Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009486
Original file (20140009486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009486 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in:

* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)
* Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) – the Field Artillery Training Course, Integrated Fire Control (IFC) Survey Party, and Vietnam Process Overseas Replacement (POR) training, Weapons Qualification Training (M16)
* Item 30 (Remarks) – Vietnam 1 February 1969 to 25 January 1970

2.  The applicant states these items were omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214, effective 25 January 1970
* Unit Orders Number 24, dated 3 July 1968
* Unit Orders Number 56, dated 24 July 1968
* Special Orders Number 201, dated 20 November 1968
* Special Orders Number 029, dated 29 January 1969
* Special Orders Number 34, dated 3 February 1969
* General Orders Number 2471, dated 20 December 1969
* DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 February 1968.  He completed the Field Artillery Basic Individual Training course and he was awarded primary (PMOS) 13A (Field Artilleryman) on 28 June 1968.  He was subsequently reclassified into PMOS 16C (Hawk Fire Control Crewmember).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 27 (Military Education):  blank;

	b.  item 28 (Specialized Training):

* Army Training Program, 2 May 1968
* Code of Conduct, 11 March 1968
* Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 11 March 1968
* Geneva Convention, 30 July 1968

	c.  item 38 (Record of Assignment) he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 17 February to 5 August 1969, while assigned to the Headquarters and Support Battery, 2nd Battalion, 40th Artillery, 199th Infantry Brigade;

	d.  item 38 he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for all periods; and

	e.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no evidence in the available records showing he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

4.  Headquarters, 199th Infantry Brigade (Separate)(Light), Vietnam, issued General Orders Number 2471, dated 20 December 1969, which awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious achievement in the RVN for the period 6 February to 
5 July 1969.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 25 June 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 24 days of creditable active service, of which 11 months and 23 days was foreign service.  This form also shows:

	a.  in item 24 he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM);

	b.  in item 25, does not list any completed training course; and

	c.  item 30, does not list any foreign service.

6.  On 14 August 1970, his DD Form 214 was corrected to show additional awards in item 24:

* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device "1960"
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M14)

7.  He provides:

	a.  private first class promotion orders issued by the 6th Training Battalion, First Advanced Individual Training Brigade, Fort Sill, OK;

	b.  appointment orders assigning him as an alternate to the IFC Survey Party, 60th Artillery, Porter, IN; and

	c.  temporary duty orders issued for the purpose of attending the Vietnam POR Training (M16) Course, Fort Riley, KS;

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents, in effect at the time, 
governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personal at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  The regulation stated:

* Item 22c - would list the total active duty outside the continental United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed
* Item 24 - would lists all decorations awarded or authorized
* Item 25 - would list all service schools successfully completed and military sponsored courses completed in civilian schools and colleges during the period covered by the DD Form 214
* Item 30 - the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam performed on or after 5 August 1964 would be listed in item 30

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year service entirely during the period 7 December 1941 through 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-marital.

10.  A review of his records indicates his entitlement to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the regulatory guidance for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following three campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968-22 February 1969)
* Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 (23 February-8 June 1969)
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June-31 October 1969)

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 2nd Battalion, 40th Artillery was awarded the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 
12 December 1966 to 31 August 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders 51, dated 1971.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the ARCOM, completed additional military training, and his period of service in the RVN.

2.  General Orders awarded him the ARCOM for the period 6 February to 5 July 1969.   Therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.
3.  The evidence shows he served in the RVN from 17 February to 5 August 1969.  Regulatory guidance, in effect at the time, stated to enter the overseas theater in item 22c of the DD Form 214 and the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam in item 30 of the DD Form 214; therefore, it would be appropriate to add his RVN period service to his DD Form 214.

4.  General orders awarded his unit the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, this unit award should be shown on his DD Form 214.

5.  He participated in three campaigns which authorize  him to wear three bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these bronze service stars.

6.  His records are void of any derogatory information which would have disqualified him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his records should be corrected to show this award.

7.  The applicant completed the Individual Field Artillery Training Course, 
6 weeks, June 1968, and regulatory guidance permits completion of service school courses to be listed on his DD Form 214.  However, his participation in the IFC Survey Party and completed the Vietnam POR Training (M16) training are not permitted for the same reason.

8.  In view of the above, he should be granted partial relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  _X_______  _X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
28 February 1968 through 25 January 1970; and

b.  adding the following to his DD Form 214 in:

* item 24–

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Army Commendation 
* three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

* item 22c - the entry "USARPAC" 
* item 25 - the entry "Field Artillery Training Course, 6 weeks, June 1968
* item 30 - the entry "Vietnam Service – 17 Feb 69-5 Aug 69" 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding his Vietnam POR Training and his IFC Survey Party participation.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009486





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009486



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019729

    Original file (20140019729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 14 (Military Education), add the following courses: * Noncommissioned Officer's (NCO) Candidate Course * Airborne Course * Ranger Course * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) POR training course 2. This conclusion is based on the following: * after completing AIT, his DA Form 20 shows him as an NCO candidate, after which he is listed as participating in Airborne and Ranger training * there is an entry showing the successful completion of the Infantry Leadership Course * there is no entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021434

    Original file (20100021434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021434 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Army Commendation Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Combat Infantryman Badge *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009964

    Original file (20120009964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and did not receive the PH. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 13 June 1968 through 14 January 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058705C070421

    Original file (2001058705C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He contends that he was awarded the ARCOM and CIB for service to the United States and it would only be just to show this correction in his military records. Therefore, the Board is sufficiently convinced that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious achievement during his assignment with the 11 th Artillery and is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007787

    Original file (20100007787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his completion of Preparation for Overseas Replacement (POR) training * his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11C4H (Heavy Weapons Infantryman Advisor) * award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal * award of the U.S. Presidential Unit Citation * award of the Republic of Vietnam Presidential Unit Citation 2. Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016615

    Original file (20110016615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This publication shows that the 101st Airborne Division Artillery and the 377th Artillery, during the time of the applicant's assignment, were respectfully cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated in 1970; and in DAGO Number 48, dated in 1971; for awards of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018773

    Original file (20140018773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 885, issued by Headquarters, II Field Force Vietnam Artillery, dated 29 July 1970 awarded him the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force for the period from August 1969 to July 1970. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * MUC * VSM with four bronze service stars * RVN Civil Actions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011591

    Original file (20110011591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for 1 year, 9 months, and 24 days. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007005

    Original file (20090007005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded and/or served in an infantry MOS, or that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. It provides that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001683

    Original file (20110001683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show four unit awards his unit received for the period he served in Vietnam. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show four unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214...