Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010249
Original file (20140010249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010249 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests disenrollment from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states that he was told that he could cancel enrollment in the SBP before he got it and has now found that it is not true.  He goes on to state that he cannot afford the premiums and it is putting him in debt. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 July 2008 for a period of      3 years and 19 weeks and training as a unit supply specialist.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and his advanced individual training at Fort Lee, Virginia before being transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington for his first and only assignment.

2.  He continued to serve until he was retired in the pay grade of E-5 on 15 February 2013 due to disability, permanent (enhanced).  He had served 4 years, 6 months and 24 days of active service and elected spouse and child full coverage under the SBP.  He was granted a 40% disability rating.

3.  On 16 April 2014, the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

4.  SBP is a life insurance program that pays an annuity to eligible beneficiaries upon the death of covered former service members.  As a Federal Government insurance program, mainly subsidized by participant premiums, it is strictly governed by Federal statutes that set forth rules for its operation, including eligibility for enrollment, designation of beneficiaries, and authorized changes to beneficiaries.  Retirees do not earn SBP through their service – they earn the right to participate in SBP.

5.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provides that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to eligible surviving family members.  An election, once made, is irrevocable except in certain circumstances.   Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985, but effective
1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 provides, in pertinent part, that effective
1 March 1986, a married member is enrolled in SBP with spouse coverage based on full retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the member pursuant to Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7B, Chapter 43.  When the spouse's concurrence is required, the signature indicating concurrence must be corroborated by one or more witnesses.  This chapter also states, in pertinent part, that the Secretary of the Military Department concerned (or designee) may correct any election or any change or revocation of an election when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an administrative error.

7.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be disenrolled from the SBP because he does not remember making an election to enroll has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  Official records contain a copy of his election at the time and the form is properly executed.  There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was misinformed of his options under the SBP.  While there is evidence to show he attempted to terminate his SBP shortly after the first anniversary of his retired pay, he was not eligible and will not be eligible until the second anniversary of when his retired pay began.

3.  Accordingly, there is no error or injustice in his case and no basis to grant his request.
4.  However, he is not precluded from exercising his option to disenroll from the SBP, with his wife’s concurrence, during the 1-year period following the second anniversary of receipt of his retired pay, without repayment of premiums.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  _x_______  _x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.


      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010249





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010249



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019285

    Original file (20140019285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140019285 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 March 2014, the retirement service office (RSO) at Fort Knox dispatched a certified letter by mail to the applicant’s spouse along with a Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement and instructions to complete and return it no later than 1 September 2014. The statement provided by the applicant’s spouse indicates he returned the Spouse SBP Concurrence Statement in April 2014...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819

    Original file (20110020819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007149

    Original file (20090007149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he clearly elected not to participate in the SBP on the DD Form 2656 and his spouse concurred. If the applicant elects to terminate his SBP participation at that time, he is advised that despite his action, the Reserve Component premium add-on will be deducted from his retired pay for life. He is further advised that in his particular case, he can withdraw from the SBP during a 1-year window beginning in December 2010, the second anniversary of his receipt of retired pay,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025215

    Original file (20110025215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was misinformed of his options under the SBP. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019770

    Original file (20110019770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. DFAS records show he had an eligible "spouse" beneficiary for the entire period he paid into the SBP; therefore, neither he nor his children are entitled to a refund of the SBP premiums. Spousal concurrence is needed only when a married person elects to provide an annuity for his spouse at less than the maximum level or to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse. Records show that on 20 March 1978, although he had both a wife and dependent children, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021300

    Original file (20110021300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012517

    Original file (20140012517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 May 2012, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (PDA) provided the applicant a DD Form 2656 and advised him to proceed to the nearest Retirement Services Officer (RSO) for assistance in completing the form. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was originally determined to be 20% disabled and was recommended for discharge with severance pay or transfer to the Retired Reserve to await his non-regular retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009786

    Original file (20120009786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a statement from his spouse. In item 32 (Member), the statement reads "Also I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. c. In Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage; the date of the spouse's signature in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004305

    Original file (20120004305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100028330 on 23 June 2011. He applied to the Board to terminate his SBP coverage. Beginning 1 October 2008, a member who is at least 70 years of age and has made a minimum of 360 months of premium payments is eligible to have their monthly premiums stopped.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012857

    Original file (20110012857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also elected to not participate in the SBP. The applicant contends that she declined her participation in the SBP when she requested retired pay at age 60 and should be reimbursed the premiums she has paid. Accordingly, she may submit an election to terminate her enrollment in SBP, providing her spouse concurs, with an effective date anytime from 1 April 2013 to 30 March 2014.