Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012075
Original file (20140012075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	 24 February 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140012075 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. 

2.  The applicant states the loss of his mother in an auto accident at age 11 
caused his nervous condition.  He conveyed his medical condition to his senior officers and they ignored him.  He really tried to get help in the service but they wouldn't help him.  He still has this medical condition and will always have to have treatment for it.  He talked to his captain and motor sergeant about having a hard time handling the service and that he wanted out.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a date of separation of 23 November 1979
* an undated newspaper article
* his mother's obituary

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 11 April 1977, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic).

3.  On 12 October 1977, he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery at Fort Hood, TX.  On 12 May 1978, he was assigned to the 5th Battalion, 
7th Cavalry at Fort Hood.

4.  On 5 July 1978, he departed absent without leave (AWOL) and he was dropped from the rolls on 3 August 1978.  On 25 September 1979, he was apprehended by military authorities.

5.  There was no charge sheet in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ)  and his separation processing package was not available for review.

6.  On 23 November 1979, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of 
chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) for the good of the service.  He completed 1 year, 4 months, and 19 days of active service that was characterized as under other than honorable conditions.  He had 447 days of time lost.

7.  The undated newspaper article reports that his mother was killed in a car accident.  His mother's obituary indicated she died on 24 November 1971.

8.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within the ADRB's 15-year statute of limitations.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 10 stated that a member who had committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after the charges have been preferred.  The request must include the Soldier's acknowledgement that the Soldier understood the elements of the offense(s) charged and that the Soldier was guilty of the charge(s) or of a lesser included offense therein contained which also authorized the imposition of a punitive discharge.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally considered appropriate.

	b.  An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization was appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally had met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would have been clearly inappropriate.

	c.  A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

10.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his nervous condition started after losing his mother in an automobile accident when he was 11 years old.  The newspaper clippings he submitted are sufficient to show this incident did occur on 24 November 1971, over 6 years before he enlisted in the Army.  However, there is no evidence that he suffered from a nervous condition prior to or during his enlistment.  There is no evidence that he was unable to perform his military duties due to a nervous condition.  Therefore, this cannot be considered a mitigating factor in determining the characterization of his service.

2.  Although his separation package was not available for review by this Board, in order to be discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, charges would have been preferred against him for an offense for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge.  He would have been required to consult with defense counsel and to have voluntarily and in writing request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant would have admitted he was guilty of the offenses he was charged with and acknowledged that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulations were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process and the type of discharge and the reason for separation were appropriate.

4.  The fact that he was apprehended by military authorities after 447 days of being AWOL raises doubt as to his intent to return to military jurisdiction of his own volition.  Therefore, his service is considered unsatisfactory and there is no basis upon which to upgrade his under other than honorable conditions discharge to either an honorable or a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  __X______  ___X_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012075



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012075



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000310

    Original file (20080000310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000310 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant provided a copy of his mother’s newspaper obituary. However, the evidence provided by the applicant indicates that his mother died on 1 August 1991.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022325

    Original file (20120022325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to general under honorable conditions. The separation authority approved the request and directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008950

    Original file (20100008950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a medical discharge. That is why he wants a medical discharge. Orders 190-456, Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division, Fort Ord, CA, reassigned him to the U.S. Army Separation Transfer Point effective 30 September 1981. c. A properly-constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 30 September 1981 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008765

    Original file (AR20140008765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. A review of the applicant's request for discharge and his counsel's portion of the document fails to show any evidence he was informed that after a two-year period his discharge would be "automatically" upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded because: * he was 16 years of age when his parents consented to his entry into the USAR * the Army recruiter may have improperly waived certain restrictions to allow him to enter the RA * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021404

    Original file (20090021404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 November 1978, he was seen regarding pain to his left shoulder and left leg resulting from the accident the day prior. The evidence shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence showing the injuries he sustained in the bus accident contributed to his misconduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071340C070402

    Original file (2002071340C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: On 17 January 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge UOTHC. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsCASE IDAR2002071340SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED2002/09/12TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE1979/01/17DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, chp10.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004290C070208

    Original file (20040004290C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 January 1979, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. On 12 February 1979, the applicant was discharged with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions after completing 2 years, 2 months, and 5 days of active service with 83 days lost time due to AWOL. The applicant's record of service shows he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019224

    Original file (20110019224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a medical discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007237C070206

    Original file (20050007237C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitation. The applicant did submit an obituary for his grandmother which shows her funeral was conducted on 27 August 1974 and records do show he was AWOL around that period of time. The applicant also submitted the obituary of his brother which shows he passed away on 29 July 1975; however, records do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013204

    Original file (20100013204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his voluntary request for discharge, the applicant indicated he understood by requesting discharge that the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge was authorized. On 5 April 1982, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of a DD Form 794A (Other than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to a GD.