Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010033
Original file (20140010033.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  20 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010033 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states:

* he served in the Army for 3 years, 9 months, and 4 days
* his commander ordered the destruction of their military records when their unit in Korea was overrun by Chinese communist forces
* he did not receive a courteous welcome upon his return to the United States from his service in Korea

3.  The applicant provides:

* letter of support
* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service member's records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire or they may have been destroyed prior to that fire as the applicant suggests.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 July 1948 and served as a medical technician in the Republic of Korea.  After completing 3 years, 9 months, and 4 days of active service, he was honorably discharged on 17 April 1952 in the rank of sergeant with no lost time.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp
* Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation
* Purple Heart
* United Nations Service Medal
* Combat Medical Badge

5.  There is no evidence showing the applicant was ever awarded the AGCM and no evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded the applicant from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  The applicant provided a letter of support from a retired U.S. Army colonel attesting to the applicant's exemplary personal character and military service in both Japan and Korea.  He states the applicant served with distinction during his deployment in Korea.  The applicant had no concern for the Silver Star or Bronze Star Medal; his greatest distress was that he was not awarded the AGCM.  He requests award of the AGCM to the applicant to correct the oversight.

7.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as "excellent" or higher. There must have been no convictions by court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the AGCM was carefully considered.

2.  He served honorably during the period 14 July 1948 through 17 April 1952 and separated in the rank of sergeant with no lost time.  It is presumed that he met the criteria for the AGCM.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) at this time and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  __X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
14 July 1948 through 13 July 1951
* adding the Army Good conduct Medal (1st Award) to his DD Form 214


      __________X_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010033



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010033



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001355C071029

    Original file (20070001355C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and removal of the lost time entry from Item 38 (Remarks) of his 11 June 1952 separation document (DD Form 214). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence also confirms that based on his active duty service and service in Korea, the applicant is also entitled to the NDSM and ROK-KWSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009346

    Original file (20100009346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). According to Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 9-12, the UNSM is authorized for Soldiers who served in Korea during the period 27 June 1950 to 27 July 1954. Although the evidence does not show the actual dates he served in Korea, his service there is confirmed by his being awarded the Korean...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021550

    Original file (20120021550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not understand why the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denied award of the "Army of Occupation Medal (Japan)." His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - Korean Service Medal with 1 silver service star and 2 bronze service stars and United Nations Service Medal * Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) - Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002841

    Original file (20140002841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM) and the Korean Service Medal (KSM). The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant's unit was awarded the ROK PUC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019135

    Original file (20110019135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 also shows the following awards: * Army of Occupation Medal (Japan) * Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. The available records show he was separated in the rank of SGT after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 14 days of active duty service with no lost time and section 18 of his DD Form 230 confirms he was favorably considered for the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010076

    Original file (20140010076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show any and all awards and decorations he was awarded during his term of service. c. item 27 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), he was awarded or authorized: * Army Occupation Medal (Japan) * Korean Service Medal with four bronze service stars * United Nations Ribbon (now titled the United Nations Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025094

    Original file (20110025094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 17 October 1952. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The available evidence shows the applicant completed a period of qualifying service in Korea for award of the ROK-KWSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005818

    Original file (20140005818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017030

    Original file (20080017030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005052

    Original file (20090005052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his date of entry on active duty as 19 August 1948 instead of 19 August 1946, and award of the Korean Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, the [Republic of] Korea War Service Medal, and the Korea Defense Service Medal. With respect to award of the Korean Service Medal and the Republic of Korea War Service Medal: a. his DD Form 214 shows he completed 2...