Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009614
Original file (20140009614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  3 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009614 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was medically retired with a 40 percent (%) disability rating.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 omitted presumptive Gulf War related illnesses and he was not awarded a medical disability rating.  When the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded him compensation for his Gulf War related disability on 1 July 2002, he was already on leave and retiring at that time.  He was treated for his Gulf War related presumptive diseases while still on active duty; however, he was never issued a physical profile or a disability rating. 

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum for record, dated 6 May 2014 and two VA rating decisions, dated 1 September 2003 and 3 April 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 
justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 1976.  He held military occupational specialties (MOS) 92G (Food Service) and 11B (Infantryman), served through a series of reenlistments and assignments, and attained the rank/grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8.

3.  The last six DA Forms 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER)) in his record span a period from March 1995 to January 2001. During the period covered by these six NCOERs – 

* he was promoted from sergeant first class (SFC) to MSG
* he served and was rated in MOS 92G as a Food Service Sergeant, Operations Training NCO, Title 11 Operations Training NCO, Senior Food Operations Management NCO, and Brigade Senior Food Operations Management Sergeant
* he passed the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) each year and met Army height and weight requirements
* he was not on a physical profile during these six rating periods
* he received only "excellence" or "success" ratings and was consistently ranked as among the best and fully capable by his raters 
* his senior raters consistently rated him as successful and superior

4.  His service medical records are not available for review with this case.  Additionally, there is no evidence in his available records that indicate he suffered from an injury, illness, or any medical condition that rendered him physically unfit or unable to perform the duties required by his grade or military specialty, or that would have warranted his entry into the Army's physical disability evaluation system (PDES).

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement on 30 June 2002.  

6.  He submitted two VA Rating decisions, dated 1 September 2003 and 3 April 2007.  

	a.  In September 2003, the VA stated he was awarded a disability rating of 10% for hypertension and 10% for a generalized anxiety disorder with panic attacks.  The VA listed these conditions as "service connected, Gulf War incurred."  These ratings were effective on 1 July 2002.

	b.  On 3 April 2007, the VA awarded him a service connected disability rating on 10% for degenerative joint disease in the left shoulder and 10% for degenerative joint disease in the right shoulder, effective 1 July 2002.

7.  Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment; induction; appointment, including officer procurement programs; retention; and separation, including retirement.  Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the VA's Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30%. 

9.  Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permit the VA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  However, an award of a higher VA rating does not establish error or injustice on the part of the Army.  The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service.  The Army disability rating is to compensate the individual for the loss of a military career.  The VA does not have authority or responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service.  The VA awards disability ratings to veterans for service-connected conditions, including those conditions detected after discharge, to compensate the individual for loss of civilian employability.  Unlike the Army, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his or her lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence the applicant was diagnosed with any medical condition, prior to his separation, which was severe enough to warrant his entry into the PDES.  In fact, his last 6 NCOERs, which covered a period from 1995 to 2001, show he was able to pass the APFT and was successfully performing his military duties.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was diagnosed with a medical condition that rendered him physically unfit or unable to perform the duties required by his grade or military specialty. 

3.  When identified, diagnosed, evaluated, and rated, a disability rating assigned by the Army is based on the level of disability at the time of the Soldier's separation and can only be accomplished through the PDES.

4.  A diagnosis of a medical condition and/or a subsequent award of a rating by another agency does not establish an error by the Army.  Operating under different laws and their own policies, the VA does not have the authority or the responsibility for determining medical unfitness for military service.  The VA may award ratings because of a medical condition related to service (service-connected) affecting an individual's civilian employability.  Furthermore, the VA has the responsibility and jurisdiction to recognize any changes in a condition over time by adjusting a disability rating.

5.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009614





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009614



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002842

    Original file (20120002842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual may have a medical condition that is not considered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006380

    Original file (20110006380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the Physical Evaluation Board rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007596

    Original file (20140007596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In May 2011, a PEB found the FSM unfit to continue military service and opined that his condition neither occurred nor was aggravated by active duty service. The condition of ALS. Consequently, although FSM's medical condition of ALS was considered unfit, it was considered unfit by reason of physical disability neither incurred nor aggravated during any period of service while he was entitled to basic pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015348

    Original file (20100015348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent. c. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. Even though he states he has received a 120 percent disability rating by the VA, the award of VA compensation does not mandate disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002259

    Original file (20140002259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was retired due to physical disability. A DA Form 3947 (MEB Proceedings), dated in October 2004, reports: a. an MEB convened to evaluate his medical conditions: * Chronic bilateral ankle pain * Severe bilateral pes planus * Bilateral talar avascular necrosis b. all of the evaluated conditions were found to be unacceptable and he no longer met medical retention standards; c. he did not desire to continue on active duty;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021459

    Original file (20110021459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his previous request he specifically requested on his DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552) to appear before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) along with a Veterans of Foreign Wars representative, if available. The VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) is the standard under which percentage rating decisions are to be made for disabled military personnel. There is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019117

    Original file (20080019117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The evidence of record shows a PEB reviewed the applicant's medical condition on 23 May 2005 and on 11 January 2007. An informal PEB that convened on 19 August 2008 found the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018744

    Original file (20100018744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by: * increasing his assigned disability rating from the physical evaluation board (PEB) from 10 percent to 30 percent or more * showing he was either retired or medically retired instead of honorably discharged with entitlement to severance pay 2. He was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), assigned codes 5299 and 5295 for his chronic low back pain, with right lower extremity radicular pain, status post...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016388

    Original file (20100016388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his/her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before that service member can be medically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003079

    Original file (20150003079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant's case was thoroughly reviewed and carefully considered throughout the PDES process. Thus, there is no evidence of record to show the applicant's other medical conditions were unfitting at the time of his separation from active duty. The evidence of record shows the VA has granted the applicant disability compensation for several service-connected medical conditions.