Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011070
Original file (20140011070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  5 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011070 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant defers to counsel.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests, in effect, reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request to correct his records to show he was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG) effective 17 December 2005 with back pay and allowances.

2.  Counsel states:

	a.  Through no fault of his own, and through U.S. Government neglect, the applicant was not promoted to SSG on 17 December 2005.

	b.  From 2005 to present the applicant has sought to gain administrative relief.  On 14 January 2014, he received partial relief.  He now seeks full relief from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) after having exhausted all other administrative remedies.

	c.  On 17 November 2005, the applicant received an enlisted promotion system (EPS) letter advising him of his promotion to SSG in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG).  On that date, he accepted the promotion to SSG.  On 5 December 2005, the TXARNG acknowledged that the promotion offer was accepted.  On 5 January 2006, a properly-executed DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) was properly filed and his enlistment was extended for 1 year.

	d.  On 13 January 2006, the TXARNG asked the applicant's command for the required DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) which his command had failed to submit.  A DA Form 4187 had been prepared by his command; but through command negligence was not submitted.

	e.  On 27 January 2006, the applicant was released from active duty.

	f.  Due to a medical condition which was combat-related, the applicant was medically retired from the TXARNG on 11 November 2013.  He completed 24 years, 10 months, and 9 days of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60.

	g.  After Congressional intervention, the TXARNG promoted the applicant to SSG effective 11 November 2013.  From 17 December 2005 to 11 November 2013, the applicant held the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

	h.  The TXARNG admits the error.

3.  Counsel provides:

* EPS promotion letter and related documents
* DA Form 4836
* DA Form 4187
* request for extension on active duty
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service)
* letter from the U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board, dated 2 November 2012
* undated, letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command
* letter to a Member of Congress, dated 31 January 2014
* promotion orders, dated 14 January 2014
* discharge orders, dated 15 January 2014 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20080010571 on 6 November 2008.

2.  Counsel provided documentation that shows the applicant was notified in November 2005 he had been selected for promotion to SSG/E-6.  On 17 November 2005, he accepted the SSG/E-6 position offered to him.  On 5 December 2005, the TXARNG acknowledged the applicant had accepted the promotion offer and requested preparation of a DA Form 4187 and DA Form 4836 for the promotion and extension/reenlistment for a period of 12 months (1 year).

3.  The EPS promotion letter and related documents are new evidence that will be considered by the Board.

4.  Having prior enlisted service in the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and ARNG, the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on 24 April 2004.

5.  He was ordered to active duty on 26 June 2004 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Iraq from 23 November 2004 to 26 October 2005.

6.  A DA Form 4836, dated 5 January 2006, shows the applicant extended his enlistment for a period of 1 year.

7.  Counsel provided an incomplete DA Form 4187, dated 5 January 2006, which shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6; however, the effective date is blank.

8.  On 27 January 2006, the applicant was released from active duty.

9.  His records contain an NGB Form 22 showing he was discharged from the TXARNG on 23 October 2007 by reason of expiration term of service.

10.  Counsel provided an NGB Form 22 showing the applicant was honorably discharged from the TXARNG on 12 November 2013 and he was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List.

11.  TXARNG Orders 014-057, dated 14 January 2014, promoted the applicant to SSG effective 11 November 2013.

12.  TXARNG Orders 018-061, dated 15 January 2014, honorably discharged the applicant from the TXARNG and reassigned him to the USAR Retired Reserve in the rank of SSG.

13.  Counsel provided a letter from the TXARNG to a Member of Congress, dated 31 January 2014, which states:

* the applicant accepted promotion to SSG on 17 November 2005
* nearly a month later the required documentation had not been submitted by the TXARNG
* due to the non-response, the applicant's promotion offer was rescinded
* his term of service subsequently expired and he was discharged
* the TXARNG could not determine why the applicant's chain of command never submitted all of the documents required for his promotion
* the applicant was promoted to SSG effective 11 November 2013

14.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB, dated 20 February 2015.  The NGB recommended approval of the applicant's request.  The advisory official states:

	a.  The applicant believes his promotion to SSG was delayed and incorrectly dated due to U.S. Governmental neglect and the untimely processing of his approved supporting documentation.

	b.  On 17 November 2005, he received a TXARNG EPS letter advising him of his promotion to SSG.  On this same date, he accepted the promotion to SSG with a suspense date of 17 December 2005.

	c.  On 5 December 2005, the TXARNG acknowledged via email that the promotion offer was accepted.  Also, the gaining unit was to complete and processed a DA Form 4187 for promotion and a DA Form 4836 for a 1-year extension/reenlistment.

	d.  On 5 January 2006, the DA Form 4836 was executed, extending the applicant for 1 year.

	e.  On 13 January 2006, the TXARNG completed the DA Form 4187 but failed to submit the form for processing.  Due to no fault of the applicant, the promotion was never completed because the command's negligent mishandling of the documents.

	f.  On 14 January 2014, the applicant was retroactively promoted to SSG effective 11 November 2013, due to physical disability retirement.

	g.  On 15 January 2014, he was retroactively medically discharged to the USAR Retired Reserve effective 12 November 2013.

	h.   The applicant should have been promoted effective 17 November 2005, the date of his promotion offer, acceptance, and signed approval.

	i.  The NGB recommended correction of the applicant's effective date of promotion to SSG to 17 November 2005 and payment of all back pay and allowances in the rank of SSG from the period 17 November 2005 to 11 November 2013.  Additionally, he should be placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 12 November 2013 and receive retired pay from that date to present.

	j.  This case recommendation was coordinated and reviewed with the NGB Enlisted Policy Section.

	k.  The TXARNG concurs with this recommendation.

15.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal.  He responded and accepted/concurred with the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record supports counsel's contention the applicant was not promoted to SSG on 17 December 2005 through U.S. Government neglect and no fault of his own.

2.  The NGB advisory official states the applicant should have been promoted effective 17 November 2005, the date of his promotion offer, acceptance, and signed approval.  The advisory opinion points out:

	a.  On 17 November 2005, the applicant received a TXARNG EPS letter advising him of his promotion to SSG.  On this same date, he accepted the EPS promotion to SSG with a suspense date of 17 December 2005.

	b.  On 5 December 2005, the TXARNG acknowledged via email that the promotion offer was accepted.  Also, the gaining unit was to complete and process a DA Form 4187 for promotion and a DA Form 4836 for a 1-year extension/reenlistment.

	c.  On 5 January 2006, the DA Form 4836 was executed, extending the applicant for 1 year.

	d.  On 13 January 2006, the TXARNG completed the DA Form 4187 but failed to submit the form for processing.

	e.  In January 2014, the applicant was retroactively promoted to SSG effective 11 November 2013.  He was also retroactively medically discharged from the TXARNG and assigned to the USAR Retired Reserve effective 12 November 2013.

3.  Based on the foregoing evidence and the NGB recommendation, it would be equitable to correct the applicant's records to show he was promoted to SSG effective 17 December 2005 with entitlement to all back pay and allowances.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  __x______  ___x_  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20080010571, dated 6 November 2008.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending TXARNG Orders 014-057, dated 14 January 2014, to show he was promoted to SSG effective 17 December 2005;

	b.  paying him all back pay and allowances due from 17 December 2005 to 11 November 2013 as a result of this correction; and

	c.  paying to him all back retired pay from 12 November 2013



      ___________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011070



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011070



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010571

    Original file (20080010571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 November 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010571 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military medical records are not available. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was selected for promotion to SSG/E-6 prior to his discharge from the TXARNG, there is an insufficient basis on which to change his rank in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022508

    Original file (20120022508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His transfer was to take effect 15 July 2001 and he kept SFC C----- informed as to the progress of his promotion and requested he look for an E-8 position anywhere within the state. According to the UMR's he provided there were four available E-8 positions: two 1SG positions, an operations sergeant position, and an intelligence sergeant position. He was promoted by the TXARNG to E-8 just prior to the transfer, but he was placed in an E-7 position by the AKARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022176

    Original file (20120022176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. According to the TXARNG, the applicant was on a promotion list for 13B from 2008-2011. f. The TXARNG states one Soldier was deployed and promoted to E5/SGT, MOS 13B2O who would have been below the applicant on the Enlisted Promotion (EPS) List. a. Paragraph 7-28a states States/territories will conduct annual promotion boards for each grade and publish a promotion list.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017122,

    Original file (20130017122,.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. In an email correspondence, dated 29 November 2001, SGM Yxxxxx requested the applicant be counseled regarding the SFC position offered by the AKARNG and that he would be assigned to an E-7 position, and that he had twelve months to find a new position or take an administrative reduction to SFC. He transferred to the AKARNG effective 15 July 2001 and he was assigned to an E-7 position.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004612

    Original file (20090004612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s request for reinstatement as an officer in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) was considered and denied by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 4 May 2006. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant met with The Adjutant General to discuss his discharge and that The Adjutant General allowed him to later enlist as an enlisted Soldier. The evidence of records further shows that, while in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000310

    Original file (20130000310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and retirement orders, physical disability information report, and acceptance notification of E-7 promotion. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (grade on retirement physical disability, members of the Armed Forces), states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001803

    Original file (20140001803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states: * he extended on active duty on 17 March 2006 while deployed, thereby establishing a new expiration term of service (ETS) date of 19 October 2009 * he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 3 December 2006 * he transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 November 2007 * he transferred from the Retired Reserve to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 10 June 2009 * he extended his contract in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 7 October 2009, making his new ETS date 19 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013672

    Original file (20100013672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired from the Army National Guard (ARNG) in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. On 5 December 1994, he submitted a DA Form 4187 requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 February 1995. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006985

    Original file (20130006985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 6 March 2012, he rebutted the recommendation for separation by stating he had met all the requirements of the last chance agreement and individually addressed the developmental counseling statements given to him by SFC HN. A memorandum addressed to the Minnesota National Guard IG, dated 7 March 2013, shows he requested reinstatement in the AGR program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001046

    Original file (20130001046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the Record of Proceedings (ROP), Discussions and Conclusions, paragraph 2, the Board states that "there is no evidence in the available record, nor has he submitted any evidence, showing he has yet been promoted or recommended for promotion to SSG even after the security clearance process was completed." Without the security clearance, the applicant was not promoted. Although in a previous advisory opinion an NGB official stated the applicant was granted a security clearance in February...