of an RE code was appropriate.

2.  The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice warranting relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013695



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013695



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012934

    Original file (20090012934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect a Separation Code in block 26 and a Reentry (RE) Code in block 27. The applicant’s DD Form 214 issued at the time of his relief from active duty training (ADT) based on his self-terminating orders reflects the entries “NA” in blocks 26 and 27 under Separation Code and Reentry Code. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007531

    Original file (20100007531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 16 March 1989 for a period of 8 years. Upon completion of her training, the applicant was released from active duty for training (ADT) on 22 February 1990 to her Minnesota ARNG (MNARNG) unit to complete her military service obligation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008499

    Original file (20140008499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a change to item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a RE Code instead of "NA." The applicant was a member of the USAR who was released from ADT by reason of completion of required active service. He was not released from active duty for cause; therefore, an RE code was not applicable to him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016873

    Original file (20110016873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his: * Characterization of service from uncharacterized to honorable * Narrative reason for separation from entry level status to completion of required service * Reentry eligibility (RE) Code from N/A (Not Applicable) to RE-3 2. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007398

    Original file (20080007398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, and two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, and that the medals be issued to him. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request: a. DD Forms 214, dated 7 July 1988 and 2 November 1990. b. Therefore, he served a qualifying period of service for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018904

    Original file (20120018904.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a DD Form 214 that shows he: * was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm on 17 November 1990 * served in Southwest Asia from 27 December 1990 to 7 May 1991 * held military occupational specialty 88M and he was assigned to the 656th Transportation Company in Southwest Asia * was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal * was separated on 29 May 1991 after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006044

    Original file (20120006044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006044 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request. The evidence of record shows that RE codes are not applicable to Reserve Component Soldiers being separated from active duty, except those separated for cause.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...