Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011262
Original file (20140011262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  12 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011262 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) by deleting from item 18 (Remarks) the entry "Separation Pay - - $53010.66."

2.  The applicant states the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) sent a letter to his congressman indicating he would not be receiving separation pay since he did not enlist to serve 3 years in the Army National Guard (ARNG).  He has no issue with the decision because he only enlisted for 2 years.
   
   a.  However, when the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) approved his claim for service connected compensation, he was informed that the VA was withholding the amount of separation pay until it is "paid back."

   b.  His DD Form 214 shows an entitlement to separation pay; however, he didn't receive the money.  In order to resolve this matter, the entry on his 
DD Form 214 referring to separation pay must be removed.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the following documents –

* his separation orders with amendment
* DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) and allied documents
* VA letter
* congressional letter
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 20 May 1999.  Through a series of reenlistments in the RA, he continued to serve on active duty.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 68W (Health Care Specialist) and he attained the rank of sergeant (E-5).

2.  Headquarters, Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, LA, Orders
199–0319, dated 18 July 2013, reassigned the applicant to the Fort Polk Transition Center for separation processing and discharge on 6 November 2013. The additional instructions show, in pertinent part, "(6)  YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SEPARATION PAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH [IAW TITLE 10] UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1174 [10 USC 1174]."

3.  Headquarters, Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, LA, Orders
254–0323, dated 11 September 2013, amended Orders 199-0319, dated 18 July 2013, in pertinent part, to change the additional instructions to read, "(6)  YOU ARE ENTITLED TO FULL SEPARATION PAY IAW 10 USC 1174."  The order was also amended to add that he was to be assigned to:  "Detachment 1, Medical Command (W8Z8A1), Building 805, F Street, Camp Beauregard, LA  71360."

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (as corrected by a DD Form 215) shows he was honorably discharged on 6 November 2013 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Agreement), based on completion of required active service with separation code "JBK" (involuntary discharge –
completion of required active service).  He had completed 14 years, 5 months, and 17 days of net active service this period.  It also shows in:

* item 9 (Command To Which Transferred):  "SEE BLOCK 18"
* item 18 (Remarks), in part:

* "SEPARATION PAY - - $53010.66"
* "BLOCK 9:  DET 1 MEDICAL COMMAND (W8Z8A1), BLDG 805,
F STREET, CAMP BEAUREGARD LA  71360"

5.  A DD Form 4 (with allied documents) shows the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and Louisiana ARNG (LAARNG) on 10 September 2013 for a period of 2 years and that he was assigned to Detachment 1, Medical Command, Camp Beauregard, LA  71360.


6.  In support of his application the applicant provides, in part, the following documents:

   a.  VA letter, dated 25 March 2014, that shows the VA approved his claim for service connected compensation and outlined the monthly entitlement amounts to be withheld through 1 September 2019 based on recoupment of separation pay.  It also shows the reason the VA withheld benefits was because the applicant received separation pay in the amount of $53,010.66 (before taxes) from the military and the VA must hold back compensation until the separation amount is paid back.  The VA deducted federal taxes in the amount of 25 percent to arrive at a net separation pay of $39,758.00 and informed him that after the amount is paid back, he will start receiving his full monthly VA compensation.  He was also advised that if he has evidence which shows the net amount is not correct, he should submit it to the VA.
   
   b.  A letter from the Deputy Director, Operations, DFAS, dated 5 June 2014, to the Honorable C. F____ F____, M.D., U.S. House of Representatives, that provided information in response to his inquiry on behalf of the applicant regarding his full separation pay.  It shows DFAS is unable to comply with his request to pay out full separation pay.  DFAS explained that one of the eligibility requirements to receive Half or Full Separation Pay is that the Soldier must enter into a written agreement to serve a minimum of 3 years in the Individual Ready Reserves of the Service concerned.  DFAS confirmed the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS on 7 November 2013 for a period of 2 years and, therefore, he is not entitled to separation pay.  DFAS advised that the applicant could apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for a decision regarding the entitlement to Full Separation Pay.

7.  DoD Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, volume 7A (Military Pay Policy and Procedures – Active Duty and Reserve Pay), chapter 35 (Separation Payments), paragraph 350201 (Full Separation Pay), provides that, beginning on 20 June 1991, full payment of non-disability separation pay has been authorized to Military Service members of the Regular and Reserve Components who have been involuntarily separated from active duty and have met the specified conditions –

* the member's separation must be characterized as "honorable"
* the member is on active duty and has completed at least 6 years, but less than 20 years, of active service 
* the member is separated involuntarily through either the denial of reenlistment or the denial of continuation on active duty
* the member must have entered into a written agreement with the Military Service concerned to serve in the Ready Reserve of a Reserve Component of the Armed Forces for a minimum period of 3 years following the separation from active duty

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army and contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214.  It shows for item 18, for a Soldier receiving separation/readjustment or non-disability severance pay (as indicated by the finance office), enter type of pay and amount.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected by deleting from item 18 the entry, "Separation Pay - - $53010.66."

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged from the RA due to an involuntary separation based on completion of required active service.

3.  The applicant's separation orders (as amended) authorized entitlement to Full Separation Pay based on his enlistment in the ARNGUS and LAARNG with assignment to Detachment 1, Medical Command, Camp Beauregard, LA  71360.

   a.  The evidence of record shows full payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized, in pertinent part, if a Soldier enters into a written agreement with the Military Service concerned to serve in the Ready Reserve of a Reserve Component of the Armed Forces for a minimum period of 3 years (emphasis added) following the separation from active duty.

   b.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS and LAARNG for a period of 2 years.

   c.  Thus, based on the evidence of record, the applicant is not entitled to separation pay.

4.  There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received payment of separation pay at the time of his discharge.  In addition, the evidence of record shows that DFAS confirmed the applicant is not entitled to nor did he receive separation pay.


5.  Thus, based on the evidence of record it is concluded that the applicant's separation orders and his DD Form 214 contain erroneous entries regarding separation pay.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records by deleting those entries from his separation documents.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  amending the additional instructions of Headquarters, Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, LA, Orders 199–0319, dated 18 July 2013 (as amended by Orders 254-0323, dated 11 September 2013), to read:  "(6)  YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SEPARATION PAY IAW 10 USC 1174"; and

   b.  deleting from item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry, "SEPARATION PAY- - $53010.66."




      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011262



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011262



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018756

    Original file (20140018756.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program prior to transferring to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve). Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his military record to show he elected to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his eligible family members prior to his retirement date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008139

    Original file (20140008139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 24 August 2000, shows he was treated on 18 August 2000 at the Troop Medical Clinic (TMC), Camp Beauregard, LA, for an injury that was incurred on that date. Medical records, dated between 18 August 2000 and 25 February 2002, show he was treated as follows: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007310

    Original file (20130007310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a DA Form 2173, dated 24 August 2000, wherein it shows he was treated on 18 August 2000 at the Troop Medical Clinic (TMC), Camp Beauregard, LA, for an injury that was incurred on that date. He provides medical records, dated between 18 August 2000 and 25 February 2002, wherein they show he was treated as follows: a. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013319

    Original file (20100013319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states: * he was not notified he was selected to appear before the FY 2009 LTC - COL APL DA Board * the RCS-AG-601 (Reserve Officers Eligible for Promotion) roster did not list him as a selectee for board consideration * a Military Personnel (MILPER) message accompanied the RCS-AG-601 stating no new LTCs/pay grade O-5 would be considered by the FY 2009 LTC - COL APL DA Board for promotion to COL/pay grade O-6 * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) cannot show that the supplemental RCS-AG-601...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013002

    Original file (20130013002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show, in effect: * he was injured at Fort Dix, NJ and received medical treatment on 15 July 1989 * the separation date on his 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect a date in 1991 * pay for active duty during November and December 1990 2. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was injured and received medical treatment on or about 15 July 1989, REFRAD in 1991,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012976

    Original file (20120012976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the Medical and Dental School Stipend Program (MDSSP) incentive offered when she signed her contract on 19 October 2011. The applicant states: * an oversight made by the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) regarding her eligibility for the MDSSP incentive caused the U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) board results to show she was ineligible * a packet was sent to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and she was paid for 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005660

    Original file (20140005660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a DD Form 2278, dated 20 July 2004, which shows the estimated cost of his move was $3,778.25. He provided a letter he sent to DFAS, dated 9 May 2013, wherein he stated that he had completed all the necessary steps required of him when he completed the PPM. As specified in the JFTR and confirmed by DFAS, the minimum documents required to file for reimbursement of actual expenses for a PPM are a DD Form 2278, certified weight tickets, travel orders, and a completed DD Form 1351-2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022300

    Original file (20130022300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as then in effect, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army and contained item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The applicant's separation orders and his DD Form 214 authorized him to receive to full separation pay in the amount of $26,954.07. There is no evidence of record showing the applicant received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015153

    Original file (20130015153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of the documents below to show his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was a combat-related disability: * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings), dated 24 July 2001 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 17 October 2001 * Record of Proceedings (ROP) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR), dated 1 November 2012 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008215

    Original file (20130008215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions), chapter 7 (SSB), paragraph 7-3 (Cases Not Considered), provides, in part, that an officer will not be considered or reconsidered for promotion by an SSB when the following occurs: an administrative error was immaterial, or the officer, in exercising reasonable diligence, could have discovered and corrected the error in the ORB or AMHRR. The evidence of record shows the applicant's ORB that was reviewed by the FY13 MAJ PSB was missing 14 months...