Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012614
Original file (20140012614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  31 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140012614 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was entitled to full separation pay.

2.  The applicant states he served to his expiration of term of service (ETS) and only received half involuntary separation pay.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)
* DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 May 2014
* a memorandum, dated 22 September 2011, from the Secretary of the Army (SA), subject: Army Directive 2011-18 (Use of a Different Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code for Certain Separations to Allow for Half 
(5 percent) Separation Pay)
* a Memorandum for Record (MFR), dated 13 May 2014, from Headquarters, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA
* an MFR, dated 8 July 2014, from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 5 September 2000, he enlisted in the Regular Army and served on active duty until 23 May 2014.  He was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 on 
1 November 2008.  
2.  The following entries are shown on his ERB, dated 26 May 2014, in the blocks indicated:

* Expiration term of service (ETS) - 23 May 2014
* Reenlistment Eligibility/Prohibition - 9Z (weight, does not meet acceptable weight standards)
* Flag Code - KA (entry into the weight control program) (initial report)
* Flag Start Date - 6 June 2013

3.  A DA Form 4187, dated 13 May 2014, is his agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve of a Reserve component of the Army Forces for a period of not less than 3 years following his separation from active duty.

4.  A memorandum, dated 13 May 2014, from Headquarters, I Corps, Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA, states it was determined by the Reserve Component Career Counselor that the applicant was not qualified for enlistment or appointment in the Ready Reserves.

5.  On 23 May 2014, he was discharged.  He completed 13 years, 8 months, and 19 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.  His DD Form 214 contains the following entries:

* Item 18 (Remarks) - includes the entry “MEMBER IS ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY”
* Item 26 (Separation Code) - "JGH"
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) - "NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY"

6.  An SA memorandum, dated 22 September 2011, shows the SPD codes and narrative reasons for separation were changed for certain separations to allow for half (5 percent) separation pay.  

	a.  Soldiers who are separated at ETS and denied retention for further service, other than those at their retention control point, will be issued the following entries on their DD Forms 214:

		(1)  SPD code "JGH" (Involuntary discharge) or "LGH" (involuntary REFRAD (release from active duty) or transfer).

		(2)  Narrative reason - "Non-Retention on Active Duty."


	b.  This directive aligns Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) with Defense Department Instruction (DODI) 1332.29 (Eligibility of Regular and Reserve Personnel for Separation Pay), which authorizes the Army to compensate eligible Soldiers at their ETS with half separation pay.  Soldiers separated at their retention point will continue to receive full separation pay.

7.  SA memorandum, dated 28 January 2014, subject: Army Directive 2014-03 (Retention Control Points (RCP)) implemented RCPs effective 1 February 2014. The RCP for SGT is shown as 14 years.

8.  DODI 1332.29 states payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to members of the Regular and Reserve components involuntarily separated from active duty:

	a.  If they are on active duty or full-time National Guard duty and have completed at least 6 years, but fewer than 20 years of active service.

	b.  Their separation is characterized as honorable.

	c.  They entered into a written agreement with the Military Service concerned to serve in the Ready Reserve of a Reserve component of the Army Forces for a period of not less than 3 years following the separation from active duty.  A member who enters into this written agreement and who is not qualified for appointment or enlistment in the Ready Reserve need not be enlisted or appointed by the Military Service concerned to be considered to have met this condition of eligibility for separation pay.

	d.  Full payment of non-disability separation is authorized if they were fully qualified for retention, but were denied reenlistment or continuation by the Military Service concerned.  This includes a service member who is eligible for promotion as established by the Secretary of the Military Department concerned, but is denied reenlistment or continuation on active duty by the Military Service concerned under established promotion or high year of tenure policies.

	e.  Half payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized if they were denied reenlistment or continuation by the Military Service concerned.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have received full payment of non-disability separation pay at his ETS.
   
   
2.  In order to be eligible for full payment he would have had to be discharged at his RCP.  The RCP for SGT is 14 years.  He would have reached his RCP in September 2014.  However, he was discharged on 23 May 2014, 4 months before reaching his RCP.

3.  His ERB indicates he was not eligible for reenlistment due to his not meeting acceptable weight standards.  He was flagged for entry in the weight control program.  It is reasonable to conclude he was not permitted to extend his enlistment to his RCP based on the flag for weight control.

4.  In view of the above, he was denied continuation and discharged at ETS due to reasons other than reaching his RCP.  Therefore, his SPD code and narrative reason on his DD Form 214 are correct, and he was not eligible to receive full non-disability separation pay.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012614



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012614



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021749

    Original file (20130021749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 2013 shows he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4. Effective 20 June 1991, half payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to service members of the RA and RC, in pertinent part, who involuntarily have separated from active duty and have met each of the following four conditions: * the member is on active duty and has completed at least 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024385

    Original file (20110024385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 3 June 2009, does not show him flagged at the time. It states that the SPD code KBK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers voluntarily separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be changed to show an SPD of KBK and an RE-1 based on his argument that he had completed his NJP and he was no longer flagged at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003967C070205

    Original file (20060003967C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). The SPD Code of "JBK" is used when the authority for involuntary discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, due to "Completion of Required Active Service" for Regular Army soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment, who are separated upon completion of enlistment. Therefore, absent evidence to show that he was denied reenlistment or continuation on active duty, there appears to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013077

    Original file (20140013077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001011

    Original file (20140001011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation date as 4 October 2013 and his reentry eligibility (RE) code as 1. The applicant provides: * self-authored statement, dated 6 January 2014 * DD Form 214 for the period 24 March 1997-23 March 2001 (U.S. Marine Corps) * DD Form 214 for the period 30 August 2001-29 August 2004 (U.S. Army) * DD Form 214 for the period 12 June 2006-21 February 2007 (U.S. Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001011

    Original file (20140001011 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation date as 4 October 2013 and his reentry eligibility (RE) code as 1. The applicant provides: * self-authored statement, dated 6 January 2014 * DD Form 214 for the period 24 March 1997-23 March 2001 (U.S. Marine Corps) * DD Form 214 for the period 30 August 2001-29 August 2004 (U.S. Army) * DD Form 214 for the period 12 June 2006-21 February 2007 (U.S. Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020097

    Original file (20140020097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was assigned separation code "JFK" and reentry eligibility (RE) code 3 and he was authorized half separation pay in the amount of $8,870.04 * he was never paid the $8,870.04 in separation pay * he was told he had to enlist in the Army National Guard (ARNG) in order to receive the separation pay * his RE code does not permit him to enlist in the ARNG * his RE code did not stipulate that he needed to enlist in the ARNG in order to receive the separation pay listed on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009584

    Original file (20120009584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following changes to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) to show Fort Wainwright, Alaska (AK) * Item 18 (Remarks) to show his deployment with the 172nd Engineer Battalion * Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) to show another RE Code 2. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004665

    Original file (20130004665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This SPD code is to be used for RA Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise-denied reenlistment that are separated on completion of enlistment. Table 3-1 shows the RE codes and states in part: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant voluntarily chose to separate from the Army upon completion of his required active service as shown on his DD Form 2648,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019150

    Original file (20090019150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 11 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019150 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was authorized separation pay upon her discharge in January 1990.