IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 March 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140013300
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry in item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "UNCHARACTERIZED" to "HONORABLE."
2. The applicant states she did not receive a court-martial during her enlistment. She was separated due to her health.
3. The applicant provides her DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 29 November 1990, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA).
3. A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings), dated 13 February 1991, shows that during basic training she complained of severe migraines that had existed since she was in high school. This form also shows that:
a. She was found not to meet medical fitness standards for enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), paragraph 2-29b. Her condition was found to have existed prior to service and not to have been aggravated by service. She was found not to meet retention standards under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-11.
b. On 14 February 1991, the applicant concurred with the proceedings and requested discharge from the U.S. Army without delay.
c. On 4 March 1991, the discharge authority approved her discharge from the Army.
4. On 7 March 1991, she was discharged after completing 3 months and 9 days of net active service this period. Her DD Form 214 shows in:
* item 24 "UNCHARACTERIZED"
* item 25 (Separation Authority) Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph
5-11
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) "DID NOT MEET PROCUREMENT MED FITNESS STANDARD NO DISABILITY"
5. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge stated a Soldier being separated under paragraph 5-11 was to be awarded a character of service of honorable, under honorable conditions or uncharacterized if in an entry-level status.
b. For RA Soldiers, the regulation defined entry-level status as the first
180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence shows the applicant was in an entry-level status when she was discharged by reason of not meeting procurement medical fitness standards. Because she was in an entry-level status, the governing regulation required that her service be uncharacterized. There is no evidence of an error in item 24 of her DD Form 214. Therefore, there is no basis upon which to grant the requested relief.
2. An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldiers military service. It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140013300
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140013300
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006838
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was honorably separated from the Army with a medical discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012128
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her uncharacterized entry-level separation to show she was medically discharged with an honorable characterization of service. A medical proceeding conducted by an EPSBD, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001579
This item also shows the applicant was separated on 1 July 1991 with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Thus, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was in an entry level status and her character of service is correctly recorded as uncharacterized on her DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012578
The applicant requests her 1990 uncharacterized discharge be changed to an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. The regulation stated in: a. Paragraph 5-11 - Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty for training for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029704
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on AD which would have permanently or temporarily disqualified him or her for entry into the military service or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014295
The applicant requests an upgrade of her uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge and correction of the narrative reason for her separation from "entry level status performance and conduct" to "medical." The DD Form 214 she was issued confirms she was discharged from active duty by reason of entry level status performance and conduct in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an uncharacterized character of service. The service of Soldiers discharged from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019104
The applicant requests, in effect, that item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to honorable. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013161
On 6 December 1996, the medical approving authority approved the findings of the EPSBD and recommended that the she be separated from the service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). b. paragraph 3-7b, a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. d. paragraph 5-11 that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017465
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. a. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000245
Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that for the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldiers status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214 for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army. The evidence of...