Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013452
Original file (20140013452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    10 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013452 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and      30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in
diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System.  The evidence of the available records show a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxiety disorder rendered and the SRP agreed the appropriate diagnosis and there was no change; therefore, the applicant’s case did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 

3.  The SPR determined that regardless of final physical evaluation board (PEB) diagnosis, the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 did not specify a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rather it stated “mental disorder due to a highly stressful
event” and its application was not restricted to PTSD.  After review of the evidence, the SRP concluded there was not sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that a highly stressful event severe enough to bring about the veteran’s release from active military service occurred and that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was not appropriate in this case.  

4.  The SRP later reviewed the record for evidence that at TDRL entry rating greater than 30 percent was supported.  At TDRL entry, the applicant did not manifest abnormalities in speech, judgment, and memory required for the 50 percent rating.  He described his marriage as “warm, close and supportive” and he was enrolled in college level courses.  His mood was depressed and his affect constricted, however, there was no documentation of panic attacks or suicidal ideation.  He had stopped participating in some of his hobbies due to the MH symptoms but he did socialize somewhat with friends from his unit.  Although there was evidence of post-separation worsening, the VA also rated the applicant’s MH condition at 30 percent just over 12 months after separation. 



5.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP agreed, that mindful of VASRD Section 4.3 (reasonable doubt), there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the MDD with anxiety disorder condition at TDRL entry

6.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      ___________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140013452



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007640

    Original file (20140007640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination, if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130. The PEB adjudicated the applicant for the diagnosis of MDD with associated anxiety requiring medication at the Temporary Disability retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006934

    Original file (20140006934.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP further considered whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affair Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable to any unfitting MH condition (physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudicated or SRP recommended), and made rating recommendations in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130 (and VASRD Section 4.129 as appropriate). The Service evidence made clear that a diagnosis of PTSD was considered, and the medical evaluation board (MEB) psychiatrist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002392

    Original file (20140002392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the mental health (MH) diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination and, if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012799

    Original file (20150012799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). Because the Service conducted an independent management review with special attention to PTSD and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150015662

    Original file (20150015662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP considered whether the provisions of VASRD section 4.129 were applicable for the unfitting MH condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001387

    Original file (20140001387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP first deliberated if a 70 percent rating was supported by the evidence at permanent retirement. The SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the applicant's PEB's permanent rating determination for MDD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015794

    Original file (20140015794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in or elimination of diagnoses of the MH condition to the possible disadvantage of the applicant during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). Both the MEB and the VA examiners specifically noted that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD were not met. The SRP next considered if the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009095

    Original file (20140009095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There was no evidence in the record of recurrent suicidal behaviors, no recorded visits to the emergency room for MH treatment, no recurrent psychiatric hospitalizations and no impairment in thinking or judgment at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the application of VASRD Section 4.129 was applicable in this case with a 50 percent disability rating. UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007871

    Original file (20150007871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the record in evidence did not support a rating higher than 30 percent for TDRL placement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021916

    Original file (20130021916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant's unfitting mental health (MH) condition diagnosis be changed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), coded 9411. The SRP determined that the...