Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010299
Original file (20140010299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010299 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of an arrowhead device.

2.  The applicant states that he made over 30 helicopter landings and at least
3 were "hot" landings (assault landings).

3.  The applicant provides an article detailing the eligibility for award of the arrowhead device.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 July 1968.  He completed his initial training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 13 December 1968 through 9 August 1969, while assigned to:

	a.  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion (Airmobile), 501st Infantry Regiment, performing the duties of a rifleman and

	b.  Company E, 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment, performing the duties of a scout observer.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 30 June 1970.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued to him at that time does not show award of the arrowhead device for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal.  

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows Headquarters, Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 48, dated 1971 as amended by DAGO 8, dated 1979 announced award of assault landing credits to participating units in an airborne assault in the vicinity of Katum, RVN between the hours of 0900 and 0907, inclusive 22 February 1967.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the "arrowhead" will be worn on the appropriate service medal to denote participation in a combat parachute jump, helicopter assault landing, combat glider landing, or amphibious assault landing while assigned or attached as a member of an organized force carrying out an assigned tactical mission.  Individual assault credit is tied directly to the combat assault credit decision for the unit to which the Soldier is assigned.  The unit must be credited with a combat assault in order for the Soldier to receive credit for a combat assault and the Soldier must physically exit the aircraft or the watercraft as appropriate.  The arrowhead is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for this assault landing in Vietnam.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that on only one occasion did DAGO announce award of assault landing credit to participating units in an airborne assault in the RVN, which was in the vicinity of Katum, RVN between the hours of 0900 and 0907, inclusive, on 22 February 1967.

2.  Evidence shows the applicant served in the RVN beginning in January 1969.  Therefore, there is no evidence on which to base award of the arrowhead device for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010299





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010299



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010451

    Original file (20140010451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Therefore, there is no evidence on which to base award of the arrowhead device for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001132

    Original file (20150001132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show eligibility for award of the Arrowhead Device and any unit citations awarded during his in-country service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during 1968 through 1969. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Therefore, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017793

    Original file (20140017793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The arrowhead is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for this assault landing in Vietnam. b. Paragraph 7–23 states assault landing credit (award of the bronze arrowhead) may be made to units of the Army who, in the combat zone of a battle, campaign, or expedition as established by Joint Chiefs of Staff or DA, accomplishes one of the following types of assault operations: (1) Makes a parachute jump into enemy-held territory as a part of an organized force carrying out an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003512

    Original file (20110003512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The unit must be credited with a combat assault in order for the Soldier to receive the Parachutist Badge with the bronze service star affixed and each Soldier must physically exit the aircraft to receive combat assault credit and the Parachutist Badge with bronze service star. This bronze star appurtenance is currently shown with the Parachutist Badge on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 October 1985. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010659

    Original file (20140010659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of an arrowhead to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. On 22 March 2010, in response to his request for correction of his records to show the Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, the Army Review Boards Agency, Support Division, St. Louis, MO, issued him a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), correcting his DD Form 214 to show the following: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012428

    Original file (20140012428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 June 1966 and held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman). The Arrowhead Device is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for this assault landing in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Arrowhead Device for wear on the applicant’s Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010183

    Original file (20100010183.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Purple Heart * Arrowhead Device for the Vietnam Service Medal based on participation in an amphibious assault in conjunction with the 1st Marine Division during the Spring of 1968 * Joint Service Commendation Medal based on combat duty performed with the 1st Marine Division during the Tet Counteroffensive campaign in 1968 2. The applicant states the following: * He was wounded in combat as an infantry squad member *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010507

    Original file (20140010507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM may be awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. It also shows the 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry Regiment was awarded, in DAGO 53, 1970, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020606

    Original file (20140020606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Bronze Arrowhead Device on the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of participation is required to be awarded the Bronze Arrowhead Device for that assault landing. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007516

    Original file (20090007516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add the Combat Infantry Badge (CIB) and a bronze service star (denoting a combat parachute jump) to his Parachute Badge. While the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 June 1967 shows his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 April 1971 does not. As a result, the Board...