Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009440
Original file (20140009440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 January 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009440 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was diagnosed with unfitting conditions and medically discharged with an honorable characterization of service.

2.  The applicant states he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and was ordered to active duty for training (ADT).  He was released from ADT with an uncharacterized characterization of service.  He was separated from the USAR on 26 June 2011.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and military/civilian medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 27 June 2003 for a period of 8 years.

3.  A DD Form 214 shows he was ordered to ADT on 17 July 2003, released from ADT on 17 December 2003 based on completion of required active service, and transferred to a USAR unit.  It also shows he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92F (Petroleum Supply Specialist) and that he had completed 5 months and 1 day of net active duty service this period.  Item 24 (Character of Service) shows the entry, 'Uncharacterized."

4.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR), paragraph 2-5, states the ABCMR will not consider any application if it determines the individual has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them.  There is no evidence the applicant requested correction of the characterization of service (i.e., uncharacterized) shown on his DD Form 214 by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command.
Therefore, that portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 26 June 2011 based on expiration of his military service obligation.

6.  A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence that he was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) during the period of service under review.

7.  In support of his application the applicant provides the following documents.

   a.  DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 9 May 2005, with military medical records, that show the applicant was diagnosed with hypertension.  The DA Form 2173 does not show a finding for the line of duty determination.

   b.  Headquarters, 81st Regional Readiness Command, Birmingham, AL, memorandum, dated 13 April “2006,” subject:  Notification of Medical Unfitness for Retention, that shows as a result of the applicant's medical examination he was determined to be medically disqualified for continued service in the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation, Including Retirement).  He was to respond by 21 May 2005 indicating the option he chose regarding his medical disqualification.  (There is no record of a response by the applicant.)

   c.  A Soldier's Acknowledgement or Pre-MMRB (MOS Medical Retention Board) Counseling, dated 21 July 2007, that shows the applicant waived personal appearance before the MMRB.

   d.  His military and civilian medical records, spanning the period from 22 July 2004 to 15 January 2014, that document medical assessments and treatment for hypertension.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  Chapter 3 (Policies) provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his/her continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he/she was unable to perform his/her duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation rendered the member unfit.

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 also states that under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several line of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.  One of the criteria is that the disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show that he was diagnosed with unfitting conditions and medically discharged.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was diagnosed with hypertension in May 2005.

   a.  He was notified that it was determined he was medically disqualified for continued service in the USAR.  However, there is no evidence of record that the applicant responded to the notification indicating the option he chose.  



   b.  He was notified to appear before an MMRB in July 2007.  The evidence of record shows that he waived personal appearance before the MMRB.
   
   c.  There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was diagnosed with any unfitting medical condition(s) by an MEB/PEB during the period of his military service.

   d.   He continued to serve in the USAR until expiration of his military service obligation on 26 June 2011.

3.  The evidence of record shows that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he/she was unable to perform his duties.  The evidence of record fails to support a conclusion that he was unable to perform his duties.  

4.  In addition, there is no evidence of record to show his hypertension incurred while he was entitled to basic pay. 

5.  Thus, he is not entitled to a medical discharge.

6.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009440



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009440



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021168

    Original file (20100021168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: a. the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) wrongfully separated him from the service without properly counseling him of his right to elect referral to the PDES; b. he was not afforded a fair evaluation by the PDES for conditions for which he was found unfit for continuance in military service; c. the evidence provided is proof he was treated for a lower back injury and left shoulder condition while entitled to military pay and allowances; d. his chain of command and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015968

    Original file (20090015968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical conditions developed during his period of service and were determined by Army Regulations (AR) and medical boards to be the reason for his disqualification for further service; therefore, he requests correction of the decision previously rendered in his case because the disqualifying conditions were not due to his own fault or misconduct. However, along with the notification, he would have been required to acknowledge the notification and elect one of the following options on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001222

    Original file (20130001222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * memorandum, dated 14 October 2003, subject: Notification of MMRB Proceedings * memorandum, dated 19 November 2003, subject: Summary of MMRB Proceedings * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 25 March 2005 * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 29 July 2002 * memorandum, dated 29 July 2002, subject: Request for Active Duty Medical Extension (ADME) Status * letter from the Director, NYC Public Affairs Office, U.S. Marine Corps (USMC), dated 23...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011620

    Original file (20100011620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While assigned to the IRR, the applicant was recommended for a PEB, the PEB convened on 17 April 2007 and found him physically fit to perform the duties of his grade, rank, and MOS and considered him deployable within the limitations of his profile. The last and only record of APFT that the applicant performed while assigned to that command was on 6 June 2007. Members with conditions, as listed in this chapter, are considered medically unfit for retention on active duty and are referred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013367

    Original file (20090013367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record further shows that on 31 July 2007 the applicant was issued a permanent profile for a ruptured globe in the right eye. The evidence of record shows the only reference to the applicant appearing before a medical board occurred in February 2007, but the permanent profile he received in July 2007 concerning the same issue indicated that no medical board was needed. The evidence further shows that the applicant continued to perform his military duties until he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019324

    Original file (20090019324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. Although the applicant contends he should have gone through medical processing since his injury occurred on active duty, the available evidence shows his medical condition did not render him medically unfit or unable to meet retention...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008282

    Original file (20130008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (4) On 26 March 2004, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) considered his bilateral knee pain due to patellofemoral arthritis unfit, existed prior to service and permanently aggravated by an LOD injury on 12 August 2003. (4) His orders show he has 20 years of service and his DD Form 214 states he was discharged with severance pay. The evidence of record shows he later submitted a statement requesting his medical board paperwork be reevaluated to increase his disability rating to 40% for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021258

    Original file (20110021258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any documentation to show he revealed his medical condition to the USAR at the time of his enlistment. a. Paragraph 3-21 (Heart) states the causes for referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) include but is not limited to cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or congestive heart failure due to fixed obstructive coronary artery disease or coronary artery spasm. d. Paragraph 9-12 (Request for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)) states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003731

    Original file (20130003731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Her captain/company commander did anything he could to destroy her career * Upon discharge in 2005, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated her right shoulder, back, and both knees to be 70 percent disabling * She had those same problems during the last 6 months of active service * She believes she should have received a permanent physical profile and been medically retired because she had 24 years of service * She had physical profiles from September 2003 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021758

    Original file (20110021758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that when she returned home from basic training she started seeing a doctor for her knee pain. (2) She would be discharged from the USAR if she failed to complete the basic training program. Her record contains a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) which shows her effective date of entry on active duty was 5 June 2007 and the date she departed from her duty station to home was 18 August 2007, which resulted in being credited with 74 days of active duty service and...