IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 July 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010881
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.
2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.
3. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.
2. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.
2. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records shows the diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD and panic disorder without agoraphobia were rendered during processing through the DES.
3. The SRP agreed there were no inappropriate changes in diagnoses and, therefore, determined that MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicants possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.
4. The SRP agreed that Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting PTSD was supported by the evidence. The applicant appeared to have met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders IV TR (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD; therefore, the diagnosis of PTSD was the appropriate diagnosis, and application of the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 was correct at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry.
5. The SRP carefully reviewed the evidence for a separate diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia and determined the diagnosis was appropriately rendered and appropriately adjudicated as a co-morbid condition. The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at time of placement on the TDRL. The higher rating is for "Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood. Available treatment records at the time leading up to TDRL entry recorded no history of suicidal attempts, no psychiatric hospitalizations, no visits to the emergency room for panic attacks or other MH concerns; the applicants panic attacks had decreased to less than one per week, and there was no evidence of impairment in thinking or judgment recorded in any of the mental status examinations. No MH condition was ever profiled.
6. The SRP determined that there was insufficient reasonable evidence for recommending a higher TDRL entry rating and concluded that the record in evidence best supported the 50 percent rating for TDRL entry.
7. The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ____x ___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010881
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015790
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in The diagnosis of the mental health condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015782
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The higher rating of 70 percent required demonstration of impairment in most areas, which was not supported by the record; she had not been hospitalized, there were no recorded suicidal ideations, and although the narrative summary (NARSUM) examiner stated her panic disorder was severe there were no recorded visits to the emergency room, no legal issues, and no evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000661
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP Panel deliberated on the IPEB descriptors and determined that all the MH conditions were listed, although not separately rated in accordance with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137
The SRP recommends no change in the applicants unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicants prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015802
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005872
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015771
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The applicant was not diagnosed with PTSD prior to TDRL entry, did not meet criteria for PTSD at TDRL exit, and the TDRL examiner noted his VA treating psychiatrist recorded MDD in partial remission as the only diagnosis. After due deliberation in consideration...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015747
The evidence of the available records shows diagnoses of PTSD and panic disorder without agoraphobia (MEB), and PTSD and alcohol abuse were rendered during processing through the Integrated DES process. The SRP must determine the most appropriate fit with VASRD section 4.130 criteria at the end of the TDRL interval for its permanent rating recommendation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that at the final TDRL evaluation the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015812
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the mental health condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015769
After a comprehensive review of the applicants case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change in the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the temporary disability and permanent retirement determination. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP noted the personality disorder was determined by the PEB to be a...