Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011829
Original file (20140011829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011829 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: 

* he retired in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7
* he completed additional military occupational specialties (MOS) 

2.  The applicant states he served in Korea from 1968 to 1969.  While there, he made SFC/E-7.  He was reduced to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 but he was told after 20 years his grade would be reinstated.   He completed 20 years of active service and he believes he should have retired as a SFC/E-7.  Additionally, he held other MOS's which are not listed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a certificate of training.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 February 1953 and held MOS 1844 (Cannoneer).  He was honorably released from active duty on 21 January 1955.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) listed his specialty number. 

3.  He enlisted in the RA on 7 February 1955.  He held MOS 141.60 (Light and Medium Field Artillery Crewman).  He was honorably discharged on 6 February 1961 for the purpose of reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 listed his specialty number as 141.60.

4.  He reenlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 7 February 1961 and he held MOS 13B (Light and Medium Field Artillery Crewman).  He was honorably discharged in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on 8 February 1967 for the purpose of reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 listed his specialty number as 13B.

5.  He reenlisted in the RA on 9 February 1967.  He served in Korea from 17 January 1968 to 17 April 1969.  He was advanced to SFC/E-7 on 14 February 1969 by authority of Special Orders Number 46, issued by Headquarters, 2nd Infantry Division.

6.  On 18 March 1969, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for absenting himself from his appointed place of duty in violation of a written order of quarantine of 2nd Infantry Division personnel from 14 February to 3 March 1969 and for being absent from his unit on 1 March 1969. 

7.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to SSG/E-6 and a written reprimand. He appealed his punishment on 18 March 1969.  However, his appeal was denied by the Commanding General, I Corps, on 11 April 1969.

8.  He was honorably discharged in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on 14 January 1970 for the purpose of reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 listed his specialty number as 13B.

9.  He reenlisted in the RA on 15 January 1970 and he continued to hold MOS 13B.  He served in Vietnam from September 1970 to September 1971.  Following completion of his Vietnam tour, he was reassigned to Fort Sill, OK.  

10.  On 5 February 1973, he accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ for being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a result of previous indulgence in intoxicating liquor. 

11.  Following approval of his request for voluntary retirement, Headquarters, U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, published Special Orders Number 13 ordering his transfer to the transition center and retirement in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 1 April 1973.  

12.  He retired on 31 March 1973 and he was placed on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SSG/E-6, effective 1 April 1973.  He completed 20 years, 1 month, and 16 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 shows in: 

* Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) – SSG
* Item 5b (Pay Grade) – E-6
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) – 18 March 1969
* Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) – 13B4O, 12 December 1955, Field Artillery Crewman (tested in MOS February 1972 and score)

13.  He provides a certificate of training dated 10 April 1968 that shows he completed the Straight Scope Operator's Training Course, Modified, at Camp Pelham, Korea. 

14.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: 

* Item 22 (MOS), he was awarded primary MOS 13B on 12 December 1955 and secondary MOS 63C (General Vehicle Repairman) on 18 July 1967
* Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he was advanced to SFC/E-7 on 14 February 1969 and reduced to SSG/E-6 on 18 March 1969

15.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders.

16.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 of 



the regulation in effect at the time contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states:

* items 5a and 5b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders
* item 6 shows the date of rank
* item 23a lists the primary specialty code and number

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ that resulted in his reduction from SFC/E-7 to SSG/E-6 on 18 March 1969.  He held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 from the date of reduction to the date of retirement.  There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was selected for promotion back to SFC between the date of reduction and the date of retirement.  As such, his DD Form 214 correctly lists his rank/ grade, and date of rank.  Additionally, because he did not serve satisfactorily in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, he is not entitled to retire in that rank/grade.  There is neither an error nor an injustice.  He is not entitled to this portion of the requested relief

2.  The applicant held an artillery MOS throughout most of his military service.  Although he was awarded secondary MOS 63C on 18 July 1967, the regulation governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 at the time of his retirement required an entry for the primary MOS.  His primary MOS was 13B.  It is correctly listed in item 23a of his DD Form 214 and there is no reason to change it.  There is neither an error nor an injustice.  He is also not entitled to this portion of the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011829





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011829



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026432

    Original file (20100026432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * Item 22 (MOS) shows he was awarded MOS 13A (FA Basic) on 10 February 1969, awarded primary MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist) on 9 August 1969, and primary MOS 36K (Field Wireman) on 9 March 1970 * Item 27 (Military Education) shows he completed the FA Basic Course in MOS 13A in 1969 * Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served in Vietnam from 12 February 1969 through 21 April 1970 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009887

    Original file (20060009887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous application requesting that Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his 27 August 1970 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) as 13B (Cannon Crewmember) and that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be corrected to show his entitlement to marksmanship qualification badges based on his qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006291

    Original file (20120006291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the following new facts are not reflected in his Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceeding nor are they reflected in his military records (DA Form 24 (Service Record) and DD Form 214): a. He provides his DA Form 24, prepared on 22 January 1962, for the period 28 October 1955 to 26 October 1957; and his DA Form 20. His record contains: * DA Form 24 for the period 28 October 1955 to 25 October 1957 which shows he was promoted to SP3 (T) on 24 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007023

    Original file (20140007023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows his rank/grade as SSG/E-6 and that he completed 20 years and 3 days of active service. Promotions to E-7, E-8, and E-8 were (and continue to be) centralized at the Department of the Army Level via annual promotion boards that select Soldiers for advancement to the next higher grade. Since the applicant was not selected for promotion by a promotion board, he is not entitled to promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010831

    Original file (20110010831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Having had prior active enlisted service from 2 August 1965 to 1 August 1968 and 13 January 1970 to 18 May 1974 (he was discharged as a specialist five (SP5)/E5), the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Massachusetts ARNG (MAARNG) on 8 March 1979 for 3 years in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. Title 10, USC, section 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted member reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) states a Reserve enlisted member of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011324

    Original file (20100011324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant was promoted to the rank of SSG prior to 5 September 1972 and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show differently. His DD Form 214 shows he separated as an SP5; however, the MOS shown on his DD Form 214 is 13B4O. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank as SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018042

    Original file (20110018042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to SFC/E-7 and placed on the Retired List that same rank/grade. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on the date he retired from active duty. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010262

    Original file (20080010262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was reassigned from the Retired Reserve to the Ready Reserve by authority of Department of the Army, Office of the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Administration Center, St. Louis, MO Letter Orders Number 07-20141, dated 26 July 1971, in the rank of SFC. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant, while on active duty in the Regular Army, was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 29 August 1969, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he held on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009970

    Original file (20120009970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. HQDA will determine the needs of the Army by grade and MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012737

    Original file (20130012737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1979, he was honorably retired from the Army, by reason of sufficient service for retirement, at the conclusion of 20 years and 5 days of active service. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show he was retired in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7. Army Regulation 15-80 provides that service in a higher grade will normally be considered unsatisfactory if reversion to a lower grade results from the sentence of a court-martial.