IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 6 March 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140012383
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer educational benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
2. The applicant states:
a. he was unaware of the new guidelines for transferring his GI Bill benefits to his daughter at the time of retirement; and
b. he was on active duty status but on terminal leave from 1 August through 30 November 2009 and not in the loop during the TEB implementation period.
3. The applicant provides no additional documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. Having had prior active duty and Reserve Component service, the applicant enlisted in the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) on 10 January 2000. He was ordered to active duty on 1 October 2005 as a member of the Army National Guard of the United States in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
3. On 16 July 2009, he requested retirement from the INARNG. His official military personnel file contains an email from an INARNG official that states the applicant would begin terminal leave on 1 August 2009 and would be released from active duty on 12 September 2009.
4. On 14 September 2009, he was released from active duty and returned to the INARNG.
5. On 30 November 2009, he was discharged from the INARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve in his retired rank/grade of SFC/E-7. He was credited with 21 years, 9 months, and 12 days of total service for retired pay.
6. Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for the TEB provision of the Post-9-11 GI Bill on 22 November 2009. On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.
7. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Army G-1, Enlisted Professional Development Branch, Washington, D.C. has previously stated that although significant measures were taken to disseminate information concerning the transferability of unused Post-9/11/ GI Bill benefits, many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer the benefits prior to leaving military service.
8. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. A service member may execute transfer of benefits only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces. The Department of Veterans Affairs is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.
9. The program guidance stipulates that if a service member becomes retirement eligible during the period beginning 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 and agrees to serve an additional specified period, he/she is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her dependents. A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or
20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732. No additional service was required by service members who had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement, but he did not do so. The program was implemented in August 2009 and he retired on 30 November 2009 after completing just over 27 years qualifying years of service. Although significant measures were taken to disseminate information on the transferability of unused Post-9/11/ GI Bill benefits, many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirements.
2. Further, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit. This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the DOD website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 60 to 90 days of the program's implementation. Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.
3. He began his transition leave on 1 August 2009 and retired on 30 November 2009. It is reasonable to presume that had he been aware of the procedure to transfer his benefits while in an active duty status he would have done so. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ____x___ ___x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible dependent(s) prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140012383
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140012383
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003676
The applicant requests transfer of his education benefits to his son under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The program was implemented in August 2009 and he retired on 30 November 2009 after completing just over 20 years of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002033
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 September 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130002033 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120006833, on 9 October 2012. The evidence indicates he served for a qualifying period, was eligible to complete, and could have completed the TEB action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007459
The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer his benefits to either his spouse or his children if he had completed the request before leaving service. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the 9/11 GI...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012518
The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. b. the applicant is eligible to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his dependents because he left the service within 90 days of the implementation of the program. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to his transfer to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009998
He was not informed of the requirement to transfer educational benefits to his eligible dependents while he was still in an active duty status. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer his benefits to either his spouse or his children if he had completed the request before leaving service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012551
The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. b. the applicant is eligible to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his dependents because he left the service within 90 days of the implementation of the program. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement but did not do...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007441
A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant had more than 21 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he had completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023142
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 MGIB. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009634
The applicant states: * he was never informed of Post-9/11 GI Bill or the requirement to be on active duty to transfer this benefit * he believes he should have been informed of his eligibility during his outprocessing briefing * he was not required to serve any additional service and had met the requirements; he retired on 30 November 2009 3. The advisory official recommended approval and stated the applicant gained eligibility for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit before he left the service;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022903
The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his record should be corrected to show he applied to transfer his education benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to all his eligible family members prior to his retirement on 20 October 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...