Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011199
Original file (20140011199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 February 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011199 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his educational benefits to his children under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states:

* his TEB was changed from approved to rejected
* it changed because he did not have 4 years remaining on his enlistment contract
* he was medically retired and his children are entitled to his G.I. Bill benefits
* he completed the TEB several months before he was discharged
* his son is about to go to college and he does not have the ability to pay for it
* he did not receive any information informing him that his TEB had been denied
* he was informed that his children would be eligible for his educational benefits because he was medically discharged through a medical evaluation board (MEB)
* he had a 70% disability rating; he is now 90% disabled due to back problems
* the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is adjusting his rating and in the process of giving him unemployable status

3.  The applicant provides his retirement orders. 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records show the applicant completed 5 years, 6 months, and 15 days of total active service for retired pay in the Army National Guard (ARNG).  On 2 February 2005, following his ARNG service, he enlisted in the Regular Army and executed several reenlistments.  His records show he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist).  

2.  On 28 September 2012, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found that he was physically unfit and recommended that he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired list.  

3.  Orders 347-0913, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center of Excellence and Fort Gordon, dated 12 December 2013, show he was released from assignment and duty because of a physical disability.  His effective date of retirement was 7 February 2013.  He completed 9 years and 4 months of service for disability retirement and 10 years, 1 month, and 4 days of 1405 service.

4.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 2013 shows he completed 8 years and 6 months of net active service this period.
 
5.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: 
 
	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

   b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

6.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was authorized to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  Records show his request to transfer his benefits was submitted via the MilConnect website on 8 August 2012.  He was issued retirement orders on      12 December 2012.  The applicant was discharged due to disability effective        7 February 2013.  

3.  The available evidence shows that the applicant had completed 
10 or more years of service as of his initial TEB request dated 8 August 2012.  Furthermore, he was unauthorized to make any commitment for further military service due to his physical disability.  Therefore, he would have been eligible for TEB.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members prior to his retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.




      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011199





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011199



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000286

    Original file (20140000286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 November 2004, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and he was discharged on 19 January 2005 after completing 2 months and 16 days of creditable active service. As there is evidence that the applicant did attempt to transfer the benefits to his spouse and children, and there is no evidence he was counseled on his need to submit an exception to policy to commit to the additional service, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he submitted an exception to policy to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005002

    Original file (20140005002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he did not know that he had to complete the [submission] on milConnect to complete the transfer * he would have completed the transfer before he was medically retired if he had known that the transfers were not enforced * he retired for medical reasons with 17 years and 8 months of service * he applied for his children to be the beneficiaries of his Post 9-11 GI Bill in June 2011 and thought everything was OK since he did not receive a hard confirmation copy * when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017881

    Original file (20140017881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to family members. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty until his disability retirement on 26 January 2012. As he had over 10 years of active duty service, he would have been eligible to transfer any unused education benefits to his eligible family members through the TEB database.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001210

    Original file (20130001210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he requested to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill and that such request was received and approved. The applicant provides copies of: * Letter from HRC to the applicant's Senator, dated 21 December 2012 * TEB Request, dated 2 January 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010867

    Original file (20130010867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his dependent daughter (Megan) is 22 years old, permanently disabled, totally dependent on others for her self-care, and she will not be able to use any further educational benefits. Because it appears the applicant erroneously requested transfer of benefits to his daughter Megan, who was severely incapacitated, it would be appropriate in this case to correct the applicant's military records to show he elected to transfer a portion of his benefits to his daughter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011778

    Original file (20120011778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or children (if he completed the request before leaving military service). Counsel requests, in effect, the applicant be given relief by correcting his records to show he elected to transfer benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his eligible family members prior to his retirement date. The applicant and counsel contend his record should be corrected to allow him to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000223

    Original file (20150000223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is not much he can give his children who followed him during their growing-up years and had to be uprooted during high school because he was again being transferred * receiving the educational benefits is one small way he can demonstrate his appreciation for the sacrifices they made during his career * he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time it was first authorized in June 2009 because he already had a master's degree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019543

    Original file (20110019543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval of transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. He is not eligible to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. Therefore, the applicant was not in an active status on 1 August 2009 and is not eligible to transfer his education benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004885

    Original file (20130004885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states the email message and memorandum from two GOMO staff officers confirm that the retirement briefing and retirement application now include information to make general officers aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to retirement. g. A memorandum to the applicant, dated 13 February 2013, shows the GOMO Chief confirmed information pertaining to the TEB option under the Post-9/11 GI Bill was not included in the GOMO retirement briefing or retirement application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013353

    Original file (20130013353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    , dated 14 December 2012 * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Implementation of the Proposed Policy to Allow Officers Who are Twice Non-Selected for Promotion to Colonel (COL) to have the 4-year MSO Shortened if They Seek to Retire, dated 29 January 2013 * Post 911 GI Bill Frequently Asked Questions * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Voluntary Retirement, dated 6 December 2012 * Milconnect Transfer of Education Benefits CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In her request, she stated that she...