Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010788
Original file (20140010788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010788 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her military records by showing she is eligible to be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC).

2.  The applicant states that on 30 April 2006 she was honorably discharged from active duty as a captain.  At the time she had been selected for major, but she decided to get out instead of accepting the promotion.  She returned to serve in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 February 2010.  She was not considered by two promotion boards for major despite the fact that she was already qualified for consideration.  On 29 August 2011, she was promoted above the zone to major.  She understands that once she returned to active service she had to serve for a period of time in her unit before she could be considered for promotion.  However, in her case, she was not considered even after her year of service with the unit.  Now she is in a year group behind her peers for LTC even though she is eligible for consideration.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 30 April 2006
* Orders C-02-002846, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), dated 23 February 2010
* Orders B-10-106961, HRC, dated 25 October 2011




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 5 June 1997, the applicant entered active duty as a combat engineer officer, Engineer Corps, USAR.  On 1 December 2000, she was promoted to captain, pay grade O-3.

2.  On 30 April 2006, the applicant was discharged in the rank of captain, pay grade O-3, due to miscellaneous/general reasons.  She had completed a total of 8 years, 10 months, and 26 days of active duty service.

3.  Orders C-02-002846, HRC, dated 23 February 2010, announced the applicant's appointment as a captain, pay grade O-3, Engineer Corps, with assignment to the 85th USAR Support Command (West), effective 22 February 2010.

4.  Orders B-10-106961, HRC, dated 25 October 2011, announced the applicant's promotion to major with an effective date and date of rank of 
29 August 2011.

5.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions, Special Actions, HRC.  It stated that on 30 April 2006 the applicant was discharged from the Army's Active Duty List (ADL) as a captain for miscellaneous/general reasons.  There are no available records to confirm that she had been transferred to the Army's Reserve Active Status List (RASL) prior to her appointment effective 22 February 2010.  During her break in service she was not eligible for promotion consideration.  She did not attain eligibility for promotion consideration until the fiscal year 2011 Major, Army Promotion List, Non-Active Guard/Reserve Promotion Selection Board.  Based on her date of rank for major, she is not currently in the promotion zone and is not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC.  Accordingly, her request for promotion consideration was determined not to have merit.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14301 states an officer is eligible for consideration for Reserve promotion only if the officer is on the RASL and during the one-year period ending on the date of the convening of the promotion board the officer has continuously performed service on either the RASL or the ADL (or a combination of both lists).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her military records should be corrected by showing she is eligible to be considered for promotion to LTC because she was not considered by two previous major promotion selection boards.
2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was discharged in the rank of captain in 2006.  She subsequently entered the USAR in 2010 in the rank of captain.  During her break in service, she was not eligible for promotion consideration.  After she entered the USAR, she was not eligible for promotion consideration until she had been on the RASL for the one-year period ending on the date of the convening of the promotion board.

3.  The available evidence shows the applicant was promoted to major effective 29 August 2011, the year following her reentry into the USAR.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary it appears she appeared before the first major board to convene after she had been on the RASL for one year.

4.  The applicant's contention that she is now a year behind her peers is most likely true, and is the result of her break in service during 2006-2010.

5.  There is no apparent error or injustice in this case.

6.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010788



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010788



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012774

    Original file (20090012774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: self-authored statement; electronic mail (e-mail) messages; DD Form 214; Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, Washington, DC memorandum, dated 15 May 2007; Army Reserve Deployment Stabilization Statement, dated 2 June 2009; HRC-Alexandria Memorandum for Record, dated 21 August 2008; Headquarters, Fort Myer Military Community, Arlington, VA, Orders 014-0002, dated 14 January 2009; Honorable Discharge Certificate,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022153

    Original file (20110022153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests adjustment of her captain date of rank (DOR) to 24 February 2002 and promotion consideration to major by a special selection board (SSB). 2008-03-02 day prior to reappointment in ARNG 2006-12-12 day following discharge date from USAR-Reinforcement 1-02-20 subtotal +1 provides for inclusive dates 1-02-21 period of civilian break 2000-12-01 effective date and DOR for promotion to captain on active duty 2002-02-22 adjusted DOR to captain 4. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016259C070206

    Original file (20050016259C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant initially requested, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he remained on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) when he was ordered to active duty on 1 May 2002; and that he be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by a Special Selection Board under Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) criteria. The applicant's contention that he should have been retained on the RASL at the time he was ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 USC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012264

    Original file (20090012264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, her promotion orders to LTC, dated 20 May 2008, were revoked because she had transitioned to active duty (AD). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14317(e) specifies that USAR officers ordered to active duty in time of war or national emergency, may, if eligible, be considered for promotion by a mandatory promotion board convened under section 14101(a) (convene a promotion board to recommend for promotion officers on the RASL) for not more than 2 years from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000763

    Original file (20150000763.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000763 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was scrolled as a USAR major on 4 March 2014 and was given a date of rank of the same date. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) at Fort Knox, Kentucky which opines the applicant accepted a transfer to the USAR, which required her to be scrolled as a commissioned officer in the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011013C070208

    Original file (20040011013C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant claims she has only one official military record, which would be viewed for promotion by either a RC or ADL promotion selection board, and she feels if she is qualified and selected for promotion to LTC by the RC, she should also be qualified to be promoted on the ADL. She also questions how the same military record used to select her for promotion to LTC in the RC does not result in her being qualified and selected for promotion on active duty. Paragraph 1-35 of the officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001599

    Original file (20150001599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the Board finds that he was improperly discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2007 * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to reflect the breaks in service * restoration of his highest rank achieved, lieutenant colonel (LTC), and that he be allowed to continue to serve in that capacity until mandatory retirement at age 60 * service credit in the rank of LTC retroactive to the date of his enlistment on 21 February 2014 2. On 3 April 2013, by email,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003972

    Original file (20110003972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the September 2005 Special Selection Board (SSB) with back pay and allowances and placement on the Retired List in the grade of LTC. However, despite being in the Retired Reserve, in 1993 he was considered for promotion to MAJ, but he was not selected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Voiding Orders 08-036-00050, issued by Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022351

    Original file (20120022351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was selected for promotion to LTC in June 2012 and he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 August 2012. Although the applicant was selected for promotion prior to his REFRAD from the AGR Program, the board was not approved until after his REFRAD, resulting in the applicant being a promotable LTC on the RASL. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2012 the applicant was notified by memorandum that the Secretary of the Army approved the SELCON Board recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024926

    Original file (20100024926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders C-09-521084, issued by HRC on 21 September 2005, releasing her from the USAR Control Group and reassigning her to the 77th RRC, Fort Totten, NY, effective 21 September 2005. b. DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 1 April 2011, showing the applicant was assigned to HHC, 77th RRC on 22 September 2005, in paragraph/line number 019/02, position title executive officer, and an authorized grade of O-3. The effective date of promotion and DOR will be the same as if the...