Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013439
Original file (20140013439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 September 2014  	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013439 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and retirement determinations.  

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in
diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The evidence of the available records shows the diagnosis of cognitive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS), secondary to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), was rendered during processing through the DES; however, this did not constitute an MH diagnosis but rather a neurologic (brain trauma) diagnosis.  The evidence of the available records recorded no MH diagnosis was rendered and, therefore, there were no inappropriate changes to an MH diagnosis during the DES process.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Term s of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP agreed that the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting cognitive disorder NOS secondary to TBI was supported by the evidence, and the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were appropriately not applied at TDRL entry.  The PEB applied the VASRD rating criteria in effect at the time of TDRL entry. 

4.  The VASRD rating of TBI, 8045, at the time of TDRL entry allowed for the rating of subjective TBI complaints under 8045-9304, a maximum rating of 10 percent not to be combined with other TBI ratings.  The SRP considered if there was evidence for an unfitting MH diagnosis for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 10 percent at time of placement on the TDRL.  Although the VA upon reevaluation awarded a 70 percent rating for cognitive disorder NOS as an MH diagnosis, throughout the service treatment record the cognitive disorder NOS diagnosis was rendered secondary to TBI.  The neuropsychological evaluations were inconclusive as a result of "questionable effort throughout testing" and there was no evidence of an MH diagnosis which independently met Diagnostic Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders criteria or rose to the level of unfitting for a separate VASRD rating under VASRD Section 4.130.

5.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence,  and in the absence of an MH diagnosis not related to TBI, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the applicant's cognitive disorder NOS at TDRL entry.  Regarding the rating at the time of permanent retirement, the cognitive disorder, NOS was subsumed under VASRD code 8045; facets of cognitive impairment and other residuals of TBI not otherwise classified in effect at the time of permanent separation and was therefore, outside of the SRP scope of review.

6.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      __________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140013439



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005736

    Original file (20150005736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The evidence of the available records showed the diagnoses of mood disorder secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI), cognitive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and depression, atypical psychosis and chronic PTSD were rendered during processing through the DES. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence and mindful of VASRD section...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008198

    Original file (20140008198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. Its first assessment with regard to the MH condition, under SRP guidelines, was to judge (based on a preponderance of evidence) whether an MH diagnosis was changed or unfairly eliminated during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) proceedings. Furthermore, the conclusion that there was a separately unfitting TBI at permanent retirement was challenged by the observations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000257

    Original file (20140000257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by a vote of 2 to 1 that the applicant's unfitting condition diagnosis should be changed to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and that his permanent retirement should be modified to reflect a permanent 30-percent rating for his PTSD with a combined rating of 80 percent. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137

    Original file (20140009137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommends no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicant’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007635

    Original file (20140007635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP agreed that the PEB's coding approach (with the recommended application of VASRD, section 4.129, was appropriate to the applicant's TDRL entry and found no rationale for recommending separately ratable conditions at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015402

    Original file (20140015402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The disability attendant to TBI (excluding non-MH symptoms) will be subsumed in the SRP’s MH rating recommendation (as they were in the VA and PEB coding and rating determinations). The SRP noted that the preponderance of the applicant's record did not show evidence or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015783

    Original file (20140015783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The depression was not listed on the medical evaluation board (MEB) or adjudicated by the physical evaluation board (PEB). Clinical documentation described depressed mood and symptoms commonly associated with depression; however, there was insufficient evidence that the symptoms met the diagnostic criteria for an Axis I diagnosis of depression.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006052

    Original file (20150006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009138

    Original file (20140009138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP found no comprehensive post-separation evidence in the records provided proximal to the date of the applicant's separation for a more detailed rating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018934

    Original file (20140018934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a change of the diagnosis to PTSD at TDRL entry.