Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011759
Original file (20140011759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	 

		BOARD DATE:	  18 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011759 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) dated 15 August 2008 be removed from his record.  

2.  He states a permanent profile is contained in his record in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS).  In 2003, he was seen for heart palpitations, and he was sent to be checked for anxiety to rule that out as a cause for the palpitations.  Everything was fine.  He was never diagnosed by the Army or a civilian provider with anxiety.  In 2009, he saw a civilian doctor for about 10 minutes as part of his periodic health assessment (PHA), and he mentioned the problem he had in 2003.  The civilian doctor recorded it in his PHA and initiated a permanent profile for anxiety.  He was not aware the profile existed in his records, and it almost prevented his deployment to Afghanistan in 2010.  In 2012, he corrected the issue through the 63rd Regional Support Command (RSC) and he now has a physical profile serial of "111111"; however, the earlier profile is still in his iPERMS record.    

3.  He provides:

* DA Forms 3349
* DD Form 2807-1 (Report of Medical History)
* DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination)
* laboratory reports
* Occupational Health Service Audiology Form
* memorandum, subject:  Results of Retention Physical Examination

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 31 May 2005, after completing a period of Regular Army service, the applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  He has served in the USAR since that date.  

2.  His Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) maintained in iPERMS includes the following documents:

	a.  A DA Form 2807-1, dated 10 July 2008, shows he underwent a retention medical examination.  For item 17e (Received counseling of any type), he marked "yes."  In item 29 (Explanation of "Yes" Answer(s)), he explained his response to item 17e by stating, "Due to palpatations [sic], physician thought I was stressed/anxiety and sent to mental health."  

	b.  A DD Form 2808, dated 10 July 2008, shows he was found qualified for service pending review by command authority.  The form shows that on 
15 August 2008 he was assigned a rating of "2" for physical profile rating factor "S" (Psychiatric).  Item 76 (Significant or Disqualifying Defects) shows a diagnosis of anxiety.  

	c.  A DA Form 3349, dated 15 August 2008, shows he was given a permanent physical profile rating of "2" for physical profile rating factor "S."  He was rated as "1" for the five other rating factors.  

	d.  A memorandum, subject:  Results of Retention Physical Examination, dated 19 August 2008, shows he was found physically fit for retention and that the results of the examination required the command surgeon's review or appropriate action.  The memorandum noted, in part, that the applicant's heart palpitations might need further evaluation.  

	e.  A DA Form 3349, dated 17 August 2012, shows he was given physical profile serial ratings of "1" for all rating factors.  Item 8 (Functional Limitations and Capabilities and Other Comments) contains the following statement – 

Active PULHES: 111112 (Last Issued:  20111214).  This [is] a DOWNGRADE of S2 to S1 for anxiety.  [Department of Veterans Affairs] behavioral health provider treating [service member] states 20120410:  has no psychiatric complaints or observable symptoms.  He is rendered to have no psychiatric issues, including anxiety or any psychiatric diagnoses.  Internal Medicine note 20120810 states SM has no functional capacity limitations and has no medical diagnosis.  There is sufficient evidence to support a downgrade to a S1.  There is insufficient support for limitations in block 5.  If the Soldier feels this physical profile is too restrictive, if the condition(s) worsens, or if the command feels that a more restrictive profile is required, additional documentation can be submitted to the profiling authority in the Soldier's chain of command to the 63D RSC Surgeon's Office.

3.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel (MILPER) Information Management/Records) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the MILPER Information Management/Records Program of the MILPER System.  It states that once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from the OMPF or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by competent authority.  

4.  The Army Soldier Records Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, maintains a list of documents required to be filed in iPERMS.  Documents that will be filed include the DA Form 3349.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to remove a DA Form 3349 dated 15 August 2008 from his record.  

2.  The DA Form 3349 in question is part of the applicant's medical history and should remain in the record.  Although the information on the DA Form 3349 in question has been superseded by a more recent physical profile, there is no evidence indicating the form reflects anything other than a proper medical opinion that was based on the medical evidence available when the form was created, and there is no evidence indicating it was improperly filed.  Therefore, there is no basis for removing it from his record.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011759





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011759



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014773

    Original file (20100014773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds that during the examination he provided information regarding anxiety and ADD he was being treated for at that time. His Medical Record form shows the following three comments: a. The applicant's request to have information concerning being diagnosed with anxiety and ADD be removed from his retention medical examination was considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016070

    Original file (20130016070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, addition of the following medical conditions to his unfitting conditions and an increase in his disability rating: * post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * degenerative disc disease (spine with right upper extremity radiculopathy) * sleep apnea 2. He was initially rated for PTSD in September 2008, but an MEB psychiatrist downgraded the PTSD diagnosis to an Army MEB diagnosis of major depression with anxiety disorder and the PEB rated this condition as 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001082

    Original file (20090001082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. The applicant states that the supporting documents he provides show that these medical conditions existed at the time he was an active duty Soldier; however, the MEBD/PEB did not consider them. On 7 February 2006, the MEBD was provided to the PEB and did not contain the 17 January 2006 information; however, he offers that the applicant’s medical records that were sent with the MEBD may have included the documents. Since there is no evidence of record to show that the applicant's medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009854

    Original file (20140009854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was denied his right to request referral to a PEB * he was not properly counseled regarding the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) process for Reservists * he was previously issued a permanent physical profile in 2004 while activated and underwent the PEB process which at the time found him fit for duty * he misunderstood the PEB process for a Reservist in a troop program unit to be the same as the PEB process he went through as an activated Reservist *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000558

    Original file (20140000558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 2807-1 (Report of Medical History) and a DA Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), showing a date of examination of 27 November 2006 and dated 8 January 2007, show he underwent a medical examination at MacDill Air Force Base for the purpose of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). His record is void of any evidence that shows an MEB was convened, the condition(s) the board considered, and/or the board's recommendation. Consequently, the applicant's medical conditions, although...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023804

    Original file (20110023804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions), for medical reasons. His DD Form 214 should show he was discharged for a disability because he has medical records that show he had several medical conditions that determined he was unfit for the Army, such as plantar fasciitis, lower back pain, and knee and ankle pain. The evaluation was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001100

    Original file (20140001100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because the applicant's physical condition was not medically unfitting for retention at the time of his discharge there was no basis for a medical retirement or disability separation from active duty. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated from active duty. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020213

    Original file (20120020213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Postal Service delivery confirmations * handwritten notes * copies of U.S. Uniformed Services Identification Cards * orders * administration data printouts * printout of an Integrated Web Services transaction * copies 1 and 4 of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * memorandum, subject: Medical Determination for [Applicant], dated 12 December 2008 * memorandum, subject: Commander's Performance Statement [Applicant], dated 19 April 2009 * memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020668

    Original file (20120020668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she had the condition of major depressive disorder at the time of her discharge in 2003. e. The applicant has provided insufficient evidence that the condition of depressive disorder was unfitting at the time of her separation from the military in 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021617

    Original file (20140021617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be provided a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) for combat-related injuries received in Iraq on 19 December 2003 while assigned to the 402nd Civil Affairs Battalion. A DA Form 3349, dated 19 November 2012, shows that under the PULHES he was assigned a physical profile of 2 under P (physical) and 2 under H (hearing). Those members who do not meet medical retention standards are referred to a PEB for a determination of...