Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011634
Original file (20140011634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE: 24 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011634


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was retired due to physical disability.

2.  The applicant states he was given a 60 percent disability rating by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) but only received a 20 percent disability rating from the U.S. Army when he retired.  He believes the Army rating is unjust and wants the Army to increase its rating and grant him a retirement based on his medical condition.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Medical documents from the Texas Pain and Spine Institute, dated between March and May 2012 (14 pages)
* Letter from the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR), dated 
12 June 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 29 January 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember).



2.  A DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) approved on 24 October 2011 shows that an informal PEB reconsidered the applicant's physical condition on 3 October 2011.  The PEB found the applicant unfit due to:

	a.  VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5237 for a lumbar strain rated at 10 percent disabling; and

	b.  VASRD code 5271 for right ankle osteoarthritis rated at 10 percent disabling.

	c.  He was given a combined disability rating of 20 percent.

	d.  The PEB also indicated the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) had listed four additional medical conditions which the PEB determined were not unfitting and therefore not ratable because they did not limit any of the applicant's Soldier functions.

	e.  The PEB recommended that the applicant be separated with severance pay, if otherwise qualified.  The applicant was counseled regarding the PEB findings and determination.  He concurred with the findings.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 22 January 2012 due to disability, severance pay, combat related (enhanced).  He was a staff sergeant, pay grade E-6 and had completed 13 years, 11 months, and 24 days of creditable active duty service.

4.  The medical documents provided by the applicant indicate that he was evaluated and treated by the Texas Pain and Spine Institute for lower back pain.

5.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has an impairment rated at less than 30-percent disabling.  It further provides at section 1201 for the physical disability retirement of a member who has an impairment rated at least 30-percent disabling.

6.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 310 and 331, permit the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered physically unfit for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge, or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was retired due to physical disability because he has received a higher disability rating from the VA.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was evaluated by a PEB while on active duty and he was found unfit for duty due to two medical conditions and given a combined disability rating of 20 percent.  He concurred with these findings and was subsequently discharged with severance pay.

3.  The applicant has not provided any documentary evidence showing the VA provided him a higher rating for the two conditions found unfitting by the PEB.  It is noted that the applicant suffered from four other medical conditions that were not determined to be unfitting.  It is highly probable that the VA rating to which the applicant refers also includes those additional conditions which did not qualify to receive a rating by the Army.

4.  There is no evidence showing that what the Army did at the time of his discharge was in error or unjust.

5.  An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation from the Army.  Operating under its own policies and regulations, the VA has neither the authority nor the responsibility for determining medical unfitness for military duty, it awards ratings because a medical condition is related to service (service connected) and affects the individual's civilian employability and/or social functioning.  Furthermore, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his or her lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.  The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated.

6.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010236



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011634



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010123

    Original file (20070010123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board found the applicant physically unfit and recommended he be separated with severance pay with a combined rating of 20 percent, if otherwise qualified. Physical evaluation boards are established to evaluate all cases of physical disability equitability for the Soldier and the Army. The available evidence shows the applicant appeared before a PEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017988

    Original file (20100017988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. the Army physical evaluation board (PEB) did not rate him for mood disorder; b. on 28 December 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated him 70 percent for mood disorder; c. the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) states that upon finding a service member unfit for duty and eligible for disability benefits, the PEB determines the percentage of disability based on guidelines set by the VA; d. the VASRD is used by both the military and the VA to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015769

    Original file (20120015769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * VA Rating Decision, dated 3 May 2012 * VA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the PDES cannot compensate him for these conditions, he may still apply for a disability rating for them through the VA since the VA operates under different regulations and guidelines and may compensate any service-connected condition, even if not unfitting at the time of separation. The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendation of the PEB on 25...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019126

    Original file (20080019126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and was granted a 10 percent disability rating for code 5241 (chronic low back pain), a 10 percent disability rating for codes 5099 and 5003 (chronic pain of the left shoulder and left knee), and a 10 percent disability rating for codes 5030 and 5261 (flexion contracture of the right knee). Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002137

    Original file (20090002137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The applicant's contention that he should be authorized medical retirement because he received a 90-percent VA rating for PTSD and additional medical conditions not considered by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018403

    Original file (20140018403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an increase in the disability rating she received by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for a back injury incurred while she was on active duty and that she receive a rating for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). The board acknowledged that she has cognitive impairment consistent with TBI, but the condition was not found unfitting by the original PEB and because TBI does not arise out of either condition found unfitting (PTSD and cervical spine disease), the board could...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004582

    Original file (20110004582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant was medically unfit and evaluated by a PEB. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059337C070421

    Original file (2001059337C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 11 May 2000, the PEB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014708

    Original file (20090014708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms a PEB, after examining all the medical evidence, determined the applicant was unfit for further service based on her "degenerative arthritis, lumbar spine pain," assigned a disability rating of 10 percent, and recommended her separation with severance pay. Although the applicant was later rated at 50-percent disabled by the VA based on all her service-connected medical conditions, this factor alone does not support a change to the disability rating assigned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008269

    Original file (20140008269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy (radicular pain in the low back and legs) at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in 1993, but the condition was not rated by the medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB). No other medical conditions were diagnosed or deemed medically unacceptable by the MEB and there is no evidence of record that he was diagnosed with other medical conditions. No other conditions were rated by the PEB.