Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013053
Original file (20140013053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  12 March 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013053 

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that she served in support of Operation Desert Storm.

2.  She states she has orders to support her claim and that she was with the first unit to go in support of Operation Desert Storm.  She also states she needs her veterans’ benefits.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* General Discharge Certificate
* Request for Waiver of Separation
* Separation orders
* DD Form 214, dated 23 April 1981   

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 28 November 1980, the applicant enlisted in the U.S Army Reserve (USAR).  After completing initial entry training, she was awarded military occupational specialty 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist).

3.  On 23 April 1981, she was honorably released from active duty for training, received a DD Form 214 for the period of 12 January 1981 to 23 April 1981, and was assigned to a USAR unit.  

4.  A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Section VII (Record of Assignments) shows the applicant was ordered to active military service with the 78th Training Division, Lodi, NJ, from 25 January 1991 until 31 March 1991 when she was released from active duty.

5.  The applicant's name is not listed in the Desert Shield/Storm Database compiled by the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC).  The primary Desert Shield/Storm file contains one record for each active duty member who participated in-theater between 2 August 1990 and 31 July 1991.  

6.  The applicant's record is void of documentation showing she served in the geographical area of operations for Operation Desert Storm.  

7.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 24 August 1992, that corrected a DD Form 214 issued on 31 March 1991.  This DD Form 214 is not available for the Board's review.

8.  On 16 September 1998, the applicant was separated with a general discharge.
9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It was not until 15 September 2000, that Army Regulation 635-5 provided instructions for inclusion of operational support for members of the Reserve component.  Specifically, it stated that in the Remarks section of the DD Form 214 the following statement will be added for a Reserve Soldier ordered to active duty and deployed to a foreign country: "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF (OPERATION NAME) PER 10 USC (applicable section)."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was ordered to active duty on 
25 January 1991, and assigned to the 78th Training Division in Lodi, NJ, until she was released from active duty on 31 March 1991.  

2.  The applicant states that she has orders to show that she served in Operation Desert Storm; however, she does not provide them, nor is there any record in the DMDC database.  Furthermore, although her DD Form 215 shows she was on active duty orders during the Desert Storm time period (her DD Form 214, which the DD Form 215 corrected, is absent from her record), there is no documentation that she served in the geographical area of operations or in support of Operation Desert Storm.  Therefore, there is no basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

3.  The applicant is advised that if she has a copy of orders or official documentation confirming that she was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm, she may submit a request for reconsideration.  If she chooses to do so, she should ensure that she provides a complete copy of the orders and a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period in 1991.  Requests for reconsideration must be received by the Board within 1 year from the board date. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021499



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013053



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013984

    Original file (20110013984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the Southwest Asia Service Medal be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 2 September 1992. She was assigned to the U.S. Military Community Activity, Fulda, Germany, from 5 September 1985 until 27 August 1988. Item 5 (Oversea Service) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she served in Germany from 5 September 1985 to 27 August 1988.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071163C070402

    Original file (2002071163C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her DD Form 214 does not show her dates of service in Southwest Asia from 11 January 1991 through 20 February 1991. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) to Army members who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007693

    Original file (20080007693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of her request to correct her separation document (DD Form 214) to show that her pay grade was E-4 upon her release from active duty and to reflect that she participated in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The DD Form 215 dated 18 March 1997 shows that the applicant's record was corrected to show specialist four, E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019195

    Original file (20090019195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, the decision does not show she served in-theater during Operation Desert Storm. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000382

    Original file (20150000382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she is authorized the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). There is no evidence in her available military record that shows she was awarded the SWASM or evidence indicating she served in SWA. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base amending her DD Form 214 to show the SWASM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006290

    Original file (20110006290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. Therefore, this military document alone is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct her DD Form 214 to show these awards. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021387

    Original file (20140021387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his participation in Operation Desert Storm. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007195C070205

    Original file (20060007195C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 215, dated 23 March 1992, amended the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 March 1992, to show he entered active duty on 9 December 1991 and was released from active duty on 22 March 1992. However, except for the DD Forms 214, this Board does not have a record of what other active duty service the applicant may have. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004164

    Original file (20140004164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the awards he is entitled to for his service in Southwest Asia. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military decorations. Evidence of record shows he served in Southwest Asia and he participated in one designated campaign in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020731

    Original file (20140020731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards. Although DMDC records do not show the applicant participated in Desert Shield/Storm, her DA Form 2-1 shows she served in Saudi Arabia from 17 February 1991 to 11 April 1991. Based on her service in Saudi Arabia in support of Operation Desert Storm, she is also entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show her period of deployment.