Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013468
Original file (20140013468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	 14 October 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013468 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of Orders 303-353, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army 90th Regional Support Command (RSC) on 30 October 1998, to show he was transferred to another troop program unit (TPU) of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  In the alternative, he requests removal of the orders from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  In July 1998, he requested a TPU transfer to the Youngstown, OH area, due to his pending relocation to Ohio that resulted from a civilian employment promotion.  

	b.  He was told to find a unit when he arrived in Ohio; however, he did not find a unit until he was contacted by the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and sent to a unit in Pennsylvania.  

	c.  Orders 303-353 were supposed to transfer him to another TPU, not transfer him to the IRR for unsatisfactory participation.  Having this order in his records is stopping him from joining the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program.  

	d.  He contacted the 263rd Quartermaster Company; however, no one could or would assist him.  Every leader or administrative person said there was nothing he or she could do.  He has been in the USAR since 1992 and he would like to continue his service in the AGR program when accepted.

3.  The applicant provides Orders 303-353, issued by Headquarters, 90th RSC on 30 October 1998.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 26 June 1992, he enlisted in the USAR.  Currently, he is serving in the rank/grade of staff sergeant/E-6.

3.  His records show that in connection with his initial enlistment, he signed a    DA Form 3540 (Certificate and Acknowledgment of Service Requirements for Individuals Enlisting, Reenlisting, or Transferring, into TPUs of the USAR), wherein he acknowledge by his signature that he understood the requirement for satisfactory participation in a TPU.  

	a.  He acknowledged that if he changed his residence to a location too distant to permit continued participation with his unit, he would be authorized a period of not more than 90 days of excused absence from training.  During that 90-day period he must locate and join another Reserve Component unit.  

	b.  He would be responsible for keeping his commander advised of his current mailing address at which he could receive official correspondence.  He would be responsible for replying to and complying with all official orders and correspondence which he might receive.  

	c.  If he failed to participate satisfactorily for any of the reasons explained to him or which could be placed into effect thereafter by proper authority, he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and could be subject to removal action from the unit and transfer to the IRR.

4.  He was reassigned from a TPU in Kansas to a TPU in New Jersey in May 1995, and he was reassigned from a TPU in New Jersey to a TPU in Texas in July 1997.  

5.  His Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, maintained within the Integrated Web Services database at U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), show he was not credited with any service participation between July 1998 and May 1999.

6.  Orders 303-353, issued by Headquarters, 90th RSC on 30 October 1998, show he was reassigned to the IRR by reason of unsatisfactory participation, effective 30 October 1998.

7.  He was reassigned from the IRR to a TPU in West Virginia between November 1998 and March 2000; however, his records are void of these reassignment orders.

8.  Orders 080-01, issued by Headquarters, 464th Chemical Brigade, Johnstown, PA on 20 March 2000, reassigned him from a TPU in West Virginia to a TPU in Beaver Falls, PA, effective the same date.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the Army Military Human Resource Records Management Program.  It states that once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from the OMPF unless directed by competent authority. 

10.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve – Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) prescribes policies, responsibilities, and procedures to assign, attach, detail, remove, or transfer USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 4 states:

* a Soldier may be voluntarily reassigned to the IRR when he or she has a change of address to an area beyond reasonable commuting distance of a USAR training center
* a Soldier may be involuntarily reassigned to the IRR for unsatisfactory participation






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for amendment of Orders 303-353, or removal of those orders from his OMPF, was carefully considered; however, the available evidence does not support his request.  

2.  Evidence shows he did not perform any kind of duty during the period July 1998 through May 1999, a period of nearly one year.  There is no evidence in his record and he provides no evidence that shows he requested transfer to a TPU in his new work location during the period of June-October 1998, prior to his reassignment to the IRR for unsatisfactory participation. 

3.  Though it is not known when he was reassigned from the IRR to a TPU, the evidence does not indicate he followed the prescribed procedures to locate and request assignment to a unit at his new location in Ohio within 90 days or a similar amount of time in the fall of 1998.  Further, he stated that he had transferred on previous occasions, which is supported by his record.  As such, it appears he was already familiar with the process to locate and get reassigned to a new TPU upon relocation. 

4.  The ABCMR does not grant requests for changes to Army records solely for the purpose of potentially improving an applicant's career opportunities.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits.  

5.  There is no documentary evidence of error or injustice in the issuance of Orders 303-353 that reassigned him to the IRR.  They are properly filed in his OMPF.  The applicable regulation states documents will not be removed from the OMPF unless directed by authorized agencies.  Therefore, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013468



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013468



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068538C070402

    Original file (2002068538C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the USAR on 3 June 1980. There is no record of transfer, drill or assignment of the applicant to a unit in San Antonio, Texas. The applicant has failed to provide this Board with evidence to show that he obtained a unit of assignment in writing during his absence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011170

    Original file (20080011170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he was not excused from the unit drills and lost his SLRP and MGIB benefits for unsatisfactory participation. In this statement, the Army Reserve Recruiter states that during the time frame the applicant was receiving "U's" for not attending his unit drills, he had personally called the applicant's unit (399th Military Intelligence Battalion) to inform the unit administrator that the college course the applicant was enrolled in required him to attend class on Saturdays. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007478

    Original file (20060007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that following her relocation to Georgia in 2001 she attempted to get a different TPU (Troop Program Unit) assignment but was unable to do so. All of the correspondence and orders issued during this period list her rank as a SGT and was sent to addresses in Mississippi. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 4-15 (Involuntary reassignment for unsatisfactory participation) states that a TPU Soldier who has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005634

    Original file (20130005634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that prior to his deployment to Iraq he relocated to New York. The applicant has not provided evidence that shows he requested transfer to the IRR due to his relocation to Georgia. There is no evidence of error in his record of unexcused absences.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003002

    Original file (20150003002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 7249-R (Annex A, Certificate and Acknowledgement of Service Requirements of Fulfillment for Individuals Enlisting or Transferring into Troop Program Units (TPU) of the Army National Guard/USAR upon REFRAD/Discharge from Active Army Service) shows the applicant: a. Initialed the block indicating "Transfer to a Troop Program Unit of the U.S. Army Reserve." Instead, they put him out as an unsatisfactory participant. The evidence shows reassignment orders for unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016707

    Original file (20130016707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant request, in effect, retention of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); correction to his leave; and correction to his insurance coverage. The applicant's SLRP records indicate he enlisted in the USAR 17 April 1999 and was authorized to receive $10,000 toward the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking Order Number 02-074-012, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016182C070206

    Original file (20050016182C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant continued to serve in the USAR until he was released from his TPU effective 1 August 1996, at the age of 49 years, 5 months, and 18 days, and was transferred to the Retired Reserve, due to completion of maximum authorized years of service, in the rank of SFC. For USAR, the Soldier must have at least 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60, is a SFC/PLT (platoon sergeant) or below, and has completed 21 years of total military service. Therefore, his request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017151

    Original file (20140017151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Requests for promotion orders for ADOS Soldiers recommended for promotion by a TPU promotion selection board must be submitted to the appropriate RSC." The selection board convened on or about 7 August 2012 and considered Soldiers for promotion as shown below: * non-mobilized IRR, IMA, and Standby Reserve (Active List) Soldiers * mobilized IRR, IMA, and Standby Reserve (Active List) Soldiers to the ranks of SFC through SGM * ADOS Soldiers to the ranks of SSG through SGM that entered ADOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004721C070206

    Original file (20050004721C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he is currently employed as a civilian with the status of military technician (MT) [no longer employed as an MT effective 15 April 2006] for which he needs to maintain a Selective Reserve (SELRES) status or be retired involuntarily or medically. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 27 July 2001, the date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Chapter 7 of the regulation applies to the removal of Soldiers from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005901

    Original file (20120005901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Since a vacant position was not available he had to choose between: (1) ending his mobilization and transferring to the IRR where he would be a fully inactive Soldier without a position, thereby revoking his promotion; or (2) transferring as directed to the IRR and continuing his ADOS tour with no negative consequences to his promotion as advised by USAR G-1. Headquarters, 81st RSC, Orders 12-006-00030, dated 6 January 2012, show his promotion to SGM was revoked. As a result, the Board...