Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013598
Original file (20140013598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  17 March 2015  	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013598 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was medically retired vice discharged due to physical disqualification for duty in his military occupational specialty (MOS).   

2.  The applicant states:

a.  He was separated for physical disqualification for duty in his MOS, but he 
was informed he was being medically retired.  He was separated and returned to his home of record to await the paperwork to be medically retired that he believed he would receive.  

	b.  He received information from the Veterans Administration (VA) that he had been given a 10-percent disability rating.   

   c.  He enrolled in college and attempted for years to get his DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) corrected without any success.  Every person that he spoke to said it was someone else's responsibility and no one ever looked into the situation.  His DD Form 214 states he was separated for physical disqualification, and he was informed at the time he was being medically retired.  

   d.  He was separated from active duty still wearing a full metal leg brace.  His 
right knee has never been able to fully extend, causing a permanent limp.  He had reconstructive surgery on his knee performed again after the initial surgery failed.  Then he had another surgery by a civilian orthopedic surgeon due to the fact the VA would not assist him and it was at a great personal financial cost.  He states he was injured on active duty, in the field, and endured numerous surgeries at Fort Benning, GA, which left him permanently disabled with more surgeries in his future.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* a self-authored letter
* a letter from the VA, dated 30 May 2013
* his DD Form 214    

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 12 September 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded MOS 13B (Cannon Crewmember).  

3.  His service medical records are not available for review.  However, his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) reveals in September 1981 the applicant received reconstruction surgery on his right knee.  On 14 January 1982, he acknowledged that he could not perform the duties of his MOS due to his physical profile. 

4.  The applicant had only two available options: 1) to retrain into an acceptable new MOS or 2) be separated from military service.  He requested to be reclassified and retrained into MOS's 68B, 68D or 68G (Medical Field).  However, on 15 February 1982 and again on 10 March 1982 his first sergeant notified him that he had failed to choose an acceptable MOS or take other action as necessary.   

5.  On 2 April 1982, the applicant acknowledged and consented to a voluntary discharge, and that he did not intend to extend or reenlist.  Therefore, the Headquarters, United States Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Benning, GA, initiated action to release the applicant from active duty for transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve to complete his military service obligation, if any, or to discharge him due to being physically disqualified from his MOS without retraining.  

6.  On 7 April 1982, he was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-18 due to physical disqualification for duty in MOS.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-18 states that individuals who, within their last 6 months of service, are given physical profiles which will preclude them from further duty in their primary, secondary, or additional MOS without retraining and who do not intend to reenlist, will be separated when all the following criteria apply:

	a.  The individual has 6 months or less service remaining until discharge or release from active duty and signs a statement that he is willing to accept separation under this paragraph.

	b.  The individual has been determined by appropriate medical authority to have assignment limitations due to physical impairment that will preclude utilization in his primary, secondary, or additional MOS for a period of more than 60 days.

	c.  The individual cannot be reclassified into another MOS without retraining.  Excluded from this category are individuals who can be retrained within a period of 30 days either by on-the-job training or formal training conducted at the installation to which they are currently assigned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was medically retired vice discharged for physical disqualification for duty in his MOS.

2.  All documentation in the applicant's record shows that although he was disqualified for his current MOS due to his injury, he had the opportunity to retrain into another MOS.  However, he made a voluntarily election to be separated from service with no intention of extending or reenlisting.  Furthermore, there is no indication that his injury resulted in a medical condition that warranted a referral to the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System.  The fact that he had multiple surgeries pre - and post service is not evidence of error in his discharge processing or in his narrative reason for separation. 

3.  The VA awards compensation based on statutory and regulatory authority separate from that of the Army.  The VA prepares an independent decision on veterans post service medical issues that are service connected.  In addition, any medical condition that worsens over time, although it might generate a higher VA disability rating, does not automatically deem a service member to be medically retired.

4.  Further, a 30 percent or higher disability rating assigned by a PEB at the time of separation processing is required to be medically retired.  However, the applicant was not entitled to a PEB since his medical condition did not preclude him from continued military service. 

5.  The evidence of record fully supports the type of separation the applicant received.  There is no evidentiary basis upon which to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004356



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013598



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021424

    Original file (20100021424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained medical conditions related to her knees and hand that rendered her physically unfit. There is no evidence the applicant was unfit because of low back pain at the time she was placed on the TDRL. There is no evidence the applicant had an unfitting medical condition related to back pain when she was placed on the TDRL or when she was removed from the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058998C070421

    Original file (2001058998C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 March 1984, an informal PEB found the applicant to be unfit for duty due to anterolateral rotatory instability and medial instability of the right knee with pain and swelling on exertion, rated as moderate, under the VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5257. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608851C070209

    Original file (9608851C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While his knee surgery was noted during that examination, he was determined medically qualified at that time. Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board for a determination of whether they are able to perform the duties of their grade and military specialty with the medically disqualifying condition. If the PEB determines that an individual is physically unfit, it recommends the percentage of disability to be awarded which, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013463

    Original file (20140013463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that in spite of requesting to retire due to completing a sufficient period of service for retirement, she was medically retired from the military with over 20 years of active federal service and was ineligible to reenlist due to having an RE Code of 4R. A Physical Disability Information Report, dated 10 June 2014, and U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Sill, OK, Orders 162-1314, dated 11 June 2014 (as amended by Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006526C070205

    Original file (20060006526C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions under consideration were: (a) Left Knee Condition, Degenerative Joint Disease; and (b) Chronic Pain. Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, states, in pertinent part, that reserve enlisted soldiers who are no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness under the standards of AR 40-501, chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation Including Retirement), will be discharged unless they are granted a waiver of the medical disqualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509653C070209

    Original file (9509653C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his retirement for years of service be corrected to a medical retirement. During that rating period he had been performing duties in his primary MOS of chemical specialist. A 10 percent disability does not warrant a medical retirement from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506854C070209

    Original file (9506854C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the ARNG with no prior service on 14 January 1974, entered on his initial active duty for training on 4 June 1974, was awarded the military occupational specialty of supply specialist, and was honorably released from active duty and returned to his ARNG unit on 5 December 1974. The PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged with severance pay, rated 10 percent disabled, contingent on the applicant’s unfitting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086903C070212

    Original file (2003086903C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 August 1996, the applicant's request to be retained on active duty, until 29 December 1996 or completion of physical disability processing, whichever came first, was approved. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Considering there is no evidence to show he was unfit to perform his military duties, the Board presumes he was retained in order to under go his knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01312

    Original file (PD2012-01312.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20080818 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201312 BOARD DATE: 20130214 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (42A10/Human Resources Specialist), medically separated for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with back pain status post (s/p) L5-S1 decompression L2-L5,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01789

    Original file (PD2012 01789.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic bilateral knee pain secondary to bilateral patella-femoral arthrosis, s/p bilateral lateral retinacular release”as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The sixremaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. Pre-SepLeftRightLeftRightFlexion (140 Normal)140135> 105>105Extension (0 Normal)00CommentStable kneeStable kneePainful motion noted at MEB§4.71a Rating10%10%10%10%*The MEB ROM numbers are from the...